LOL @ Fox business channel advertising on MSNBC

[a_joker10]

higher poverty, higher incest, higher drop outs, higher convicts, etc..

This is the same stuff you posted about Alaska.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0297.pdf
Here are the crime rates by state.
Its independent of voting history.

By the way whats with you and incest.
Its a state thats not even tracked yet you claim some superior knowledge about it.

But then again its like most of your smear comments.
Post crap you know can't be proven and then call everyone out for not proving you wrong.

oh brother.

[LurkerNoMore]

Quit while you are ahead.  you have been owned again and need to go away to avoid further humiliation.   

You can only wish.

Apparently someone is trying to use Nielson ratings to compete with hard stats?  And you think I am owned?  No wonder you believe Zombieland USA is a reality.

Only part you got right there is that I am indeed, ahead.

Poverty level.
How many of the top ten are red states?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_per_bel_pov_lev-economy-percent-below-poverty-level

Should I continue to compare red states vs blue states after I return home tonight?  Or is this enough for you?

[Soul Crusher]

You can only wish.

Apparently someone is trying to use Nielson ratings to compete with hard stats?  And you think I am owned?  No wonder you believe Zombieland USA is a reality.

Only part you got right there is that I am indeed, ahead.

Poverty level.
How many of the top ten are red states?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_per_bel_pov_lev-economy-percent-below-poverty-level

Should I continue to compare red states vs blue states after I return home tonight?  Or is this enough for you?

It must be good to work the DMV and being able to leave at 4:30.  I just had lunch. 

[a_joker10]

You can only wish.

Apparently someone is trying to use Nielson ratings to compete with hard stats?  And you think I am owned?  No wonder you believe Zombieland USA is a reality.

Only part you got right there is that I am indeed, ahead.

Poverty level.
How many of the top ten are red states?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_per_bel_pov_lev-economy-percent-below-poverty-level

Should I continue to compare red states vs blue states after I return home tonight?  Or is this enough for you?

Moving the yardsticks again.

crime states don't pan out so now its poverty.
How about mean income or something else.

By the way you might want to look at those stats by the county.
Because there are some counties in New York that are the same sizes as whole states.

[body88]

You can only wish.

Apparently someone is trying to use Nielson ratings to compete with hard stats?  And you think I am owned?  No wonder you believe Zombieland USA is a reality.

Only part you got right there is that I am indeed, ahead.

Poverty level.
How many of the top ten are red states?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_per_bel_pov_lev-economy-percent-below-poverty-level

Should I continue to compare red states vs blue states after I return home tonight?  Or is this enough for you?

You just don't get it.  TV audiences and their qualitative information has nothing to do with state based stats.  For the third time....Nielson research is the currency that the entire TV industry uses for all it's demographic statistics and for the personal characteristics of their audiences.  Income, education - etc..  As I showcased plain as day on the last page, state demographics can have little to do with niche content (like you see on political TV stations). Every stat you posted means nothing to the TV industry since their universal research provider is Nielson.

[LurkerNoMore]

This is the same stuff you posted about Alaska.
http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/09s0297.pdf
Here are the crime rates by state.
Its independent of voting history.

By the way whats with you and incest.
Its a state thats not even tracked yet you claim some superior knowledge about it.

But then again its like most of your smear comments.
Post crap you know can't be proven and then call everyone out for not proving you wrong.

oh brother.

Did you even read the link you posted?  Because you just got assraped by your own link.  Might want to try a wee bit harder next time.

Directly from your link, the Top 10 States with Violent Crime

DC 1380
SC 767
TN 757
FL 709
Maryland 704
NM 646
NV 608
Alaska 632
Delaware 633
Louisana 597


Property Crime

Washington 4890
Arizona 4827
Hawaii 4800
DC 4490
SC 4370
TX 4319
TN 4300
NV 4246
etc..

Now exactly HOW many of the Top 10 are red states?  Bad enough getting pwned over something so simple, even worse when pwned by material you supplied yourself. 

Instead of asking me about incest, you should be asking your Republican friends.  After all, your side has the highest rate of rape and incest (Alabama and Alaska) locked down too.  So don't bother making excuses you can instead spend better time writing the publishers of the data and letting them know how inaccurate their findings are.  I am sure they, just like myself, will get a chuckle out of it.

[LurkerNoMore]

It must be good to work the DMV and being able to leave at 4:30.  I just had lunch. 

We've already had the little DMV conversation.  Didn't turn out great for you last time did it?

[LurkerNoMore]

You just don't get it.  TV audiences and their qualitative information has nothing to do with state based stats.  For the third time....Nielson research is the currency that the entire TV industry uses for all it's demographic statistics and for the personal characteristics of their audiences.  Income, education - etc..  As I showcased plain as day on the last page, state demographics can have little to do with niche content (like you see on political TV stations). Every stat you posted means nothing to the TV industry since their universal research provider is Nielson.

No, you don't get it.  Which is beyond me why you can't.  There shouldn't be any confusion whatsoever as I have stated twice before I am not refering to Nielson ratings.  But yet, that doesn't penetrate your bubble?  Ok... carry on. 

[Soul Crusher]

We've already had the little DMV conversation.  Didn't turn out great for you last time did it?

Oh thats right, the post office. 

[body88]

No, you don't get it.  Which is beyond me why you can't.  There shouldn't be any confusion whatsoever as I have stated twice before I am not refering to Nielson ratings.  But yet, that doesn't penetrate your bubble?  Ok... carry on. 

You're just making yourself look foolish here.  You said:

Quote from: body88 on Today at 10:04:18 AM
What proof do you have that Fox has dumb viewers? 

 

The stats of the target market they cater to (red states) says it all.

Again, the stats of the "target markets" mean nothing.  Second, who says Fox is targeting those markets?  Thats not how it works.  They target all major media markets.  Some are in red states, some are in blue states.  If your referring to Fox's audience, you must refer to Nielson data when trying to profile them, SINCE THE TV INDUSTRY SUBSCRIBIES TO NIELSON AS CURRENCY AND NOT "STATE DATA".  YOUR STATE DATA MEANS NOTHING WHEN REFERING TO A TV AUDIENCE.  IT'S NOT THAT HARD.

[Soul Crusher]

You're just making yourself look foolish here.  You said:
 

Again, the stats of the target market mean nothing.  If your referring to Fox's audience, you must refer to Nielson ratings when trying to profile them, SINCE THE TV INDUSTRY SUBSCRIBIES TO NIELSON AS CURRENCY AND THEIR DATA SAYS THAT WHAT YOU SAID IS INCORRECT.

Body - dont bother. 

Go look on the thread where we discussed Barney Franks' gay boyfriend running a prostitution ring out of the apartment.  Lurker denied my allegation and said I was wrong because the ring was run out of the apartment, and not the basement as I thought.  He/She/It could not realize that what he claimed was even worse since if it was run out of the basement maybe Frank could claim ignorance. 

Lurker is the king of spin, distraction, changing lines, etc.   

[a_joker10]

Did you even read the link you posted?  Because you just got assraped by your own link.  Might want to try a wee bit harder next time.

Directly from your link, the Top 10 States with Violent Crime

DC 1380
SC 767
TN 757
FL 709
Maryland 704
NM 646
NV 608
Alaska 632
Delaware 633
Louisana 597


Property Crime

Washington 4890
Arizona 4827
Hawaii 4800
DC 4490
SC 4370
TX 4319
TN 4300
NV 4246
etc..

Now exactly HOW many of the Top 10 are red states?  Bad enough getting pwned over something so simple, even worse when pwned by material you supplied yourself. 

Instead of asking me about incest, you should be asking your Republican friends.  After all, your side has the highest rate of rape and incest (Alabama and Alaska) locked down too.  So don't bother making excuses you can instead spend better time writing the publishers of the data and letting them know how inaccurate their findings are.  I am sure they, just like myself, will get a chuckle out of it.

your an idiot that can't read. I said that that the it wasn't a red or blue state thing.

As you can well see, Washington is a blue state and is leading in property crime. Of the top 5 listed 3 are blue states.
As for violent crime Florida, Nevada, DC, Maryland, Delaware all were blue states 50-50.
That information is directly from the US census not some slanted publisher.

There are no incest stats you moron.

[headhuntersix]

I'm sure Fox ignores New York and Boston, they're blue cities. It doesn't matter that they're the some of the top media markets in the country. Fox hate ignores all facts.

[LurkerNoMore]

crime states don't pan out so now its poverty.
How about mean income or something else.

How about :

States with highest rapes
http://www.swivel.com/graphs/show/17602366

How many of the top 10 are red states?

Poverty?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/eco_per_bel_pov_lev-economy-percent-below-poverty-level

How many of the Top 10 are red states?

Obesity?
http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/trends.html
http://calorielab.com/news/2008/07/02/fattest-states-2008/

Divorce?
http://www.statemaster.com/graph/lif_div_rat-lifestyle-divorce-rate

Teen Pregnancies?
Unwed pregnancies?
Anything else?

[LurkerNoMore]

Oh thats right, the post office. 

That was your second fall back.  That didn't go so well either. 

So let's move onto the third one.  Just like you did last time.

[LurkerNoMore]

You're just making yourself look foolish here.  You said:
 

Again, the stats of the "target markets" mean nothing.  Second, who says Fox is targeting those markets?  Thats not how it works.  They target all major media markets.  Some are in red states, some are in blue states.  If your referring to Fox's audience, you must refer to Nielson data when trying to profile them, SINCE THE TV INDUSTRY SUBSCRIBIES TO NIELSON AS CURRENCY AND NOT "STATE DATA".  YOUR STATE DATA MEANS NOTHING WHEN REFERING TO A TV AUDIENCE.  IT'S NOT THAT HARD.

You are the one looking foolish by continuing to insinuate anything I said was related to Nielson ratings.
Since I didn't, you are flailing empty air here.

[LurkerNoMore]

Body - dont bother. 

Go look on the thread where we discussed Barney Franks' gay boyfriend running a prostitution ring out of the apartment.  Lurker denied my allegation and said I was wrong because the ring was run out of the apartment, and not the basement as I thought.  He/She/It could not realize that what he claimed was even worse since if it was run out of the basement maybe Frank could claim ignorance. 

Lurker is the king of spin, distraction, changing lines, etc.   

Are you still clinging to that false dream? By the end of that thread, I already tossed out all your bullshit allegations.
You were pwned beyond belief until finally admitting what I stated all along.  Barney wasn't arrested.  He wasn't indicted.  He was barred. 

You got made into a little bitch on that thread.  Should I bump it to refresh your memory of how badly your lies were exposed?

[LurkerNoMore]

your an idiot that can't read. I said that that the it wasn't a red or blue state thing.

I can't read that sentence, but mainly because you're the idiot who wrote it.

Of course you didn't say it was a red or blue thing.  *I* did.  And I posted links to show stats supporting it.

Your link is from 2006 correct? Was FL red or blue 2006?  NV?  Hmmm...?

You just got assraped by your own link again and it's really getting to be pathetic. 

[body88]

You are the one looking foolish by continuing to insinuate anything I said was related to Nielson ratings.
Since I didn't, you are flailing empty air here.

I hope you've learned a good lesson here.  You were exposed.

[headhuntersix]

Subject matter experts mean nothing on this board. Cutting and pasting make everybody equal, just ask TA.

[LurkerNoMore]

I hope you've learned a good lesson here.  You were exposed.

The only thing exposed was your lack of reading comprehension.

But hey... you can try again later.  Perhaps with an arguement that actually pertains to something I really posted.

[body88]

The only thing exposed was your lack of reading comprehension.

But hey... you can try again later.  Perhaps with an arguement that actually pertains to something I really posted.

You've been exposed 

[LurkerNoMore]

You've been exposed 

Only as someone that "Republican Logic" (misdirecting, deflection, irrelevant replies, delusional reality) is ineffective against.

[Soul Crusher]

Only as someone that "Republican Logic" (misdirecting, deflection, irrelevant replies, delusional reality) is ineffective against.

Do I need to remind you of who you shill for???

[body88]

Only as someone that "Republican Logic" (misdirecting, deflection, irrelevant replies, delusional reality) is ineffective against.

No.  You've been exposed.