loco intelligent design relies on no evidence at all, it relies on the fact that we dont know everything and that evolution is not complete like all science.
if evolution is not correct why assum god did it? why not thor, why not any other god.
then you also have to posit positive evidence, or at least rational evidence for god, why there is a god, and how.
i have faith, but its not rational, and you cant really argue for it, ive always conceded that.
im too sick right now to form a cogent argument, but nothing in this world works on irrationality. its safe to assume that everything has a logical explanation since nothing in this world defies logic or rational, why argue that god did it? this defies logic and assumes that supernatural power was used one time, and everything else relies on natural laws.