The Dems' Wet Dream today

[240 is Back]

Cheney, with his epic 13% approval rating, will be speaking on behalf of the Repubs, following Obama speaking on the topic of terror and the wars.

He and a large group of invite-only repubs w ill watch obama's speech on the big screen.  Then he'll give his own speech.

The Dems gotta be loving this.  Instead of seeing some fresh-faced 2012 potential like pawlenty or Romney or huck or Barbour giving the speech, they have Darth Vader, one of the most hated men on earth, speaking for this party.  Cheney is even better than Rush, in the libs' eyes, as the face of the GOP.

[LurkerNoMore]

Cheney is a proven liar that has no credibility at all anyway.  Let me speak, vast majority of America has tuned out to anything he wants to whine about.

[BM OUT]

The differance will be Chenney kept Americans safe for the last 7.5 years while Obama has to rely on his community organising to come up with a policy.This is a battle of an incredible lightweight in Obama vs. a guy that knows more then Obama will ever know.

[240 is Back]

The differance will be Chenney kept Americans safe for the last 7.5 years

Cheney doesn't want to talk about that first year, huh? 

[LurkerNoMore]

The only thing Cheney knows how to do is LIE.

[BM OUT]

Cheney doesn't want to talk about that first year, huh? 

Hmmm,so your blaming Chenney for the attack after 9 months in office? When  Obamas  9  months in office are up are you going to blame him when the economy is still tanking?Or is this selective blaming going on.

[LurkerNoMore]

Economy tanked under Bush's term.  Not Obama's.

[BM OUT]

Economy tanked under Bush's term.  Not Obama's.

Its gotten MUCH worse under Obama.Is it his fault?Unemployment up,housing down etc etc.

[24KT]

Hmmm,so your blaming Chenney for the attack after 9 months in office? When  Obamas  9  months in office are up are you going to blame him when the economy is still tanking?Or is this selective blaming going on.

I hope someone remembers to bump this thread in 9 months. 

[240 is Back]

Hmmm,so your blaming Chenney for the attack after 9 months in office?

Bush and company were giving a memo 6 weeks before the attacks that pretty much told them what was gonna happen.

They chose to ignore it.  Why?

[Deicide]

Cheney is a proven liar that has no credibility at all anyway.  Let me speak, vast majority of America has tuned out to anything he wants to whine about.

We got Coach and Beach Bum here, don't forget.

[BM OUT]

Bush and company were giving a memo 6 weeks before the attacks that pretty much told them what was gonna happen.

They chose to ignore it.  Why?

This is left wing liberal nonsense.Just like when you a-holes say 9-11 was an inside job.Like the incompetant government could keep that a secret.They couldnt even keep Barry Bonds' grand jury testimony a secret but could have hundreads tell the same lie.STOP WATCHING A-HOLE like Olberman.

[LurkerNoMore]

This is left wing liberal nonsense.

So Condi Rice was lying when she testified about the memo and Bush's lack of interest in it?

[240 is Back]

This is left wing liberal nonsense.

wait, there was no Aug 5th memo?

Condi admitted it.  Is she a CT nut also?

[OzmO]

The differance will be Chenney kept Americans safe for the last 7.5 years while Obama has to rely on his community organising to come up with a policy.This is a battle of an incredible lightweight in Obama vs. a guy that knows more then Obama will ever know.

Cheney is a Jack ass and a liar.  "He" didn't keep America safe for 7.5 years.  America got attacked in 2001 and it made moves to prevent another attack involving hundreds of thousands of people and billions of dollars much of it wasted in Iraq.  It wouldn't have mattered who was president when 9/11 occurred, the same thing would have happened, except maybe the colossal WMD lie.

[240 is Back]

  It wouldn't have mattered who was president when 9/11 occurred, the same thing would have happened

Do you think Obama, upon being handed a memo labeled "Bin laden determined to attack" with details, would have ignored it?

Do you think his Sec of State Clinton, National security advisor, and other heads would have all ignored the document as well?

[Soul Crusher]

I hope someone remembers to bump this thread in 9 months. 

Dont you read Bloomberg or CNBC?

The economy is getting far worse, not better. 

[Bindare_Dundat]

Dont you read Bloomberg or CNBC?

The economy is getting far worse, not better. 

Jag has been smoking too many green shoots.

[Soul Crusher]

Jag has been smoking too many green shoots.

Some of the posters on this board amaze me with their willfull ignorance about what is going on with the economy. 

[OzmO]

Do you think Obama, upon being handed a memo labeled "Bin laden determined to attack" with details, would have ignored it?

Do you think his Sec of State Clinton, National security advisor, and other heads would have all ignored the document as well?

First off you should post exactly what was said with links.  You have a tendency to spin and embellish.

Second, we don't know what other intel they were receiving or the amount of other intel they were receiving.  Intelligence agencies process thousands of bits of info per day.    Aside from obtaining intel, deciding which in a real threat and which is not has to be a tough challange.

Thirdly, I was referring to what a president would have done after 9/11 regardless of who it was.

[LurkerNoMore]

wait, there was no Aug 5th memo?

Condi admitted it.  Is she a CT nut also?

Of course.  Condi is part of the far left liberal media nonsense.  She made that court appearance just to ..  just to... well, why?  Risk perjury just to make up some far left nonsense?  Way to go Condi.    

[The True Adonis]

First off you should post exactly what was said with links.  You have a tendency to spin and embellish.

Second, we don't know what other intel they were receiving or the amount of other intel they were receiving.  Intelligence agencies process thousands of bits of info per day.    Aside from obtaining intel, deciding which in a real threat and which is not has to be a tough challange.

Thirdly, I was referring to what a president would have done after 9/11 regardless of who it was.

Hope this helps.

Note the final paragraphs.

The following is a transcript of the August 6, 2001, presidential daily briefing entitled Bin Laden determined to strike in US. Parts of the original document were not made public by the White House for security reasons.

[LurkerNoMore]

Pwnage!

[240 is Back]

Thirdly, I was referring to what a president would have done after 9/11 regardless of who it was.

Okay.

Would Obama sit in a classroom reading a childrens book for 8 minutes after being given the news?

If the taleban offered to deliver Bin Laden dead or alive to America - provided we delivered evidence of his involvement as condi promised the sunday after 911 - would Obama have accepted?  

[OzmO]

Hope this helps.

Note the final paragraphs.

The following is a transcript of the August 6, 2001, presidential daily briefing entitled Bin Laden determined to strike in US. Parts of the original document were not made public by the White House for security reasons.

Does this document say where they will strike?  When?  How?

Does it say 19 hijackers are going to board these 4 Air planes, on this day on these flight numbers and then smash them into these buildings?

I couldn't read it very well, because my screen is crap here.  But it only said  OBL wanted to strike the USA.   So does half the middle east.

Hope this helps.

Oh yeah, and it doesn't help at all because form an intelligence and prevention stand point, that memo is about as ambiguous as it gets.