Author Topic: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.  (Read 35642 times)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #75 on: August 31, 2009, 01:41:15 PM »

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #76 on: September 02, 2009, 08:21:32 PM »
He eats a lot of crow, but the King did leave a the sport with something.   He was a very enteraining poser to many. 
((-::

GetItOnNY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2421
  • Getbig!
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #77 on: September 26, 2009, 05:39:22 AM »
I respect King Kamali for being and IFBB, pro, and getting hisw pro card.But thank god I didnt see this pic 20 plus years ago when I first started training.If I saw this body I would never want to ever pick up a weight.In my opinion the natural guy looks 10 times better and doesnt do any drugs.When I saw this pic of King I honestly thre up in my mouth.In this pic he looks terrible.
Has bodybuilding taken a turn for the worse?Wehn a natural guy look better then a athlete on a ton of drugs?

lax

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #78 on: September 28, 2009, 01:01:58 PM »
I respect King Kamali for being and IFBB, pro, and getting hisw pro card.But thank god I didnt see this pic 20 plus years ago when I first started training.If I saw this body I would never want to ever pick up a weight.In my opinion the natural guy looks 10 times better and doesnt do any drugs.When I saw this pic of King I honestly thre up in my mouth.In this pic he looks terrible.
Has bodybuilding taken a turn for the worse?Wehn a natural guy look better then a athlete on a ton of drugs?

in fairness
why don't you use a pic of Kamali in shape instead of one in which he is bulked?

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #79 on: September 29, 2009, 08:01:00 PM »
Moody looks unbelievable in the latest training vid with Palumbo. Amazing genetics. Makes you wonder just exactly what they use- as they claim they are "natural..."

ngm21084

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1008
  • D.I.L.L.I.G.A.F.
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #80 on: September 29, 2009, 08:57:25 PM »
man i dont want to flame on moody or anything or be a "hater" but NATURAL?? seriously???....i just find it very difficult to believe....

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #81 on: September 29, 2009, 09:34:33 PM »
man i dont want to flame on moody or anything or be a "hater" but NATURAL?? seriously???....i just find it very difficult to believe....


So does everybody...

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #82 on: September 30, 2009, 09:28:51 AM »
where is the natural ???
tank u jesus

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19276
  • Getbig!
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #83 on: October 15, 2009, 07:27:06 AM »
I respect King Kamali for being and IFBB, pro, and getting hisw pro card.But thank god I didnt see this pic 20 plus years ago when I first started training.If I saw this body I would never want to ever pick up a weight.In my opinion the natural guy looks 10 times better and doesnt do any drugs.When I saw this pic of King I honestly thre up in my mouth.In this pic he looks terrible.
Has bodybuilding taken a turn for the worse?Wehn a natural guy look better then a athlete on a ton of drugs?

You're posting an off-season pic of Kamali (pale) and a tanned contest pic of Moody. That doesn't quite make sense.


BigSexy50

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 372
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #84 on: October 16, 2009, 09:02:20 AM »
Why does Kamali continue to pose with his feet facing out? His legs lack sweep, and are over powered by the teardrop and inner thigs. If he just pointed his toes forward, the outer head of the quad would be more visible. Giving the illusion of more sweep.

pugalist666

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1402
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #85 on: December 04, 2009, 02:24:41 AM »
Why does Kamali continue to pose with his feet facing out? His legs lack sweep, and are over powered by the teardrop and inner thigs. If he just pointed his toes forward, the outer head of the quad would be more visible. Giving the illusion of more sweep.
doing it that way hurts my vagina

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #86 on: December 04, 2009, 06:45:46 PM »
I respect King Kamali for being and IFBB, pro, and getting hisw pro card.But thank god I didnt see this pic 20 plus years ago when I first started training.If I saw this body I would never want to ever pick up a weight.In my opinion the natural guy looks 10 times better and doesnt do any drugs.When I saw this pic of King I honestly thre up in my mouth.In this pic he looks terrible.
Has bodybuilding taken a turn for the worse?Wehn a natural guy look better then a athlete on a ton of drugs?
What you do in your mouth is your business.  The people you say who look better than King will never be pro's in the IFBB.
((-::

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #87 on: December 04, 2009, 06:47:21 PM »

So does everybody...
I never gave a rats ass. :P
((-::

ronbrgundy

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 188
  • You stay classy
Re: King Kamali 2009 Off-Season.. 296 lbs.
« Reply #88 on: December 11, 2009, 11:21:12 PM »
King you look big.  Ignore the negative nancys.