Author Topic: The Transformers. (Read 13551 times)

RZA · « **Reply #5 on:** September 17, 2008, 05:52:36 AM »

D-bol is a helluva drug! That's one. Two: how come the only guy who looks better before than after is poor ol' Nasser? (Actually, I'm being mean. If you had posted a pics of Flex in '93 and say '99, I would have made the same comment)

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #6 on:** September 17, 2008, 05:57:52 AM »

Quote from: RZA on September 17, 2008, 05:52:36 AM

D-bol is a helluva drug! That's one. Two: how come the only guy who looks better before than after is poor ol' Nasser? (Actually, I'm being mean. If you had posted a pics of Flex in '93 and say '99, I would have made the same comment)

I made b4 a comp. bet. Flex 93 and 97 and 4 sure he looked better in 93..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #7 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:02:00 AM »

Quote from: RZA on September 17, 2008, 05:52:36 AM

D-bol is a helluva drug! That's one. Two: how come the only guy who looks better before than after is poor ol' Nasser? (Actually, I'm being mean. If you had posted a pics of Flex in '93 and say '99, I would have made the same comment)

By the way still Flex of 99 was better thn Ronnie.. I feel that Ronnie's personality is better but on stage Flex always had the better body..

RZA · « **Reply #8 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:04:57 AM »

I beg to differ. Flex had hhis chance in '98 but fucked up his conditioning. In '99, he looked like a parody of his former slef, delts smelled oil a mile away and his conditioning was even worse than the previous year. Cormier should have been second and showed a more pleasing physique than Ronnie. But Ronnie outmassed him by too big a margin.

johnny1 · « **Reply #9 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:06:02 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 05:44:46 AM

2

Great comparison pics there of Dorian, amazing how his body changed though the years even at a higher BW when he hit the thigh and ab pose he 9 times out of 10 looked Impressive, couple of rare pics there also of Milos, and Nasser who looked better b4 he threw all that mass on him.

RZA · « **Reply #10 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:07:23 AM »

Is that '81 Franco there? 'Cause that looks like some bad gyno.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #11 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:09:56 AM »

Quote from: RZA on September 17, 2008, 06:04:57 AM

I beg to differ. Flex had hhis chance in '98 but fucked up his conditioning. In '99, he looked like a parody of his former slef, delts smelled oil a mile away and his conditioning was even worse than the previous year. Cormier should have been second and showed a more pleasing physique than Ronnie. But Ronnie outmassed him by too big a margin.

Ronnie was always a big monster but I never liked his body.. His calves were very small (not only 4 him but 4 any pro. bb even 4 Lee Labrada),.. his ab was bloated (Dorian's ab was bloated too but 4 me it looked better thn Ronnie's),.. also his chest looked bad in the relaxed pose.. By the way wht is wrong wth Nasser's "after" pics.?? I belive he looked v. good..

johnny1 · « **Reply #12 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:13:18 AM »

Quote from: RZA on September 17, 2008, 06:04:57 AM

I beg to differ. Flex had hhis chance in '98 but fucked up his conditioning. In '99, he looked like a parody of his former slef, delts smelled oil a mile away and his conditioning was even worse than the previous year. Cormier should have been second and showed a more pleasing physique than Ronnie. But Ronnie outmassed him by too big a margin.

Agreed, Flex certently looked bigger than he ever did, but those delts sure looked full of something other than muscle and his calves were alittle suspect also, his 1993 A/C shape or Maybe even his 1992 USA shape would have been a better chance against Big Ron in 1999.

RZA · « **Reply #13 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:15:06 AM »

Lighterweight Nasser= better proportions, much better waist, more vascularity. I'm not a big Coleman fan but I do think he showed up great in '98. '99 was pretty impressive too and from then on he declined except on certain occasions like the 2001 AC. After that, he just looked like garbage to me.

Monster_Everything · « **Reply #14 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:19:52 AM »

thats not megatron

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #15 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:25:13 AM »

Quote from: johnny1 on September 17, 2008, 06:06:02 AM

Great comparison pics there of Dorian, amazing how his body changed though the years even at a higher BW when he hit the thigh and ab pose he 9 times out of 10 looked Impressive, couple of rare pics there also of Milos, and Nasser who looked better b4 he threw all that mass on him.

Hi Johnny,

Wht is wrong with Nasser's mass

.. He is big and cut in these pics..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #16 on:** September 17, 2008, 06:29:24 AM »

Quote from: RZA on September 17, 2008, 06:15:06 AM

Lighterweight Nasser= better proportions, much better waist, more vascularity. I'm not a big Coleman fan but I do think he showed up great in '98. '99 was pretty impressive too and from then on he declined except on certain occasions like the 2001 AC. After that, he just looked like garbage to me.

Most of the big guys can't maintain their good wast when they add more size.. Same story with Dorian and Ronnies, not just Nasser.. Also put in mind that 2 of the above Nasser's (after) pics were during the off season..