it means whoever controls the counting controls the vote
Who controlled the vote in Ohio in 2004?
Answer - Ken Blackwell - Secretary of the State and honorary co-chair of the Commitee to Re-Elect George Bush
Who controlled the vote in Florida in 2000?
Answer - Katherine Harris - Secretary of the State and former co-chair of Bush's campain in Florida
more from Wiki:
In addition, by Harris' decree, ChoicePoint — a private firm — was hired prior to the election to identify and remove thousands of names from the state voters list on the condition that these people were convicted felons. Many of these would-be voters were turned away at the polls or even prior to reaching the polling places. It would later be discovered that approximately 97% of the people removed from the list — and thus denied the right to vote in the election — were not felons at all. The majority of these voters were African-American, and as African-Americans predominantly vote Democratic, the situation suggested foul play
If conservatives are in charge of the first vote and every recount thereafter then why would dems be so persistent about getting those recounts or "verifications" knowing they're efforts would go nowhere.
But that isn't the case.
Those supposedly and theoretically "in charge" of the recounts are NOT those counting the votes themselves. And in every recount votes for dems seem to mysteriously materialize out of thin air, especially after a lengthy effort by the loser (a democrat) to attain the verification... hmm, that's weird.
And this Choicepoint.. where are the convictions? Where are subpoenas? There's something missing and I'll try to find out what it is.
On top of all that, looking through wikis sources I'm not surprised I feel like somethings being left out. I see a lot of known slanted papers.
It is no wonder almost all exposed voter fraud has been attempted by leftists.
