I will just give up because you don't understand that 255 not in shape doesn't mean more muscle than 247 in ridiculous shape but anyway.....
....if you are going to quote editors of magazines how about Johnny Fitness's take on the 1998 pre-judging and how Ronnie was overlooked in the first round which is why he only won by 3 points. He won rounds 2-4 with a perfect score, what, he changed so much between rounds?
Also Peter McGough is incredibly biased towards Dorian, i remember when Ronnie came in at 283 in 2003 he trashed him and asked what he was doing to gain so much muscle so quick (when previously he had just dieted down too much - so he didn't gain 40 pounds in a year - a concept you already have shown you don't understand) but when Dorian hit 257 in 1993 he just had more drive and focus than anyone else. Pure Bias.
I will just give up because you don't understand that 255 not in shape doesn't mean more muscle than 247 in ridiculous shape but anyway..
No you can't grasp he didn't put on ANY size by dropping weight thats an oxymoron , size wasn't an issue for Ronnie he was 260 pounds by 1996 his main problem was overall great conditioning . I admitted at 255 pounds his conditioning was lacking hence why he dropped all the excess fat & water and came in supersharp in 98 but he didn't put any size in 98 just dropped weight that was hurting his conditioning , again one doesn't get bigger by getting smaller but he did LOOK bigger because he was sharper
....if you are going to quote editors of magazines how about Johnny Fitness's take on the 1998 pre-judging and how Ronnie was overlooked in the first round which is why he only won by 3 points. He won rounds 2-4 with a perfect score, what, he changed so much between rounds?
This has nothing to do with editors it was to do if it was a close contest and judging after the fact it was the FINAL score which matter the most Ronnie beat Flex by just 3 points and thats all that matters , I'm NOT disputing the win , Ronnie was the winner but to say it wasn't a close contest is an outright lie
Also Peter McGough is incredibly biased towards Dorian, i remember when Ronnie came in at 283 in 2003 he trashed him and asked what he was doing to gain so much muscle so quick (when previously he had just dieted down too much - so he didn't gain 40 pounds in a year - a concept you already have shown you don't understand) but when Dorian hit 257 in 1993 he just had more drive and focus than anyone else. Pure Bias.
Where you're going with this is beyond me , I posted the quote NOT as a Dorian V Ronnie thing it has to due with the fact that when you're supersharp you LOOK superbig hence why Ronnie APPEARED big at 247 pounds than he did the previous year it was NOTHING to do with Yates , in the quote he says he thinks ( thought ) Ronnie was better how is that biased towards Yates? lol if anything it proves he's completely UNBIASED because if he was , he'd just say Yates is the best ever and never even mention Ronnie
And Ronnie was 287 in 2003 and he didn't trash him I have the editorial and he said that he thinks Ronnie went to lengths he shouldn't have in order to get to that weight and how he looked much better lighter , and the difference between Yates from 92-93 wasn't 40 pounds it was 13 pounds big difference ( no pun ) and Yates was already hards as nail in 93 at 269 pounds he just dieted away muscle he didn't gain any new muscle pre sa he just didn't come in depleted like he did in 92 at 244 pounds
