Ok.
I thought those were covered in the pit-bull mixed breed category. I may be wrong on that though.
It is interesting to read that 60% of the kills were attributed to rottweilers and pitbulls.
My point is basically this: There is so few kills attributed to golden retrievers, and pitbull and bull dog owners can argue all day long that the breeds aren't specified enough.
But why not try to discuss what can be done to make these kinds of dogs as safe as golden retrievers?
Why constantly try to dodge the issue, why not offer a solution?
Here's my point of view, not being a dog owner: If the owners of these kinds of breeds themselves would offer a solution, then the rest of the society wouldn't rage against these breeds.
It's about controlling the agenda, and right now, like it or not, the pitbull dog owners aren't in control.
Act, don't react.
-Hedge
Goood 1 person who's not letting emotion rule logic.
ANYONE who compares a Pitt Bull bite to a run-of-the-mill dog bite is in La La Land. esp a DMV.
Like comparing a .22 cal wound to a .44 Magnum (sorry inner city Gun Fearers, we like guns out here in Farmland.)
Here's how the problem will go away, but its gonna take awhile because of Pitts deeply inbred TENNACIY (Hey Vet, redefine tenacity too here
)
The breed IS being bred into nothing. It would be better off if Pitts had stayed in the hands of The guys who
fought and bred them in the 1940s - late 1970s when every idiot started bringing one to town.
Esp troubling now in big American cities. I'd suggest the guy talking about keeping guns locked keep one ready to use,
if its legal for him, He might have to quickly Kill his or another dog to save a kid.
Go REREAD Vets 3 "Triggers" for K9's. (OH Oh, did he inadvertently make a Dog/firearm compare?)
Don't forget they are animals. Fact is most K9s are ill trained.
There are SO many over The Top maulings in hospital and legal records by these animals that ignoring it is
embarrassing and irresponsible.
Don't be as stupid as the media by going 180 degrees from the facts.