Author Topic: PAUL DILLET and RONNIE COLEMAN posing at arnold classic 1997 (Read 8492 times)

the shadow · « **on:** March 26, 2007, 10:26:22 AM »

damn just look at paul dillet..freak

figgs · « **Reply #1 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:33:15 AM »

Ian Harrison=Paul Dillet?

the shadow · « **Reply #2 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:36:54 AM »

Quote from: figgs on March 26, 2007, 10:33:15 AM

Ian Harrison=Paul Dillet?

that dumb fuck had no idea

Necrosis · « **Reply #3 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:38:23 AM »

fuck that announcer was fugging terrible. "superb......ba...back... ... spread....lat from coleman" meanwhile its a fucking back double bi.

the shadow · « **Reply #4 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:39:21 AM »

Quote from: usmokepole on March 26, 2007, 10:38:23 AM

fuck that announcer was fugging terrible. "superb......ba...back... ... spread....lat from coleman" meanwhile its a fucking back double bi.

ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhaahahah lol

XXXII/LX · « **Reply #5 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:43:29 AM »

Ronnie looked great back then.

MAXX · « **Reply #6 on:** March 26, 2007, 10:51:20 AM »

sick arms on Dillet. to bad his back sucks and he cant hit a pose to save his life..

pumpster · « **Reply #7 on:** March 26, 2007, 11:34:18 AM »

Quote from: MAXX on March 26, 2007, 10:51:20 AM

sick arms on Dillet. to bad his back sucks and he cant hit a pose to save his life..

His back wasn't bad actually, and was about the only weakness other than posing. From the front he beat anyone else. Too bad about the politics.

the shadow · « **Reply #8 on:** March 26, 2007, 11:35:45 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on March 26, 2007, 11:34:18 AM

His back wasn't bad actually, and was about the only weakness other than posing. Too bad about that and the politics.

he made ronnie look like a lil bitch..i think so pauls taper was pretty amazing though

Hulkster · « **Reply #9 on:** March 26, 2007, 12:08:56 PM »

goddman neither one can hold a pose to save his life.

whats the point in doing a posing routine where you hit a bunch of half contracted poses and don't hold any of them?

Petrucci · « **Reply #10 on:** March 26, 2007, 12:34:54 PM »

but man, it was obvious Ronnie would became Mr O, he was simply perfect!!!!!

sorry about this, but since yates it seems a Mr O has to get WORSE while getting bigger to get the title and maintain it....

Hulkster · « **Reply #11 on:** March 26, 2007, 02:38:45 PM »

Quote from: Petrucci on March 26, 2007, 12:34:54 PM

but man, it was obvious Ronnie would became Mr O, he was simply perfect!!!!!

sorry about this, but since yates it seems a Mr O has to get WORSE while getting bigger to get the title and maintain it....

agreed. Yates set a very bad precedent: size over quality at all cost.

but you can't blame him: he did what the judges called for and won.

$:-\$

its too bad

Bodies · « **Reply #12 on:** March 30, 2007, 01:48:41 AM »

Yates ushered in the of the era of huge bloated guts. Bodybuilding reached it's Zenith in the early 90's. After that the quality of the physiques went down for the sake of size. (unfortunately) Who wants to look or feel like that anyway? Disgusting skin, a huge belly. I've had a bloated gut before and it is not a pleasant feeling...

muscularny · « **Reply #13 on:** March 30, 2007, 02:25:37 AM »

damn unreal

bigkubby · « **Reply #14 on:** March 30, 2007, 02:36:30 AM »

ronnie even till this day needs more mass

Bear · « **Reply #15 on:** March 30, 2007, 05:34:21 AM »

People always talk about Dorian when it comes to calves along with Matarazzo, but Jesus Christ look at Dillets! They're longer because he's taller and appear to have just as much peak and mass. If they're not as good then they're damn close. Nasser also had insane calves!!

Petrucci · « **Reply #16 on:** March 30, 2007, 06:07:32 AM »

Nasser had one of the best set of calves EVER and probably his genetics was a lot better than Yates because at least Yates trained with intensity (but i know, 1 set for like the week looks like a joke) but seeying Nasser training calves in his video may, i do a LOT more than that i my calves are like 1/10 of his, LOL

donrhummy · « **Reply #17 on:** March 30, 2007, 09:29:12 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on March 26, 2007, 02:38:45 PM

agreed. Yates set a very bad precedent: size over quality at all cost.

That's great!

of course, while Yates started it, Ronnie has in recent years continued it.

Rockhead · « **Reply #18 on:** March 30, 2007, 08:35:02 PM »

Wow Paul D was a TERRIBLE poser....I had always heard that but he really is bad.

knny187 · « **Reply #19 on:** March 30, 2007, 09:00:25 PM »

Quote from: Rockhead on March 30, 2007, 08:35:02 PM

Wow Paul D was a TERRIBLE poser....I had always heard that but he really is bad.

I always felt his bro's back in Venice never helped him & his posing because it was one of his only weak areas & kept him from beating their asses in competition

younggunz · « **Reply #20 on:** March 30, 2007, 09:34:04 PM »

Ronnie and dillet looked great, dillet had freaky arms he really looked like a monster, but ronnie killed him on back

Rockhead · « **Reply #21 on:** March 31, 2007, 09:33:02 AM »

he looked like he was doing a front lat spread or something.

Rudee · « **Reply #22 on:** March 31, 2007, 11:52:44 AM »

Damn, Dillets arms must measure over 23". They're bigger then Colemans.

slaveboy1980 · « **Reply #23 on:** March 31, 2007, 11:58:02 AM »

dillets back wasnt as poor as some say...

dillet > yates

dillets structure > colemans structure

the shadow · « **Reply #24 on:** March 31, 2007, 11:59:23 AM »

his v taper was so fuckin awesome.how small was his waistline..i would say around 29-30inches maybe