« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Down

Author Topic: Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength  (Read 31995 times)

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength
« on: July 11, 2009, 12:53:39 AM »
You repeatedly claim to "know" that his condition = impossible to attain without a "clean" diet and BBing drugs.

At the same time you claim to have great genetics for fatloss, and you admit to use drugs.

So why is it that you have not attained a condition close to Wavelengths in any of the pics you have posted? Is this knowledge derived from you thinking that if you can't go it ON drugs and with god-like genetics, then its impossible for him to do it? Or is it because you're a lazy man not able to get into a good condition because of your lack of dicipline?

Or did you once get really ripped back in 1972, before your computer crash? :D
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #1 on: July 11, 2009, 01:05:53 AM »
Quote from: Debussey DF on July 11, 2009, 12:53:39 AM
You repeatedly claim to "know" that his condition = impossible to attain without a "clean" diet and BBing drugs.

At the same time you claim to have great genetics for fatloss, and you admit to use drugs.

So why is it that you have not attained a condition close to Wavelengths in any of the pics you have posted? Is this knowledge derived from you thinking that if you can't go it ON drugs and with god-like genetics, then its impossible for him to do it? Or is it because you're a lazy man not able to get into a good condition because of your lack of dicipline?

Or did you once get really ripped back in 1972, before your computer crash? :D

Ohh, lets not forget that along with Spermballtastes superior genetics compared to Wavelength, it = pretty reasonable to believe that he uses MORE drugs than Wave if WaveSperm ever used them = highly unlikely anyway).

So with more drugs and better genetics, he has most likely not attained a similar condition.

Still he claims superior diet knowledge. 
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #2 on: July 11, 2009, 01:27:12 AM »
Where = your answer Spermy?

Just for clarification, it = unlikely to believe that your efforts = less than Wavy as well.

So more drugs, better genetics, better dieting knowledge, similar to or better effort, and STILL not as good condition as Wavelength.

What = missing here? (except from a few lost surprise pics of your 1972 condition) :D

Did Swerdlow pull one on ya? :D
Logged

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #3 on: July 11, 2009, 01:32:06 AM »
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #4 on: July 11, 2009, 01:35:04 AM »
Quote from: Mars on July 11, 2009, 01:32:06 AM


Maybe his critical thinking course at the Swerdlow school of reasoning was a hoax?  :D
Logged

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #5 on: July 11, 2009, 01:36:12 AM »
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength
« Reply #6 on: July 11, 2009, 02:10:13 AM »
Bump for Spermballtaste avoiding this topic and being scared to answer.
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #7 on: July 11, 2009, 02:13:33 AM »
Quote from: Debussey DF on July 11, 2009, 01:27:12 AM
Where = your answer Spermy?

Just for clarification, it = unlikely to believe that your efforts = less than Wavy as well.

So more drugs, better genetics, better dieting knowledge, similar to or better effort, and STILL not as good condition as Wavelength.

What = missing here? (except from a few lost surprise pics of your 1972 condition) :D

Did Swerdlow pull one on ya? :D
Yea I'd like to see those 1972 pics ;D
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #8 on: July 11, 2009, 02:15:19 AM »
Quote from: Mr Nobody on July 11, 2009, 02:13:33 AM
Yea I'd like to see those 1972 pics ;D

Clearly, either his genetics for fatloss are worse than Wavelenghts, his dieting practices worse than Wavelengths, or a combination of both, as their efforts and drug usage = similar at worst (most likely spermy uses drugs, while wave does not).

He claims to have superior dieting knowledge and fatloss genetics compared to Wavelengths, but surely he = wrong on one or both parts, and despite having been very outspoken about this before, he = not avoiding the issue. Why is that? The Swerdlow school of denial? :D
Logged

windsor88

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2580
  • Victim of the Drug War
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #9 on: July 11, 2009, 02:17:02 AM »
Quote from: Mr Nobody on July 11, 2009, 02:13:33 AM
Yea I'd like to see those 1972 pics ;D

Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2009, 02:18:03 AM »
Logged

windsor88

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2580
  • Victim of the Drug War
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2009, 02:18:44 AM »
Quote from: sevastase on July 11, 2009, 02:18:03 AM
thats 1994

Was you natural at that time?
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2009, 02:18:58 AM »
Quote from: sevastase on July 11, 2009, 02:18:03 AM
thats 1994

Why do you refuse to answer the question? Are you in denial about your inferior genetics and/or dieting knowledge compared to Wavelength? :D
Logged

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2009, 02:19:11 AM »
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #14 on: July 11, 2009, 02:20:53 AM »
Quote from: sevastase on July 11, 2009, 02:18:03 AM
thats 1994
Alright now we are having a posedown here anybody got pics of wavelength?
Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #15 on: July 11, 2009, 02:21:19 AM »
Quote from: Mars on July 11, 2009, 02:19:11 AM
thats not you
too much hair ? lol
Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2009, 02:22:06 AM »
Quote from: Mr Nobody on July 11, 2009, 02:20:53 AM
Alright now we are having a posedown here anybody got pics of wavelength?
here are 2 pics for a posedown
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2009, 02:31:17 AM »
Quote from: sevastase on July 11, 2009, 02:22:06 AM
here are 2 pics for a posedown
Is this you or wavelength?
Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #18 on: July 11, 2009, 02:32:19 AM »
Logged

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #19 on: July 11, 2009, 02:34:06 AM »
Quote from: sevastase on July 11, 2009, 02:32:19 AM
ME
Nice conditioning...now we need to see wavelength...
Logged

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength
« Reply #20 on: July 11, 2009, 02:37:07 AM »


ahahahahaha

debussey putting the fabricating, bullshitting gypsy in his place.

respect.
Logged
b

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength
« Reply #21 on: July 11, 2009, 02:39:44 AM »
This is entertaining I need some popcorn to sit back and watch the show ;D
Logged

The Master

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Question for Spermballtaste/Sevastase regarding Wavelength
« Reply #22 on: July 11, 2009, 02:41:24 AM »
He now claimed that he does not take Debussey nor Wavelength seriously and therefore refuses to answer.

Yet, he was attacking Wavelength directly and unprovoked in the Wavelength dieting thread + several other threads several times over many weeks. How could he be motivated to discuss with him there (even unprovoked), yet bail out claiming he does not take him seriously enough to even answer when himself is being questioned? This does not make any sense, and only further proves that Sevastase = being selective with his criteria and just tries to escape from answering the question.

Your behavior is pretty transparent SevaStase ;)
Logged

OneManGang

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1628
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #23 on: July 11, 2009, 02:44:16 AM »
Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Question for Spermballtaste regarding Wavelength
« Reply #24 on: July 11, 2009, 02:45:57 AM »
Quote from: Mr Nobody on July 11, 2009, 02:34:06 AM
Nice conditioning...now we need to see wavelength...
those are nowhere near contest condition and I was clean there

no contest pics

I'm sorry debussey but to me you're just a gimmick and cannot take you seriously

you are funny though
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5   Go Up
« previous next »