Author Topic: Meg Whitman, Hewlett-Packard Executive, Hits the Trail... again  (Read 65021 times)

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #25 on: February 17, 2009, 08:25:20 AM »
Meg Whitman's first hurdle - state's male GOP
Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
(02-16) 17:18 PST --

Former eBay CEO Meg Whitman is Republican, and proud of it, but as she seeks center stage in her party's nomination for the 2010 governor's race, there is a potentially deadly problem lurking in the wings.

It's the California Republican Party.

In diverse, cutting-edge California - the nation's most populous state - the Grand Old Party has been anything but grand to women eyeing a future in politics.

Though California Democrats were the first to elect two female U.S. senators - Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein - and boast the nation's first female Speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Republicans have little to brag about.

They have never chosen a woman as a gubernatorial candidate, a U.S. Senate candidate - or even as party chair.

And in the state Legislature, the picture is no better: California's Republican Senate contingent this year welcomed a lone woman - ending an eight-year drought
- and just four GOP assemblywomen join her.

"California Republicans generally treat all females like they're the party's women's auxiliary," said Garry South, the political consultant for San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who is also exploring a run for governor. "They're fine to help out in the kitchen and answer campaign phones, but don't try to run for statewide office or, God - the Father, of course - forbid, run the show.

"Unless they change their public face and their attitude," he said, "they'll never be competitive among women voters here."

As she unveiled her gubernatorial campaign last week, Whitman, a billionaire Silicon Valley executive who has never run for public office, acknowledged the rough road ahead for a candidate aiming to go where no woman has gone before in the nation's largest Republican organization - to the top.

"We need to bring back women into the Republican Party, first and foremost," Whitman said in an interview with The Chronicle. "And as we bring back women into the party, we have to think about how we can get more women to run."

Already, Whitman's plans - she was a decline-to-state voter until September 2007 - have excited and energized some of the most active GOP women in the state, such as former state Assemblywoman Sharon Runner of Lancaster (Los Angeles County), a co-chair of Whitman's campaign.

"Hopefully, the year of the woman is 2010 - when Meg becomes governor," she said...

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/02/17/MNKA15SADP.DTL

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #26 on: September 29, 2009, 10:41:31 AM »
in a recent press conference, Meg Whitman admits that, in effect, she hasn't voted in 28 years!  Yet now she wants to be governor?  Um, no.



http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=48475

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #27 on: September 30, 2009, 01:15:22 AM »
she looks like a weirdo

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #28 on: October 03, 2009, 06:35:10 AM »
Whitman supported GOP nemesis Boxer in '04
Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
 
Meg Whitman, the 2010 GOP gubernatorial candidate already on the defensive for her embarrassingly poor voting record, once endorsed and actively supported Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, one of the most proudly liberal politicians in California.

Whitman not only endorsed Boxer and donated the maximum $4,000 to the junior California senator's 2004 re-election campaign, but the former eBay CEO also served on an exclusive committee of Technology Leaders for Boxer in her re-election battle against Republican California Secretary of State Bill Jones, according to election records obtained by The Chronicle.

Whitman, in a 2003 Boxer campaign statement, spoke strongly on Boxer's half, calling her "a courageous leader and friend of California's technology industry." She also signed an "open letter" appealing to Silicon Valley executives, calling Boxer a leader on issues such as her opposition to an Internet sales tax.

Boxer fought internet taxes

Boxer campaign aide Rose Kapolczynski confirmed that Whitman was among a group of influential Silicon Valley business people approached by the Boxer campaign in 2003 and "she agreed to endorse the senator. ... There was a fundraising event in Silicon Valley later in the year and Whitman maxed out to the campaign." Whitman spokeswoman Sarah Pompei, asked to explain the action, said Whitman "has supported members of both parties who fought against Internet taxes. ... At the same time that Barbara Boxer was fighting against Internet taxes, which earned Meg Whitman's support, (state Insurance Commissioner) Steve Poizner was arguing for tax increases to support transportation projects and cover budget shortfalls in Sacramento."

The campaign of Poizner, competing with Whitman for the GOP nomination, seized on the issue.

Whitman's "history of not voting for 28 years, and then jumping into politics by endorsing Democrat Barbara Boxer, is going to disqualify her with Republicans," said Poizner spokesman Jarrod Agen. "The idea that she would represent Republicans at the top of the ticket in California is laughable."

Gop loyalists concerned

Jon Fleischman, a California Republican Party vice chairman and publisher of the influential Flashreport.org, a GOP Web site, said Whitman's explanation for supporting Boxer - reviled by Republicans for her tireless support of liberal causes - will concern many GOP loyalists.

"What she really needs to say is there is no excuse. There's no acceptable reason why any Republican should support a socialist like Barbara Boxer," he said. "This woman is trying to raise every tax in America."

Last weekend, at the state GOP convention, Whitman assured grassroots activists that her poor voting record didn't detract from solid Republican credentials.

"I'm a Republican, and you'll find I'm a darn good one," she said. "I've committed myself to running for one of the toughest chief executive jobs on the planet because I believe Republican ideals, truly and consistently applied, will save this state."

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #29 on: October 05, 2009, 02:47:10 PM »
The arrogance may be Whitman's
The political novice who would be governor calls state workers 'selfish and arrogant.' That isn't a sound management practice.
George Skelton

From Sacramento
One of the more damning and insulting words in the family dictionary is "arrogant." It's normally used behind the subject's back. In public, it should be deployed guardedly, even by a politician.

Generally, when someone tosses around that adjective, the hurler had better be on solid ground and not living in a glass house, or mansion.

So it was a bit grating recently to read that billionaire political novice Meg Whitman had called state civil servants "selfish and arrogant" in officially announcing her candidacy for the Republican gubernatorial nomination.

She repeated virtually the same derogatory description of state workers at the California Republican Party's convention the next weekend in Indian Wells.

Whitman didn't call them civil servants, of course. She used the time-tested conservative, red meat pejoratives "bureaucrats" and "bureaucracy."

This is how she put it to supporters at her formal campaign kickoff in Fullerton:

"Every year, we pay more to sustain an out-of-control state bureaucracy -- a wasteful bureaucracy, out of touch with the needs of Californians. And a selfish and arrogant bureaucracy, unwilling to give an inch even in the toughest of economic times."

Never mind that most state employees are enduring three unpaid furlough days a month, a roughly 14% wage cut saving the state $2.2 billion this fiscal year. The workers don't like it, but they're not yet marching on picket lines.

For months, Whitman has been promising to slash the state payroll "by at least 40,000 employees," returning it to the level of 2004, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's first year in office.

Well, good luck with that.

The state workforce totals about 363,000 full-time equivalent slots, according to the Finance Department. Of those, however, only 203,000 are under the governor's control. The other 160,000 are controlled by, for example, the universities, the retirement systems, the judiciary and the Legislature. Whitman would be powerless to lay off professors, investment managers, court clerks or legislative aides.

No problem, her campaign says. She'd use the governor's line-item veto power to cut budgets by the equivalent salary amounts and force the universities, for example, to choose between firing professors and raising student fees. Again.

The biggest employment growth under the governor's control -- in fact, in all of state government -- has been in the prison system. Roughly 16,000 employees have been added since 2004, the administration says, because of court orders, prison population increases and enforcement of Jessica's Law, a 2006 voter-approved restriction on where paroled sex offenders can live.

At the Republican convention, Whitman announced she'd exempt prison guards, highway patrol officers and firefighters from her layoff notices. So that reduces her potential firing pool by at least 48,000.

She realizes that 40,000 workers can't be laid off immediately, her campaign says. The down-sizing is a first-term goal. She'll figure it all out after she takes office.

Right! This I know: Any significant payroll slashing -- in fact, the fulfilling of other campaign promises as well -- would require a cooperative workforce. And running for the boss job by calling the worker bees selfish and arrogant isn't a sound management practice, whether in the public or the private sector.

A governor or CEO shouldn't be beholden to any union or employee group. And certainly labor leaders can be arrogant. But the workers should be treated civilly, with respect, particularly if they're not threatening you.

Moreover, who is Whitman to be calling civil servants arrogant? What's her credibility? How many times has she even stepped inside a state office except to schmooze a governor?

"Bureaucrats" have always been easy political targets. But so is Whitman.

I don't know her and have no idea whether she comes across as arrogant in person. She can be charming on TV. Some of her ideas sound good.

But some people might consider it arrogant to think you're qualified to be governor of the nation's most populous, most complex state despite never having served in any government position. Not on a school board or even a local commission.

Being the chief executive of EBay is very impressive. But it's no substitute for having acquired knowledge and honed political skills by tussling with city councils or serving in some lower level elective office -- and constantly operating in the public glare while trying to peddle your ideas.

California's political graveyards are littered with wannabe governors who fantasized about using their vast fortunes to buy the top job without first paying any dues.

And not only did Whitman shun the political ladder, she has hardly ever used the ballot box. Or the convenient absentee ballot. Now 53, she didn't even register to vote until 46, the Sacramento Bee reported. She didn't become a Republican until two years ago.

An "atrocious" record, Whitman now admits. "I was focused on raising a family, on my husband's career, and we moved many, many times. It is no excuse. My voting record . . . is unacceptable."

Yes. And this is what the record indicates: Whitman felt she had more important things to do than participate in democracy's most basic civic duty. She couldn't be bothered. Had little interest in public policy.

Now she wants to be governor. Is that arrogant?


If Whitman wants to whack the public payroll, that's a legitimate policy debate. But ridiculing middle-class workers as arrogant smacks of arrogance in itself. It's definitely cheap political demagoguery.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39865
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #30 on: October 05, 2009, 02:59:45 PM »
The arrogance may be Whitman's
The political novice who would be governor calls state workers 'selfish and arrogant.' That isn't a sound management practice.
George Skelton

From Sacramento
One of the more damning and insulting words in the family dictionary is "arrogant." It's normally used behind the subject's back. In public, it should be deployed guardedly, even by a politician.

Generally, when someone tosses around that adjective, the hurler had better be on solid ground and not living in a glass house, or mansion.

So it was a bit grating recently to read that billionaire political novice Meg Whitman had called state civil servants "selfish and arrogant" in officially announcing her candidacy for the Republican gubernatorial nomination.

She repeated virtually the same derogatory description of state workers at the California Republican Party's convention the next weekend in Indian Wells.

Whitman didn't call them civil servants, of course. She used the time-tested conservative, red meat pejoratives "bureaucrats" and "bureaucracy."

This is how she put it to supporters at her formal campaign kickoff in Fullerton:

"Every year, we pay more to sustain an out-of-control state bureaucracy -- a wasteful bureaucracy, out of touch with the needs of Californians. And a selfish and arrogant bureaucracy, unwilling to give an inch even in the toughest of economic times."

Never mind that most state employees are enduring three unpaid furlough days a month, a roughly 14% wage cut saving the state $2.2 billion this fiscal year. The workers don't like it, but they're not yet marching on picket lines.

For months, Whitman has been promising to slash the state payroll "by at least 40,000 employees," returning it to the level of 2004, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's first year in office.

Well, good luck with that.

The state workforce totals about 363,000 full-time equivalent slots, according to the Finance Department. Of those, however, only 203,000 are under the governor's control. The other 160,000 are controlled by, for example, the universities, the retirement systems, the judiciary and the Legislature. Whitman would be powerless to lay off professors, investment managers, court clerks or legislative aides.

No problem, her campaign says. She'd use the governor's line-item veto power to cut budgets by the equivalent salary amounts and force the universities, for example, to choose between firing professors and raising student fees. Again.

The biggest employment growth under the governor's control -- in fact, in all of state government -- has been in the prison system. Roughly 16,000 employees have been added since 2004, the administration says, because of court orders, prison population increases and enforcement of Jessica's Law, a 2006 voter-approved restriction on where paroled sex offenders can live.

At the Republican convention, Whitman announced she'd exempt prison guards, highway patrol officers and firefighters from her layoff notices. So that reduces her potential firing pool by at least 48,000.

She realizes that 40,000 workers can't be laid off immediately, her campaign says. The down-sizing is a first-term goal. She'll figure it all out after she takes office.

Right! This I know: Any significant payroll slashing -- in fact, the fulfilling of other campaign promises as well -- would require a cooperative workforce. And running for the boss job by calling the worker bees selfish and arrogant isn't a sound management practice, whether in the public or the private sector.

A governor or CEO shouldn't be beholden to any union or employee group. And certainly labor leaders can be arrogant. But the workers should be treated civilly, with respect, particularly if they're not threatening you.

Moreover, who is Whitman to be calling civil servants arrogant? What's her credibility? How many times has she even stepped inside a state office except to schmooze a governor?

"Bureaucrats" have always been easy political targets. But so is Whitman.

I don't know her and have no idea whether she comes across as arrogant in person. She can be charming on TV. Some of her ideas sound good.

But some people might consider it arrogant to think you're qualified to be governor of the nation's most populous, most complex state despite never having served in any government position. Not on a school board or even a local commission.

Being the chief executive of EBay is very impressive. But it's no substitute for having acquired knowledge and honed political skills by tussling with city councils or serving in some lower level elective office -- and constantly operating in the public glare while trying to peddle your ideas.

California's political graveyards are littered with wannabe governors who fantasized about using their vast fortunes to buy the top job without first paying any dues.

And not only did Whitman shun the political ladder, she has hardly ever used the ballot box. Or the convenient absentee ballot. Now 53, she didn't even register to vote until 46, the Sacramento Bee reported. She didn't become a Republican until two years ago.

An "atrocious" record, Whitman now admits. "I was focused on raising a family, on my husband's career, and we moved many, many times. It is no excuse. My voting record . . . is unacceptable."

Yes. And this is what the record indicates: Whitman felt she had more important things to do than participate in democracy's most basic civic duty. She couldn't be bothered. Had little interest in public policy.

Now she wants to be governor. Is that arrogant?


If Whitman wants to whack the public payroll, that's a legitimate policy debate. But ridiculing middle-class workers as arrogant smacks of arrogance in itself. It's definitely cheap political demagoguery.

Shes' 100% correct.  The public sector is perhaps the main reason most states, like NJ, NY, CT, MA are going broke and cant pay their bills anymore. 

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #31 on: October 29, 2009, 09:13:38 AM »
Meg Whitman's radio whoppers
The Republican candidate for California governor peddles two falsehoods about state spending and taxing in the very first radio ads for the 2010 race.
by George Skelton

We instinctively grant latitude to advertisers, whether they're peddling politicians, dog food or miracle paring knives. But we do expect that an ad will not flat-out lie.

Sadly, our expectations often fall short when ambitious politicians are pitching themselves.

Neither major party has a lock on truthfulness. I've written about false advertising by Republicans and Democrats alike for years.

Now, in the very first series of radio ads in the 2010 gubernatorial race, comes blatant baloney from billionaire political novice Meg Whitman, the former chief executive of EBay who is running for the Republican nomination.

"Did you know," Whitman asks radio listeners, "that in the last 10 years, state spending has gone up 80%?"

Well, no, I did not know that. So I did some checking.

"They're completely wrong when they say that," replied state Finance Director Mike Genest, a conservative former budget consultant for Senate Republicans.

It doesn't take much digging to learn that general fund spending "in the last 10 years" has risen just 27%, according to finance department data. Adjusted for inflation and population growth, spending actually has decreased by 16.6%.

The Whitman camp got its 80% figure -- it's really 78%, but close enough -- by counting a different 10 years than "the last 10." It backed up a couple of years and counted the period between fiscal 1998-99 and 2007-08, ending with the highest general fund spending in history, $103 billion.

Since then, the budget has been slashed to $84.6 billion for the current fiscal year.

Logic tells us that Whitman strategists used the earlier 10-year period because the 80% figure has a nice dramatic ring.

But campaign spokesman Tucker Bounds insists it was because 2007-08 was the last budget year for which the books have been officially closed. Those numbers are permanent and solid, he says. "Most Californians would agree that's a fair and accurate measure."

No, I suspect most people really would prefer that the gubernatorial candidate be straight-up about which years she is measuring. If it's not "the last 10 years," don't claim that it is.

Even for the period that Whitman minions measured, when inflation and population growth are factored in, spending climbed 16.5% -- not nearly as dramatic as her reported 80%.

Actually, the Whitman team could have generated an even more eye-catching number by using a base fiscal year of 1997-98, which seems the better way to do it. That would measure 10 full years of spending growth, rather than the nine calculated by Whitman. . And it would show an increase of 95%.

Using Whitman's nine-year yardstick, spending has risen only 8.4% in "the last 10," not 27%.

But this has ventured too deeply into thick weeds. Let's move on to another bit of baloney in the Whitman ad that is running all over the state.

"These days," the candidate intones, "Sacramento does the same old thing over and over. Their only solution is to raise taxes and spend more money."

I've already showed that they're spending less money, not more.

In fact, over the current and last fiscal years, projected spending -- the amount that would have been paid out without changes in laws -- has been whacked by $31 billion. So their "only solution" is not to tax and spend.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the Legislature did raise taxes by $12.5 billion last February.

But contrary to Whitman's ad -- and a widely held myth -- it was the first major state tax increase since the candidate's campaign chairman, Pete Wilson, raised taxes as governor in 1991. The Wilson tax hike was temporary, as is the current one.

Before 1991, you've got to go way back to 1967, Ronald Reagan's first year as governor, to find another major state tax increase -- not counting the millionaire income, tobacco and gas tax hikes that voters have imposed through ballot measures.

More often, the state has cut taxes -- the vehicle license fee, business loopholes, income taxes through dependent credits.

Here is some more data from the state finance department that refutes the "spend more" charge: Under Schwarzenegger, the average annual growth in general fund spending has been only 1.3% -- compared to 6.3% for Gray Davis, 4.6% for Wilson, 8% for George Deukmejian, 12.7% for Jerry Brown, 13.6% for Reagan and 11.7% for Pat Brown.

The big spending, for whatever reason, was back in the 1960s and '70s. And the state's still trying, not very successfully, to survive off those investments.

The radio ad fibs may seem like a small thing, but it's in the public's interest to keep the campaign dialogue as honest as possible.

It's also in the candidates' interest because it goes to their credibility.

I doubt Whitman ran any numbers herself. She probably just read what some overheated campaign staffer handed her.

But if the candidate for governor had been paying any attention to state government, she should have known that the ad was unbefitting bunk.

Given Sacramento's dire condition, the facts are enough condemnation. Candidates don't need to embellish, let alone prevaricate. It makes them look like just another politician.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #32 on: November 03, 2009, 10:05:08 PM »
Meg Whitman's campaign spending is causing a stir
The Republican gubernatorial candidate in California has doled out $19 million so far, with the election still seven months away. Her pace is called 'unprecedented' by one campaign veteran.
By Shane Goldmacher

The radio ads have aired daily across the state since she declared her bid for governor in September.

"I'm Meg Whitman," one begins, "and I want to talk to you about California. . . ."

The costly airtime -- with the primary election still seven months away -- is just one way the former eBay chief is spending the $19 million of her personal fortune that she has plowed into the race.

The first-time candidate, a Republican, has also paid for an army of advisors, pricey plane rides and a big technology tab. She spent $6 million in the first half of the year.

That sum dwarfed the combined spending of all the other gubernatorial hopefuls: two fellow Republicans, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner and former Congressman Tom Campbell; and two Democrats, state Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown and San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom. Newsom quit the race Friday.

Whitman has publicly floated the notion of a record-shattering $150-million campaign budget. That number is turning heads, even among campaign veterans accustomed to deep-pocketed politicos blowing through millions at a time.

Whitman's pace is "unprecedented spending for a California gubernatorial race," said Jude Barry, campaign manager for the last mega-rich candidate to run for governor, Steve Westly.

She spent almost as much on chartered jets ($111,706) as Campbell spent in total ($147,030) from January through June, the latest financial reporting period. Her Internet operation cost nearly $1 million. "Nowhere near that has been spent in the past in any campaign that I've ever seen," veteran GOP consultant Richard Temple said of Whitman's Web platform.

The Poizner campaign, in comparison, spent $106,000 on technology.

Whitman spared no expense wining and dining contributors -- racking up a nearly $11,000 catering bill at one late May fundraiser that drew 33 attendees.

"We have a budget that's designed for victory," said Whitman spokesman Tucker Bounds.

Poizner spent a total of $1.55 million through June. Newsom spent $1.47 million and Brown $170,000.

Whitman's net worth is estimated at $1.2 billion. That wealth has translated into big paychecks for campaign consultants.

While most candidates have a small corps of highly paid strategists, Whitman has dozens of advisors on monthly retainers that totaled more than a half-million dollars in June alone.

Her media strategists at Scott Howell & Co. collected $300,000 through June. Henry Gomez, a confidant from her eBay years, pulled in $108,000, records show. A half-dozen other aides and advisors each earned more than $20,000 per month.

Whitman has spent nearly as much on staff and consultants ($2.66 million in the five months ending in June) as mega-millionaire Westly did on personnel in his entire 2006 campaign ($2.95 million).

Darry Sragow, a Democratic strategist who ran Northwest Airlines magnate Al Checchi's 1998 campaign for governor, said a billionaire running for governor is like "catnip" to political professionals.

"How does [Whitman] feel about being seen as an ATM machine by a lot of political consultants?" Sragow asked. "She may not care."

In addition to her own wealth, Whitman has raised $7.7 million in contributions this year, far more than either Republican rival or Brown. Poizner has raised $1.07 million, Campbell $455,000 and Brown $4.15 million, campaign records show.

Whitman's financial firepower, of course, helped catapult the political neophyte to the top tier of candidates. And in a state the size of California -- where an October Field Poll said 68% of residents had no idea who she is -- her money will be key. It can buy TV ads, pay for field offices and build name recognition.

It's all "essential to winning," said Bounds, and will help spread Whitman's "message of cutting spending, growing jobs and fixing education."

The Poizner campaign says Whitman is trying to buy her way into office.

"There are the standard parts of running for office that she's skipping," said Poizner spokesman Jarrod Agen, citing her refusal to engage in early debates and her spotty voting record. "Instead, she's just writing checks."

Poizner is no pauper himself. He sold a high-technology company for $1 billion in 2000, and plunged $12 million of his fortune into his 2006 election as insurance commissioner.

Californians are not always swayed by extravagant campaign spending.

"The political fields are littered with dead bodies of rich candidates," Temple said.

Westly spent $35 million of his own money before losing the primary election in 2006. Checchi burned through $40 million in his race, also losing in the primary.

"If [Whitman] loses, then she recklessly overspent. If she wins, then the extra money was obviously very well spent," said Dan Schnur, director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at USC. "We won't know the answer until election day."

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #33 on: February 08, 2010, 10:55:18 AM »
Whitman putting her money where her campaign is
Phillip Matier,Andrew Ross

Republican gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman talks a lot about how politicians need a "new attitude" when it comes to excessive spending - but apparently not when it comes to the former eBay exec's own campaign spending.

According to campaign records, Whitman spent $294,103 in 2009 on charter jets to shuttle her to meetings, appearances and fundraisers at such locations as the five-star Hotel Bel-Air in Beverly Hills, the Lodge at Torrey Pines in La Jolla (San Diego County), and the Princeton and Harvard clubs in New York.

In all, Whitman spent $526,015 on fundraising events, including $12,252 on star chef and caterer Wolfgang Puck. Another $311,000 was shelled out for meetings and appearances, including $22,698 to Hartmann Studios - the same high-tech theatrical outfit that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger used for his "shock and awe" campaign stunts.

And when it comes to her campaign bureaucracy, you couldn't get much fatter.

In all, Whitman spent $5.2 million last year on 40 consultants and fundraisers, some of whom made as much as $75,000 a month. And that doesn't include her campaign staff of 41.

Other items on the Whitman spending list:

-- $672,000 on polling, which is about what it costs to conduct 20 statewide surveys.

-- $2.9 million to set up and maintain her Web site.

-- $3.8 million on radio ads.

On the other hand, Whitman's equally wealthy Republican rival, Steve Poizner - who flies Southwest - spent $1.5 million on consultants, $151,000 on his Web site and $65,000 on personal appearances and fundraisers.

Aides to Whitman, who is running 30 points ahead of Poizner in the polls, make no apologies for their gold-plated spending.

"We have a budget designed to win in the June primary and to build a top-quality campaign on every level, and we will continue to do so," said campaign spokeswoman Sarah Pompei.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #34 on: April 30, 2010, 09:55:32 AM »
Whitman lacks public service background
by Carla Marinucci
 
(04-29) 20:55 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- Standing on stage with GOP luminaries John McCain and Mitt Romney last week at a Bay Area fundraiser for her gubernatorial campaign, Meg Whitman recited her mantra for why she wants to be the state's chief executive: "I refuse to let California fail."

Whitman's oft-stated passion about California's future raises a key question: Outside of the executive suite, what causes has she supported in recent years to help the state succeed?

The Republican gubernatorial candidate and former CEO of eBay gave $30 million to establish Whitman College at Princeton University - the campus she and her sons attended - and started a family foundation with her husband, neurosurgeon Griffith R. Harsh IV.

But compared with other leading Silicon Valley and political figures, Whitman appears to have otherwise invested less time, energy and clout on causes at the state, local and national level - until she began to dabble in politics two years ago and said she intended to invest as much as $150 million to become California's next CEO.

Her book, "The Power of Many," and her campaign Web site mention the 53-year-old candidate's rise from the finance group Bain Capital to top marketing positions at Stride Rite, Hasbro and FTD. She served for a decade as head of eBay and was included in Time magazine's 2005 list of the top 100 people who have shaped American lives.

No causes mentioned

In contrast to others who have aspired to political office, however, Whitman does not mention any work on commissions, boards, advisory groups, charities or causes in her book or on her Web site. She has acknowledged what she's called an atrocious voting record, and until she ran for office, it appears she wrote no opinion pieces to express her views on key issues facing the state.

More than a month before the June 8 primary, Whitman's relative lack of advocacy and activity could be an issue with civic-minded California voters - many of whom are "working three jobs and serving on the PTA themselves," says Barbara O'Connor, professor of political communication at Cal State Sacramento.

"One of the things you evaluate a candidate on is their history of public service - it's a window into someone's value system," O'Connor said. "And that's what we expect from people (in politics) - that no matter how you do or how rich you are, you pay it forward."

Whitman stands in contrast to many top California politicians who established an activist profile as private citizens, including Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (physical fitness, a 2002 initiative for after-school programs), Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Poizner (teaching, charter schools) and U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina (women's economic development in developing countries).

In the Silicon Valley executive stratosphere, many of Whitman's key supporters - including Cisco Systems CEO John Chambers and venture capitalist Floyd Kvamme - have been active advocates for issues like education, science and technology.

Adviser to politicians

As eBay's CEO, Whitman was tapped to advise British Labor Party Prime Minister Gordon Brown, then-chancellor of the exchequer, on trade. She counseled President George W. Bush on technology issues - and served on a committee called "Technology Leaders for Boxer" to endorse Sen. Barbara Boxer in 2004.

Today, she argues that her background qualifies her to provide fresh vision and the experience to "run California like a business." Her platform says she will reduce the state government workforce by 40,000 people, create 2 million jobs in the private sector and implement targeted tax cuts to boost business.

She declined to be interviewed for this story.

"Meg's political activism is consistent with her story of engaging at a new level as a result of what she experienced and saw firsthand at eBay," said Tucker Bounds, Whitman's campaign spokesman. "She identified a need for real change in the business climate in California that is often burdened with troublesome regulation, taxation and barriers to the type of growth needed for job creation and prosperity."

An unusual status

But others say billionaire Whitman's record on civic engagement underscores her unusual status as the wealthiest political candidate ever in California - she already has broken state records for spending.

"This is the new extension of a trend we've seen in the last 20 years in California regarding outsiders running for office," said Bruce Cain, director of UC Berkeley's Institute for Governmental Studies Washington Center.

In the past, he said, candidates with no political experience "felt they should prepare themselves for running by at least voting or writing opinion pieces - or in (Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's) case, getting involved in an initiative and getting to know people that way."

But Whitman is "taking it one step further, coming out of the cold completely with respect to civic engagement - and just running on your business credentials," he said. "It was inevitable ... and if you have the money, you can do it."

'Nontraditional routes'

Lisa Hetfield, interim director of the Rutgers' University Institute for Women's Leadership, says the rookie political candidate's life may underscore how "people are taking nontraditional routes to higher office. And certainly, for the benefit of leadership, we ought to be open to all kinds of talent and diversity."

In addition, voters today may be more likely to "look at each candidate and think about that experience and the current context - what is needed now," Hetfield said. It's possible that Whitman is being held to a different standard than men who "regularly make this leap," she added.

In 2006, she and her husband created the Griffith R. Harsh IV and Margaret C. Whitman Charitable Foundation, which she said at the time would focus on health care and education issues.

The charity, to which Bounds said she has donated nearly $87 million, made news in 2007 for investing $4 million in hedge funds based in the offshore tax havens of Bermuda and the Cayman Islands. The next year, to the dismay of GOP conservatives, the charity donated mostly to liberal causes, including a $1.5 million gift to Colorado's Telluride Valley Floor Preservation Partners, a group formed to protect the area from development.

Whitman's charity also gave $200,000 to the Environmental Defense Fund for work in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

As late as January 2008, Whitman made no mention of her political interests, telling CNBC as she left eBay that she planned to "work on our family foundation that we just set up - and take a little time off and rest."

Getting involved

But she became a national finance chairwoman for the 2008 presidential campaign of Romney, her longtime mentor from Bain Capital and son of the late George Romney, the former American Motors CEO who became Michigan's governor. Whitman later signed on as adviser to presidential candidate McCain.

Since then, her biography notes that she has "personally contributed to and participated in numerous get-out-the-vote efforts on behalf of congressional and legislative candidates."

In February 2009, Whitman announced her campaign to be governor of California. "Mitt and John inspired me to actually think beyond my business career, '' she said, "and how I might contribute to California and its future."

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #35 on: October 03, 2010, 12:29:19 PM »
SF CHRONICLE RECOMMENDS
Jerry Brown for Governor

A vote for experience over a big leap of faith
Sunday, October 3, 2010

Adaptability has always been Jerry Brown's strength and weakness as a politician. The positive view would be that he is not a captive of ideology: When circumstances demand change, such as when voters upended California's tax structure with the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978, Brown changes. The young governor embraced the revolt and helped make Prop. 13 work. The negative interpretation would be that Brown can never quite be counted on to stay in the same place, physically or philosophically.

A certain level of tolerance for improvisation will be required of the next governor, who will face a still-sputtering economy, a structural deficit in the billions of dollars and a Legislature that can't seem to make the tough decisions to pass a balanced budget. According to the state controller, the state has been operating in the red since July 2007.

Brown would inspire more confidence in his ability to lead the state out of its fiscal quagmire if he were more specific about what he planned to do. In his meeting with our editorial board, he to have concrete ideas in the three-ring binder he put on the table - but he never opened it or discussed them in any detail.

He argued that opening his budget plans to public scrutiny during the campaign would galvanize the opposition before the process could start. He insisted he would bring legislators together, engage in the process with more intensity and endurance than any governor in memory and push for a consensus on tough decisions that could be sent to the voters for approval on the ballot-required moves in a spring special election.

Say this for Brown, who served as governor from 1974 through 1982: He is well aware of the political and personality conflicts that make it difficult to get anything done in the state Capitol.

Brown's claim that "If you're looking for frugality, I'm your man," is supported by his history. His tightfistedness during his governorship did not make him popular within the Capitol and helped build the $5 billion surplus that led to the tax revolt by Californians who didn't like the state holding onto more money than it needed.

While Democrat Brown has deep ties with labor and environmental groups, he is anything but a pawn of either. He has proposed a two-tier pension system for public employees and, as he noted in Tuesday's debate, he twice vetoed pay-raise packages when he was governor. His largely successful mayoral effort to bring residential life to downtown Oakland as a key step toward revitalization required him to court developers and waive environmental rules in a way that rankled some of his core allies.

Longtime Brown watchers know that his bursts of energy and idealism are sometimes followed by periods of inattention and drift, but there is no question of his ability to navigate past political barriers and use the bully pulpit effectively.

The same could not be said of his Republican opponent, Meg Whitman, the former eBay CEO whose platform consists of platitudes and ideas that would be nonstarters (cutting 40,000 state workers, shifting $1 billion from welfare to higher education) for even the most inspirational of leaders. Her tightly controlled campaign, heavy on soft-focus ads and light on engagement in substantive exchanges, leaves us wondering whether she has the skills or even the temperament to move or co-opt the forces that would be out to undermine her. Does she really know what she would be encountering in the rough-and-tumble of Sacramento?

Brown does. At 72, there is no doubt about his energy or preparedness for a second act in a difficult job at a difficult time. He gets our endorsement in an imperfect but critical choice between a politician Californians know too well and one they barely know.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #36 on: October 03, 2010, 12:31:12 PM »
LA TIMES RECOMMENDS
Jerry Brown for governor
To a state desperate for leadership, he brings the seen-it-all-before wisdom of a political veteran.
October 3, 2010

For its next governor, California is in dire need of a dynamic and optimistic grownup, one with the personality, perspective and presence to remind voters that theirs is a fabulously wealthy state and not the downward-spiraling mess that national media reports delight in comparing to Greece or Portugal. We need someone with a Reaganesque talent for revealing to ourselves our own exceptionalism and dismissing the self-doubt of the last decade. We need a Pat Brown or Earl Warren-style focus on our future, with investment in education and infrastructure. And we need a leader deft and clever enough to move Californians away from a three-decade pattern of undermining our own government, checking and counterchecking ourselves with selfish initiatives to lock up special program spending, lock out political decision-making and accountability and lock in a perpetual and destructive budget standoff, year after year.

Fate presents the state instead with two candidates who fall well short of our current needs. They come to us from the partisan political version of Central Casting. Republican Meg Whitman, utterly devoid of background or experience in state government or policymaking, rarely deigning to cast a vote, moves toward the Nov. 2 election on the power of millions of dollars of personal wealth. Whitman argues that her role as chief executive of the online auction website EBay somehow makes her the right person to govern the nation's most populous state, yet her slate of policy positions is seemingly more calculated to win the approval of angry voters and profit-seeking business leaders than to address the actual problems facing the state. Then we have Democrat Jerry Brown, the governor of California's baby-boom youth, now seeking the office again more than 30 years after his first run, having advanced on a personal and public journey that made him at times a gadfly outsider, a stolid party leader, a spiritual seeker, a presidential candidate, a nuts-and-bolts mayor of a troubled city and the senior statesman of Sacramento.

We will have to wait for the governor with the talent and courage to shake the state loose from the structural dead-ends into which voters continue to push it. In the meantime, we must choose between Whitman, with her disappointing and empty policy approaches and her assertion that having no experience in government is the best experience, and Brown, whose nonlinear, unscripted style sometimes leaves his listeners wondering what exactly they're going to get. Again, Brown is not the ideal candidate for California, but what he does bring is the reality-based, seen-it-all-before wisdom of a political veteran, and of the two candidates before voters in November, The Times endorses him without hesitation.

Whitman has built her campaign on a checklist of popular but in the end incorrect and cliche-ridden assumptions about California's current condition and what got us here. Illegal immigration is a real and serious issue, but Whitman's solutions range from adding National Guard troops at the border — although illegal crossings directly into California account for little of the problem — to denying higher education or job opportunities to tens of thousands of children brought to the state by their illegal immigrant parents. To Whitman, it makes sense to educate those children in public schools so that they are incorporated into U.S. society, but then when they become adults to cut them loose with no place to go and no chance at earning anything but the most basic living. It is an approach that reflects the high emotional charge of the immigration issue, but none of the understanding that a leader needs of the nuances.

Whitman also takes a CEO's approach to cutting expenses, asserting that she will lay off 40,000 state workers but failing to acknowledge that California's public-worker-to-resident ratio is already among the nation's lowest, and that further slashing the workforce merely moves our dysfunction from one arena to another by slowing state responsiveness without fixing the underlying structural problem. She targets welfare, zeroing in on the resentment that working Californians feel for supposed freeloaders, but she exhibits little understanding of the role that state social services play in keeping society intact in times of distress.

Whitman also completely misses the lessons of the Schwarzenegger governorship, arguing that the current governor started out on the right foot with his vows to "blow up the boxes" of government but then lost his nerve or interest. A candidate paying closer attention would recognize that Schwarzenegger — who unlike Whitman already had some background in politics and policymaking and was no stranger to Sacramento — grew into the job, moved the state past decades of gridlock to launch a major program of rebuilding infrastructure, accomplished key objectives in defusing partisan power and attempted to recapture the state's leadership, sometimes successfully (as with greenhouse gas emissions), sometimes merely getting the ball rolling (as with healthcare reform).

Brown, too, jumps far too quickly at the chance to echo populist sentiment. His campaign promise to reject any new taxes unless they are approved by a vote of the people would only deepen California's governmental stalemate. His assertion that the Legislature will buckle down and make hard decisions if only he lays out all the information before it sounds naive.

But Brown offers a different kind of leadership, and although it might not be our first choice, it will do. Rather than the dynamic leader of new ideas from the 1970s, Brown comes to us now as a sort of grizzled mechanic of the state's failing machinery. He knows which parts can hold out a few more weeks, which rattles can be ignored and how much tension the timing belt can handle before it fails.

Brown knows that the state's top expenses are public education, health and safety, and that none of those programs can be eliminated but that there are short-term efficiencies and long-term structural changes that can keep each operating for another generation. He has a good grasp of the degree to which labor unions can be weaned from unsustainable health and pension entitlements and, likewise, which regulations the state can ease to attract business and which cannot be touched without affecting California's quality of life.

Californians must choose. One candidate is a stranger to the political and governmental landscape; the other knows every superhighway, back road and dead-end. We opt for real-world experience, know-how and creativity. The Times urges a vote for Brown.

Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #37 on: October 03, 2010, 12:39:21 PM »
Mercury News editorial: Whitman's actions speak volumes about her character
Mercury News Editorial

The past two days have raised deeply troubling questions about the character and honesty of Meg Whitman, the Republican nominee for governor. Even if you believe her version of the story about her undocumented housekeeper, the disconnect between Whitman's actions and her statements on the campaign trail are disturbing.

Whitman on Wednesday said that in 2009 she fired her housekeeper of nine years, Nicandra Diaz Santillan, after learning of her legal status. Diaz Santillan, however, says the Whitman family had known since at least 2003, and that she was let go only when she asked for legal help in the midst of Whitman's campaign for governor.

Celebrity attorney Gloria Allred on Thursday presented a government letter to Whitman and her husband, Dr. Griff Harsh, asking about a discrepancy between Diaz Santillan's Social Security number and her name. The letter included a handwritten note Allred said was from Harsh, saying, "Nicky, Please check this," raising doubts about Whitman's denials that she and her husband knowingly employed an undocumented worker.

The Whitman camp won't confirm or deny the authenticity of the letter but says Harsh does not recall it. Besides, a spokesman said, it wouldn't have been a red flag because the family believed Diaz Santillan was in the country legally, and the letter only indicated concern that she wouldn't get proper benefits.
This is a laughable story. The most plausible explanation is that Harsh received the letter and passed it on to Diaz Santillan, even though it clearly should have raised suspicions and he and Whitman had an obligation to respond.

This wouldn't be an issue if not for Whitman's campaign pledge -- which she repeats over and over -- to "hold employers accountable." Plenty of businesses say they've been duped by forged documents; should they be let off the hook, too?

Her campaign keeps saying this is all a political smear driven by Allred and her ties to Jerry Brown. But there isn't a shred of evidence to back that claim. Whitman should put up or shut up.

This matter also calls Whitman's basic decency into question. She says she didn't report Diaz Santillan to the authorities because she was a "member of my extended family." And yet Whitman -- a billionaire willing to spend $119 million and counting to win the governor's office -- wouldn't pay a few hundred dollars for a consultation with an immigration attorney when Diaz Santillan asked for help? At her news conference Thursday, Whitman essentially accused Diaz Santillan, someone she trusted in her home and with her children for nine years, of stealing her mail.

Whitman could have made herself a far more credible candidate by using this experience to inform her positions on immigration. She started out saying she supported a path to citizenship -- perhaps still thinking of her former housekeeper's plight -- but backtracked to win the Republican primary. Whitman understands firsthand the legal and emotional complexity of immigration. That she chose to ignore that knowledge and instead base her campaign on consultant-fed talking points tells all you need to know about her character.

Copyright © 2010 - San Jose Mercury News

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #38 on: October 03, 2010, 01:10:46 PM »
Anyone will be better than Arnold.

He let his wife tell him what to do and the state suffered.   

That's what everyone was saying about Bush and look what we got.  Be careful what you wish for...

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #39 on: October 03, 2010, 01:16:45 PM »
THE SACRAMENTO BEE RECOMMENDS
Jerry Brown best pick for governor

Every contest for governor is crucial, but the stakes couldn't be higher for California during this year's Nov. 2 election.

The state's finances, economy, schools and institutions of higher learning all hang in the balance. In choosing between Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown, voters will need to decide which candidate has the best combination of policies, life experiences and capabilities to pull the state from this crisis and set it on a path of recovery.

Fortunately, voters do not need to choose between shades of gray in this contest. There are clear differences between Brown and Whitman.

Whitman comes from a business background. Brown has spent nearly his entire career as a politician. Whitman is more scripted and efficient. Brown shoots from the hip and the lip. Whitman is a student of what other states are doing to grow business. Brown shows little interest in such scholarship. Whitman only recently showed an interest in matters of civic life, such as voting. Brown can hold forth for hours on the origins of laws and the people who shaped them.

The attraction of Meg Whitman is that, as an outsider, she isn't yet imprisoned by the culture of low expectations that permeates the Capitol. She exudes a sense of possibility, and in many areas, offers a credible critique of what is wrong with California.

Unfortunately, many of her prescriptions for fixing California are flawed on their own. By contrast, Jerry Brown offers a road map for recovery that is much more in tune with California's values. Brown has also made a compelling case for why he would be a more effective leader than Whitman, which is why The Bee recommends Brown for governor.

Consider how the two candidates stand on the No. 1 issue of the day – the dismal economy, joblessness and the state's chronic fiscal problems.

Whitman proposes to freeze regulations and cut taxes, including the state capital gains tax. The former eBay CEO claims this will spur investment in California and grow jobs and state revenues.

Yet there are big problems with this plan. Capital gains generate between $3 billion and $11 billion in revenue yearly for California. Losing that revenue would put California in a deeper hole, with little guarantee that beneficiaries (mainly wealthy people who invest in stocks) would reinvest in the state. Perhaps some would, but others would park their money elsewhere. On this score, Whitman's plan is extremely risky.

Whitman is also calling for a $15 billion reduction in state spending and elimination of 40,000 state jobs (through attrition and layoffs), even while increasing spending on higher education by $1 billion. How would she do this? It isn't entirely clear.

Nor is it clear how she'd go about eliminating 40,000 state jobs without including public safety agencies, including corrections. Since 1980, the biggest jump in state employment has been in the prison system – from 13,100 to 65,600 employees. The number of state employees working in health and human services actually dropped during that period – from 43,300 to 32,500.

Whitman slams Brown for a jobs plan that is vague and full of platitudes about "green jobs," a fair critique. But Brown is more realistic than Whitman about what a governor can accomplish, given that California's fortunes are interdependent with the larger national and international economies. Government's role, as Brown sees it, is to provide the basic building blocks of commerce – roads, ports, rail, education and job training – and recognize California's unique strengths. Brown sees huge opportunity in making the state a leader in renewable energy and efficiency, partly by cutting regulation and consolidating overlapping permitting agencies. He is also open to reducing or eliminating the sales tax on manufacturing equipment, an unusual position for a Democrat.

While Whitman vows to help restore California's lost luster, too often her policy prescriptions show a lack of compassion for the state's poor and working poor. She has yet to demonstrate how she can cut $1 billion from welfare without hurting children.

While we share her passion for reducing state pension obligations, she goes too far in advocating 401(k) plans that would expose state workers to the vagaries of Wall Street.

Coming into this campaign, the biggest question about Brown was his motivation for running and his potential level of engagement should he become governor again. Yet Brown has demonstrated in meetings and debates he is ready to take on new challenges, and is the best-equipped candidate to work with legislators to reform the budget process and cut through partisan squabbles over water, education funding, pension reform and other issues.

And unlike in previous stints in office, Brown doesn't seem to have his eye on anything other than governing California. That could well result in a Jerry Brown who is more focused, engaged and independent than we've seen before.


© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #40 on: October 03, 2010, 01:26:24 PM »
She says she didn't report Diaz Santillan to the authorities because she was a "member of my extended family."


Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh

She fired the illegal - but didn't report her?  Hmmmmm

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #41 on: October 03, 2010, 01:36:51 PM »
ol girl ugly as fuck

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39865
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #42 on: October 03, 2010, 02:24:46 PM »
ol girl ugly as fuck

As opposed to who?   Pelosi, boxer, feinstein, wasserman-schultz, DeLauro, Napolitano, Kagan, etc?

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #43 on: October 03, 2010, 06:04:13 PM »
Meg Whitman to Nicky, her beloved, "extended family member" maid: YOU'RE FIRED....
"From now on you don't know me, and I don't know you. You never have seen me and I have never seen you. Do you understand me?"
Kicked to the curb in a shockingly callous way...

That's Meg
::)


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #44 on: October 03, 2010, 06:09:28 PM »
 ::)


Nicandra Diaz Santillan meets the press with her lawyer, Gloria Allred, by her side.

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #45 on: October 03, 2010, 06:12:43 PM »
Is there anybody famous in Californial that Allred isn't somehow associated with?  She seems to pop up everywhere.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #46 on: October 03, 2010, 06:15:00 PM »
Missing the Whitman story
The media are ignoring the deeper issues in the gubernatorial candidate's alleged treatment of a former housekeeper.
by Tim Rutten

If you're following the gubernatorial campaign, you've heard little else over the past few days but the back and forth between Republican candidate Meg Whitman and her former housekeeper, Nicandra Diaz Santillan, an undocumented immigrant.

Calbuzz, a smart and irreverent website devoted to California politics, caught the essence of the coverage: "The latest dramatic chapter of the governor's race … finds the campaign of one of the richest women in California threatened by the comments of one of the poorest. Finally, a political story TV can understand."

Actually, a political story that much of the media — which has yawned and rolled their eyes through most of this campaign — can enthusiastically misunderstand might be closer to the mark. There's nothing particularly remarkable about the fact that the billionaire former EBay chief executive and her neurosurgeon husband employed an undocumented immigrant. At some point, most Californians knowingly or unknowingly employ a worker without papers or do business with someone who does. Merely going out to dinner, having your car washed or hiring a contractor to work on your house makes that so.

What really ought to concern people most are Diaz Santillan's allegations that during the nine years she worked for Whitman and her husband, they repeatedly forced her to put in more than her agreed-upon hours without compensation and refused to pay her mileage even though she had to use her own car to perform household errands. Whitman denies all this, but she does agree that she fired Diaz Santillan within days of the June 2009 conversation in which the housekeeper asked for help in legalizing her status. That may not be labor code-style mistreatment, but it's an odd way to treat somebody who'd worked in your home and taken care of your children for nearly a decade and who Whitman herself describes as "a member of our extended family." Lots of tough love, one surmises, in that house.

Diaz Santillan alleges that Whitman fired her in a phone call, saying: "From now on you don't know me, and I don't know you. You never have seen me and I have never seen you. Do you understand me?" With that, according to Diaz Santillan, Whitman hung up.

"She was," Diaz Santillan said, "throwing me away like a piece of garbage."

The facts of Whitman's relationship with Diaz Santillan remain to be sorted out, but we already know for certain that undocumented workers are treated like garbage — exploited as if they weren't human beings. They're forced into the shadows; darkness makes them vulnerable to every form of mistreatment.

The night the Whitman story broke this week, Cardinal Roger Mahony delivered a soberly compelling lecture at USC's Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies. His topic was the pressing need for comprehensive immigration reform.

Mahony speaks labor as fluently as he does Spanish. The problems of working people, particularly immigrants, have been a primary pastoral focus of his long priesthood. He knows the issue in all its dimensions, from the halls of Congress to the garment district shop floors and the fields of the Central Valley.

Comprehensive immigration reform, he argues, is both a moral and an economic imperative. The essence of our current situation, Mahony says, can be grasped by envisioning two signs posted along our southern border: One says, "Help Wanted;" the other, "No Trespassing."

It's an unworkable push-pull that demands, among other reforms, a well-administered guest-worker program to meet continuing labor needs, and a registration and restitution process for those already in the country without papers. In other words, precisely the sort of reforms that would make unlikely the kinds of abuse Diaz Santillan alleges she suffered in the Whitman household.

One of the realities Mahony cited was the fact that at least 70% of America's estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants already live in so-called blended families — that is, those in which one or more members is a citizen or legal resident. The percentage well may be higher here in California, where fully one-third of all workers are immigrants.

The human and economic complexities of such a situation are unlikely to get much of a hearing in a round of "gotcha" media coverage. But they would if the media compared the realities of Whitman's own household with her campaign speeches denouncing any path to citizenship for undocumented workers and urging more raids, fines and suspensions of business licenses for those who employ them.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #47 on: October 03, 2010, 06:15:28 PM »
Is there anybody famous in Californial that Allred isn't somehow associated with?  She seems to pop up everywhere.

I wish we could trade her to another country for a future draft pick.  

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19458
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #48 on: October 04, 2010, 06:20:30 AM »
"poof"  Did you hear that?  That's the sound of $120 million going up in smoke!

The lesson here is clear: be good to "the help" because they can always bring you down.  Meg could have so easily hired an immigration lawyer to help Nicky-- insteatd she fired her and told her "you don't know me and I don't know you."  Even better she could have paid her a nice chunk of change to disappear or even to go back to Mexico.  Instead she turned her out with nothing.  Big mistake... big... HUGE!

here's another example:  Ben Ladner was effectively stealing millions from American University while he was president and no one was the wiser.  But he was nasty to "the help."  He once told his chauffeur that he was not allowed to take a bathroom break while driving from NYC to Washington DC.  The chauffeur eventually penned an anonymous letter to the board of directors warning that Ladner's expense account was being abused.  Result: Ladner was fired!



Ben Ladner's Years of Living Lavishly
American University president Ben Ladner and his wife, Nancy, were behaving like billionaires—until their years of living lavishly caught up with them.
By Harry Jaffe

In January 2004, American University president Benjamin Ladner and AU board chair George Collins took their wives to St. John in the Virgin Islands.

In their roles as president and board chair, Ladner and Collins had become friends. They dined together after board meetings, sailed together, vacationed together.

When Ladner and his wife, Nancy Bullard Ladner, were looking for a second home, Collins and his wife introduced them to Gibson Island, an enclave on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Their wives, both with Southern roots, hit it off. Collins sponsored the Ladners for membership in the island’s tennis and golf club.

But by 2004 the mix of business and fun wasn’t always pleasant. Ladner was lobbying the board for a raise, and he couldn’t leave it in the boardroom. During the trip to St. John, Ladner kept talking about money.

At the time Ladner was making $880,750 a year, including base pay, bonus, and incentives. This put him among the nation’s best-paid college presidents. But he wanted more.

In a confidential memo to Collins, Ladner had made the case for a package of bonuses and investments that would have added $5 million on top of his base salary over the next five years. He would be making more than any college president in the nation.

“You’re not running a top-ten school,” Collins replied. “You don’t have a medical school. You’re not Harvard. You are not an investment banker, and you are very well paid.”

Ladner was beginning to disappoint Collins in other ways. Collins had pressed him for accurate measurements of student performance and how AU compared to other institutions. He found Ladner’s numbers “sloppy.”

On the St. John trip, Collins told Ladner that his proposed financial package was unlikely to be approved. And Collins thought to himself: We had better start looking for a new president...

http://www.washingtonian.com/2006/04/01/ben-ladners-years-of-living-lavishly/

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Ex-eBay CEO Whitman stirs up CA governor's race
« Reply #49 on: October 04, 2010, 06:28:02 AM »
"poof"  Did you hear that?  That's the sound of $120 million going up in smoke!

The lesson here is clear: be good to "the help" because they can always bring you down.  Meg could have so easily hired an immigration lawyer to help Nicky-- insteatd she fired her and told her "you don't know me and I don't know you."  Even better she could have paid her a nice chunk of change to disappear or even to go back to Mexico.  Instead she turned her out with nothing.  Big mistake... big... HUGE!

here's another example:  Ben Ladner was effectively stealing millions from American University while he was president and no one was the wiser.  But he was nasty to "the help."  He once told his chauffeur that he was not allowed to take a bathroom break while driving from NYC to Washington DC.  The chauffeur eventually penned an anonymous letter to the board of directors warning that Ladner's expense account was being abused.  Result: Ladner was fired!



Ben Ladner's Years of Living Lavishly
American University president Ben Ladner and his wife, Nancy, were behaving like billionaires—until their years of living lavishly caught up with them.
By Harry Jaffe

In January 2004, American University president Benjamin Ladner and AU board chair George Collins took their wives to St. John in the Virgin Islands.

In their roles as president and board chair, Ladner and Collins had become friends. They dined together after board meetings, sailed together, vacationed together.

When Ladner and his wife, Nancy Bullard Ladner, were looking for a second home, Collins and his wife introduced them to Gibson Island, an enclave on the western shore of the Chesapeake Bay. Their wives, both with Southern roots, hit it off. Collins sponsored the Ladners for membership in the island’s tennis and golf club.

But by 2004 the mix of business and fun wasn’t always pleasant. Ladner was lobbying the board for a raise, and he couldn’t leave it in the boardroom. During the trip to St. John, Ladner kept talking about money.

At the time Ladner was making $880,750 a year, including base pay, bonus, and incentives. This put him among the nation’s best-paid college presidents. But he wanted more...

http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/1714.html



Yes,employing someone for 9 years at 27 dollars an hour is darn near slavery and abuse.Poor poor little illegal.With the money that filthy wet back made why didnt she hire her own lawyer and get legal?