Author Topic: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.  (Read 8283 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #50 on: October 18, 2010, 06:21:01 PM »
goodness why would ya do that..State sucks donkey doo doo

property taxes

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #51 on: October 18, 2010, 06:22:06 PM »
property taxes

seriously is it that big of difference

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #52 on: October 18, 2010, 06:22:48 PM »
seriously is it that big of difference

Yes. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #53 on: October 18, 2010, 06:26:33 PM »
Yes. 

Gotcha, good luck finding a house. I'm sure they have come down in prices as of late

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #54 on: October 18, 2010, 06:28:30 PM »
Gotcha, good luck finding a house. I'm sure they have come down in prices as of late

Not that much where I am looking.  A lot of these people think it is still 2005. 

I went in to one place yesterday and it was like stepping into 1978.  Wood paneling, cheesy wrought iron, etc. 

Plus it smelled like wet dog. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #55 on: October 18, 2010, 06:29:11 PM »
Not that much where I am looking.  A lot of these people think it is still 2005. 

I went in to one place yesterday and it was like stepping into 1978.  Wood paneling, cheesy wrought iron, etc. 

Plus it smelled like wet dog. 

LMAO, what are they asking for it? I know that part of the state is rinky donk in prices

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #56 on: October 18, 2010, 06:33:48 PM »
LMAO, what are they asking for it? I know that part of the state is rinky donk in prices

749k.  I told them I woould pay 500k since I had to change the windows, the floors, the dry wall, etc to get rid of the dog smell and everything else.  North stamford has tons of land, is right off the merrit, has a metro north station to NYC, and the taxes ar about 50% of what they would be in Westchester. 

They asked me to leave and not insult them.  I told them to call me 6 months from now when no one wants to buy it. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #57 on: October 18, 2010, 06:36:38 PM »
749k.  I told them I woould pay 500k since I had to change the windows, the floors, the dry wall, etc to get rid of the dog smell and everything else.  North stamford has tons of land, is right off the merrit, has a metro north station to NYC, and the taxes ar about 50% of what they would be in Westchester. 

They asked me to leave and not insult them.  I told them to call me 6 months from now when no one wants to buy it. 

HOLLY HELL. Damn couldn't they give you a buyers credit or something?? Their agent is not to good of a job if ya ask me, how long on the market has this house been on?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #58 on: October 18, 2010, 06:40:09 PM »
HOLLY HELL. Damn couldn't they give you a buyers credit or something?? Their agent is not to good of a job if ya ask me, how long on the market has this house been on?

6 weeks.  I am not rushing into anything.  If I dont get a steal, I'm not looking at it. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #59 on: October 19, 2010, 04:07:21 PM »
6 weeks.  I am not rushing into anything.  If I dont get a steal, I'm not looking at it. 

I bet there is a price reduction soon, not the one your looking for

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #60 on: November 02, 2010, 02:02:17 PM »
Connecticut: Blumenthal campaign worried their voters are not turning out
Wireupdate ^ | November 2, 2010 | By Joe Brooks



Low supporter turnout for Richard Blumenthal has forced the campaign to send out an alert Tuesday afternoon urging supporters to get out to the polls.

“Voter turnout appears to be heavy in areas that benefit our opponent,” The campaign email read".” It is critical that we maximize our efforts to get our supporters to the polls. We need your help”

Blumenthal is running against Linda McMahon in a highly publicized campaign for US Senate in Connecticut. The Real Clear Politics average of all national pulling has Blumenthal leading McMahon by 9 points, however that lead has been shrinking in recent weeks.

Polls close in Connecticut at 8PM ET.


BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #61 on: November 02, 2010, 02:12:49 PM »
I lived in Norwalk CT for 42 years.The prices in CT for everything drove us to Indiana.We bought a house in Indiana for 240,000 that would have cost 1 million in Norwalk.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #62 on: November 02, 2010, 04:46:10 PM »
I lived in Norwalk CT for 42 years.The prices in CT for everything drove us to Indiana.We bought a house in Indiana for 240,000 that would have cost 1 million in Norwalk.

!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #63 on: November 02, 2010, 06:22:38 PM »
blum sucks, in a major way.   That liar should have lost by a ton.

yet the repubs let a rich person buy the nomination.  Someone without the ability to win.  Just another Fiorinia or Whitman.  They let far better candidates fall to the wayside cause $ talks.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #64 on: November 02, 2010, 06:25:53 PM »
blum sucks, in a major way.   That liar should have lost by a ton.

yet the repubs let a rich person buy the nomination.  Someone without the ability to win.  Just another Fiorinia or Whitman.  They let far better candidates fall to the wayside cause $ talks.

::)

You really don't understand a single thing about Connecticut politics yet you continually regurgitate that same line. Give it a rest.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #65 on: November 02, 2010, 06:29:23 PM »
240 latches on to something he thinks sounds good and repeats it endlessly.  McMahon was a great candidate. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #66 on: November 02, 2010, 06:32:10 PM »
I understand they're a lib state - but the fact McMahon was tied with him in polls tells me there's a damn good chance a repub could beat a lying bum like Blum.

She was just a weak candidate.  but that's okay - cause now that the tea party movement is accepted, stronger candidates will move into that category for 2012.  You won't see an Angle or a ODonnell reach the nomination - people who can actually WIN over a far-left dem in a leftish state will run.  Coons should have lost.  Reid should have lost.  By miles.

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #67 on: November 02, 2010, 06:33:16 PM »
240 latches on to something he thinks sounds good and repeats it endlessly.  McMahon was a great candidate. 

why is that

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #68 on: November 02, 2010, 06:34:45 PM »
why is that

Self made business person with international business epxerience who knows about economics, business, jobs, and what it will take to get the economy in order.  Blumenthal is just a lying hack who will rubber stamp obama;s worst excesses. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #69 on: November 02, 2010, 06:35:28 PM »
Self made business person with international business epxerience who knows about economics, business, jobs, and what it will take to get the economy in order.  Blumenthal is just a lying hack who will rubber stamp obama;s worst excesses. 

gotcha, thanks for sharing 33386

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #70 on: November 02, 2010, 06:35:46 PM »
I understand they're a lib state - but the fact McMahon was tied with him in polls tells me there's a damn good chance a repub could beat a lying bum like Blum.

She was just a weak candidate.  but that's okay - cause now that the tea party movement is accepted, stronger candidates will move into that category for 2012.  You won't see an Angle or a ODonnell reach the nomination - people who can actually WIN over a far-left dem in a leftish state will run.  Coons should have lost.  Reid should have lost.  By miles.

I think it was impressive enough that she managed to pull even with him. Schiff may or may not have beaten him but his campaign strategy was horrible and he played himself right out of contention.

The media here did a great job silencing any talk about Blumenthal's lies. He's a horrible candidate but the majority of people here vote on party lines regardless of candidates so whatever.

Self made business person with international business epxerience who knows about economics, business, jobs, and what it will take to get the economy in order.  Blumenthal is just a lying hack who will rubber stamp obama;s worst excesses.  

Most people in the state don't even like Blumenthal but they'll be damned if they vote against the democrats. CT has long been one of their strongholds.

Looks like Himes may be going down, though. L-O-L!

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #71 on: November 02, 2010, 06:37:11 PM »

Most people in the state don't even like Blumenthal but they'll be damned if they vote against the democrats. CT has long been one of their strongholds.

BF, I wouldn't be so sure about that, some of the races I voted for republicans

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #72 on: November 02, 2010, 06:38:20 PM »
how can she pull even - and not win - and still do a good job?

I don't follow.  She lost momentum against a guy who lied about one of those things you just can't lie about and recover.  MSN spent 3 months trashing Blum - Chris mathews did it on a daily basis!!!

So you're saying she's a good candidate - who squanders a lead against a liar even MSNBC bashes?  I don't follow...

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #73 on: November 02, 2010, 06:39:36 PM »
how can she pull even - and not win - and still do a good job?

I don't follow.  She lost momentum against a guy who lied about one of those things you just can't lie about and recover.  MSN spent 3 months trashing Blum - Chris mathews did it on a daily basis!!!

So you're saying she's a good candidate - who squanders a lead against a liar even MSNBC bashes?  I don't follow...

It's Connecticut. No one cares about Blumenthal's lies. Believe me. I asked my parents about it and they couldn't have cared less. Same goes for the rest of the sheeple who vote along party lines in this state.

McMahon was never going to win. Or any Repub candidate. The question was how badly would they lose.

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19338
  • Getbig!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #74 on: November 02, 2010, 06:39:42 PM »
I understand they're a lib state - but the fact McMahon was tied with him in polls tells me there's a damn good chance a repub could beat a lying bum like Blum.

She was just a weak candidate.  but that's okay - cause now that the tea party movement is accepted, stronger candidates will move into that category for 2012.  You won't see an Angle or a ODonnell reach the nomination - people who can actually WIN over a far-left dem in a leftish state will run.  Coons should have lost.  Reid should have lost.  By miles.

Angle is still in her race. While I wish O'Donnell could have pulled it off, I'm glad she made it this far. It's numbskulls like Mike Castle that need to go. I just hope Murkowski gets crushed, just like Crist in Florida.