So, you admit that the theory of macroevolution is not fact.
When it comes to Biology, Dawkins is a brilliant scientist. That I know. Yet, he has presented no proof for macroevolution.
It is only when it comes to his war on religion that Dawkins is a nutjob, and other secular scientists agree. But that is a topic for another thread.
Still, you have presented no proof to support macroevolution, or any proof that humans evolved from an ape like species.
I get the feeling you want me to teach you the science that your supposed scientific education never gave you. I don't mean to be rude, but you have gone on record saying that the claim "The water molecule is made up of two Hydrogen atoms and one Oxygen atom" is just as much an article of faith as religion, so it's obvious you hadn't heard about the electrolysis of water. Perhaps you'd like to start there.
Now if you really want to learn about evolution, there are many excellent books, including Dawkins' books. Alternatively, any freshman or sophomore biology textbook is a good starting point.
As for you calling Dawkins a nutjob, that is EXACTLY what this thread is about. Look at the topic and your first post.
Hmmm, I wonder how this conversation goes:
Loco: I believe that an invisible spirit knocked up a Palestinian Jewish chick about 2000 years ago.
I believe that pregnancy resulted in a little boy who was both the Hebrew God and his Son.
I believe that this fatherless man could perform magic tricks, like turning water into wine and bringing the dead back to life.
I believe this fatherless man was killed brutally then came back to life himself as well.
I believe this fatherless man flew up into the sky.
I believe I can converse regularly with this fatherless man.
I believe this fatherless man will be back.
Dawkins: Cool. You got any evidence for that?
loco: YOU NUTJOB!!! HOW DARE YOU??? NUTJOB!!!