If you've been avoiding the "British troops treated well by those lovely iranians?" thread after noticing who started it, you've missed a revealing moment...
Ye Olde Rooster was beating his breast over an allegation that the British sailors had been made to wear bags over their heads. My reply was simply...
Too lazy to make even a half-hearted attempt at defending his hypocrisy, he took a moment to insult me
and then issued this remarkable statement...
<< I'd love to ram a broomstick up that fucks ass, then squeeze off a round and turn his head to red mist. >>
There's the question of whether the omitted apostrophe was due to his grammatical ignorance or the mounting excitement of his sadistic fantasy.
But can there be any doubt at this point that this is the true meaning of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay? The military professionals - as opposed to the keyboard warriors with the complete oeuvre of Tom Clancy and copies of
24 on DVD - know that torture is useless in producing reliable intelligence. Not to mention the increased jeopardy it creates for the American troops who these right-wing bleaters are always weeping about needing to be supported.
In other words: The grown-ups whose sordid business is spying and war want nothing to do with this.
That leaves us with the children. Like the George W. who went from blowing up frogs with firecrackers to basing America's foreign policy on "The bad man tried to kill my Daddy". And now our own scrappy Rooster here.
If he's willing, I'd like to ask him why his torture fantasy specifically involves penetrating the rectum of another male. Are you trying to tell us something?
