We're naked before the missile-might of them blood-crazed sand ni@@ers!

[ribonucleic]

We must strike first before our vulnerability (treasonously broadcast by the Zionist-pawn Bloomberg!) is treacherously exploited by the filthy Arab!

A pure case of self-defense!

And only someone who wants our troops dead would be so morally revolting as to question the noble patriotism of such a decision... 

-----------------


Navy Lacks Plan to Defend Against `Carrier-Destroying' Missile


March 23 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Navy, after nearly six years of warnings from
Pentagon testers, still lacks a plan for defending aircraft carriers against a supersonic Russian-built missile, according to current and former officials and Defense Department documents.

The missile, known in the West as the ``Sizzler,'' has been deployed by China and may be purchased by
Iran. Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England has given the Navy until April 29 to explain how it will counter the missile, according to a Pentagon budget document.

The Defense Department's weapons-testing office judges the threat so serious that its director, Charles McQueary, warned the Pentagon's chief weapons-buyer in a memo that he would move to stall production of multibillion-dollar ship and missile programs until the issue was addressed.

``This is a carrier-destroying weapon,'' said Orville Hanson, who evaluated weapons systems for 38 years with the Navy. ``That's its purpose.''


http://news.yahoo.com/s/bloomberg/20070323/pl_bloomberg/ako7y_orw538

[ribonucleic]

What if the next "9/11" is the sinking of an American aircraft carrier by one of these new Superscary missiles?

Dead American soldiers! We must retaliate with nuclear force! ["remember, keep 'em away from the oil wells, boys."

Oh, and someone throw those boys 20 billion or so to build us a new carrier. ["see you at the 19th hole, Stan."  ]

What do you mean... "we had hundreds of those stockpiled in the region" ? Are you suggesting that we blew up that carrier ourselves? Haha... someone get this kid some tinfoil! LOL

[240 is Back]

recipe for a false flag, no doubt.

kidnapped british soldiers, first.  perhaps we'll be told they 'gave up' the location of the ship.

then, this new missile we were coincidentally told about, is used.

holy shit, that would be a terrible thing.  people who glanced at 911 and shrugged off WMD would just accept what Tony Snow tells them.  Sad. 

[OzmO]

recipe for a false flag, no doubt.

kidnapped british soldiers, first.  perhaps we'll be told they 'gave up' the location of the ship.

then, this new missile we were coincidentally told about, is used.

holy shit, that would be a terrible thing.  people who glanced at 911 and shrugged off WMD would just accept what Tony Snow tells them.  Sad. 

The location of an American carrier is hardly something difficult to do.   Beside those brits wouldn't know or be carry information on American carrier locations

[240 is Back]

The location of an American carrier is hardly something difficult to do.   Beside those brits wouldn't know or be carry information on American carrier locations

I agree completely.  But IMO, if there was to be an attack, it would be connected somehow.  Or, maybe they just do that to piss off the Brits into entering the war.