Author Topic: Thoughts on PETA?  (Read 1202 times)

TrapsMcLats

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2801
  • Lift Heavy. Lift Hard.
Thoughts on PETA?
« on: May 08, 2008, 04:17:44 PM »
I for one think this group is too extreme to make a real impact and i don't agree with many of their stances.  Anyone else have thoughts on this?


~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
Re: Thoughts on PETA?
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2008, 04:34:41 PM »
They are for no animals for anything.  Not pets, food, work, nothing.   They are extreme and they do nothing to help animals despite taking in all this money from donations.

   They have exposed and brought to light some things, but unfortunately people see the name PETA and they judge the message by the messenger which doesn't help animals. 

  They do more harm than good IMO.  I take what they say with a grain of salt and try and research myself and see if I can find more unbiased sources to back it up.
   
   Same for the HSUS.  They take money but don't spend it on animals, just on promoting themselves and they have made false claims and taken donations.  They are still being investigated (I believe it hasn't been settled?) about donations they took for Hurricane Katrina that never could be accounted to helping any animals.

   They are more about the money than the animals.

TrapsMcLats

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2801
  • Lift Heavy. Lift Hard.
Re: Thoughts on PETA?
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2008, 05:09:15 PM »
You are very correct Flower.

Vet

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1679
  • Immortal
Re: Thoughts on PETA?
« Reply #3 on: May 08, 2008, 10:38:19 PM »
You are very correct Flower.

Yup. 

I've had some bad experiences with PETA.  Those experiences convinced me that as a group, they dont' give two shits about the actual animal.  Its all about publicity and promoting their clouded ideas. 


The HSUS has gone down hill big time over the last few years.   And they are just as bad as PETA in many respects. 

~flower~

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3597
  • D/s
Re: Thoughts on PETA?
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2008, 05:18:03 AM »
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Cory Johnson (614) 888-4868 ext.
214
May 8, 2008 Sharon Hayden (614) 888-4868 ext. 226

Animal Rights Group Dupes Donors Into Believing It Takes Care of Animals

(Columbus) - When regional retailer, Meijer, received pressure from sportsmen to sever ties with the animal rights extremists in the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), some questioned why the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance (USSA) acted to oppose the partnership.

“Most people simply don’t know that the HSUS is actually an animal rights organization that is opposed to any use of animals for the benefit of humans,”
said USSA president and CEO Bud Pidgeon. “The public deserves to know the
hidden agenda behind this is to deceive them.”

On April 24, 2008, HSUS, the world’s largest animal rights organization,
announced a partnership with Meijer, a regional discount retail chain to raise
$5,000 for the organization’s fund to address the purported problem of
abandoned pets as a result of the national home foreclosure crisis.

The USSA, a national organization founded to protect the rights of
sportsmen, responded with an alert asking hunters to contact the retailer to protest the partnership. Meijer quickly responded by canceling the arrangement.
Since that time, some animal welfare activists have questioned why USSA would
oppose a partnership alleged to benefit pets.

The Washington DC-based HSUS, raised $100 million dollars according to its
2006 IRS filing. Despite a name that seems tailor made to animal shelters,
HSUS is in fact an animal rights organization. Its main function is to change
laws that permit Americans to gain any benefit from animals. It advocates
for restrictions on livestock farmers, bans on life-saving medical research
performed on animals and opposes zoos, circuses and rodeos. Of course HSUS also opposes hunting. The HSUS does not operate or represent the local dog and cat shelters that exist across the United States.

“With a name like the Humane Society of the United States, it’s easy to see
why some people believe that there is a connection between it and local
animal shelters, which struggle every year to make ends meet,” explained Pidgeon.“HSUS spends the bulk of its money on making contributions to politicians,lobbying, lawyers and expensive 30-second advertisements to promote voterissues aimed at banning various uses of animals.”

The Humane Society uses campaigns, such as the Meijer campaign, as a public
relations tool to help it raise its $100 million dollar war chest for its animal rights crusade. Evidence of this is contained within its leadership. Wayne Pacelle, CEO of the organization, is the former executive director of the Fund for Animals, which was the nation’s leading anti-hunting group. Upon accepting the executive job at HSUS, Pacelle announced a merger with the Fund for Animals and quickly hired its most ardent hunting opponents as his top management staff.

The HSUS then swallowed several anti-livestock organizations, hiring their
leadership as well. Its takeover of the Doris Day Animal League has given it
access to Hollywood dollars, previously the home turf of the radical People
for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

Unlike PETA, however, Pacelle and HSUS are not interested in making a large
public relations spectacle using naked models or making outrageous statements
comparing the Holocaust to the slaughter of chickens. Instead, HSUS has
launched a series of campaigns that put it in a positive light with animal
lovers in general.

Such was the case in 2005, when HSUS created a fund to aid animals stranded
as a result of Hurricane Katrina. Later, the Louisiana Attorney General’s
office launched an investigation of HSUS when allegations surfaced that the
money never made it to the pets in need.

In 2007 it launched a campaign to address the issue of so-called “puppy
mills,” abusive large-scale commercial dog breeding operations. Using
sentimental images of suffering puppies, the organization is backing legislation in
Pennsylvania that would devastate small hobby breeders, dog show kennels and
sporting dog enthusiasts. The legislation is so radical that it has been
opposed by the American Kennel Club, United Kennel Club and even dog rescue
shelters in the state.

“Taking advantage of the American people’s love for their pets, HSUS is
able to deceive donors and the public into believing that the organization is in
the mainstream of American values,” said Pidgeon. “It is this mainstream
image that allows HSUS to raise its 100 million dollar budget to take our
hunting and fishing rights away. At the same time, by deceiving animal lovers,
HSUS robs financially strapped dog and cat shelters of critical funds needed
to actually look after abandoned and abused pets.”

The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance recommends that people who want to help real
animal shelters give to their local shelter organizations.

“Some animal rights groups masquerade as pet shelters, so donating to a
local organization gives the contributor the opportunity to determine how their
funds will actually be spent,” said Pidgeon.

The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance is a national association of sportsmen and
sportsmen’s organizations that protects the rights of hunters, anglers and
trappers in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress and through
public education programs. For more information about the U.S. Sportsmen’s
Alliance and its work, call (614) 888-4868 or visit its website,
_www.ussportsmen.org_ (http://www.ussportsmen.org/) .