Which would be good enough evidence to prove you, that 9/11 were terrorist act made by Binladen and his simple little ragheads? Think hard for few weeks before answering this, and be careful or you could sprain your poor little drains. Then you can read answer below:
what you see on the front page of the times and CNN is good enough "evidence" for 97% of the population who, like you, are essentially incapable of understanding the dire need for 911
by amreekaif i told you the same gang behind 911 is the same gang behind iran contra, savings and loan, enron ... what would you still think its so far fetched?
if i told you 911 secured your stranglehold on the worlds resources and helped ensure your grand kids would not be speaking chinese or indian would you still think its so far fetched?
if i told you that 911 had instantly revamped a military that was falling apart due to lack of funding after the cold war, would you still think its so far fetched?
how bout the insider trading?
http://www.yirmeyahureview.com/archive/911/insider_trading.htmpeople with no understanding of cash flows and geo politics cant wrap their minds around this idea, but it has historical precedent ... i would suggest you do some research before talking shit to rob again
finally, if you think its so far fetched why not read "the grand chess board" by zbigniew brzezinski (former national security advisor under carter) ... written years before 911 here are some choice quotes:
Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power."- (p. xiii)
"... But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book.” (p. xiv)
"In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent. About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources." (p.31)
“Never before has a populist democracy attained international supremacy. But the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being. The economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts. Democracy is inimical to imperial mobilization." (p.35)
“The momentum of Asia's economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea." (p.125)
"In the long run, global politics are bound to become increasingly uncongenial to the concentration of hegemonic power in the hands of a single state. Hence, America is not only the first, as well as the only, truly global superpower, but it is also likely to be the very last." (p.209)
"
Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." (p. 211)
smarten up
