Good pictures, Bay.
A while back I recall reading an article in one of the national magazines regarding "Degrees of Gayness" or some similar title.
The author, a doctor of some sort who claimed to be an expert in the field, claimed that everyone, male and female, has a bit of "gayness" within them and then went on to categorize those 'degrees' on a very interesting percentile scale with no-one in the 'extremely gay' (one end of the scale) or 'extremely straight' (the other end of the scale) category.
Would it be possible to come to some sort of a common agreement if everyone was to agree with the above doctor and his "Degree of Gayness Scale"?
Would it be remotely possible to be a tiny, tiny, tiny, tiny bit gay (let's say 1 or 2% gay) if you were a bodybuilding fan, and ultra gay (maybe 98 - 99% gay), if you wanted to sleep with that entire Olympia lineup?
I do recall him stating that most guys and gals fit into the 20 to 30% bracket but I don't recall him disclosing his definition of those guys or gals who fit either the 100% or 1% categories, so I'll leave that up to you GetBiggers to decide.
One last comment .... he did also state that only those who were in lower 5% or the upper 5% were completely honest in their self appraisal, while the majority of the others were in complete denial.
Interesting study which I'll see if I can find on the net once again.
Another comment ... Bay, you write intelligently about interesting and controversial topics. I think that is the main reason people read and respond to your posts. And I would assume that most of those IM's you receive are somewhat opposite your personal 'beliefs' or simply a topic of personal, but not sexual, interest.
And JNN writes very interesting comments, but in most cases you have to read what he has to say more than once to fully understand - Definitely a humorous contributor with a decent degree of intelligence. He is one GetBigger who can say things without actually saying things.
And I have a feeling that JNN will be one of the first to place himself in the above category. I'd only have reason to question him if he was to place himself within the extremes of either category (meaning either end of the scale).
Thanks, Stunt
