Are you suggesting we should kill those who are chanting death to America? I don't think you are.
It doesn't matter either way, its still wrong to kill someone for what they might grow up and do.
As far as death to children who die from war. If its deliberate, it's murder. If a soldier is walking down a street and sees a child of his enemy and shoots the child it's murder. If a plane drops a bomb on a weapons munition dump and a child gets killed it's collateral damage.
It's a very distinct difference with the same end result. The difference is intention and availability.
No I'm not. I'm illustrating that some of our enemies breed their children to hate us. We've both seen it.
But where would you draw the line when dealing with an enemy that trains their kids to engage in irrational acts of violence?
We effectively deliberately kill women and children in war all time because we know they will die when we engage in combat operations in or around residential areas.
I really don't see an intellectually honest distinction. Pointing a gun at a child of the enemy and pulling the trigger and dropping a bomb on the child's neighborhood designed to kill the child's parent still results in a dead child.
This reminds me of the discussions I've had regarding assisted suicide versus prescribing medication that will hasten a person's death. I had a lengthy disagreement with a doctor who is vehemently opposed to assisted suicide, but has no problem with prescribing medication to alleviate suffering, when the required dose results in death. He said the same thing you're saying: the difference is intent. I really view it as sort of a meaningless distinction. In both instances the patient dies and in both instances the doctor knows his actions will cause the patient's death. One method just allows the doctor to sleep better (and avoid losing his license, etc.).