Author Topic: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.  (Read 8262 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #75 on: November 02, 2010, 06:40:32 PM »
how can she pull even - and not win - and still do a good job?

I don't follow.  She lost momentum against a guy who lied about one of those things you just can't lie about and recover.  MSN spent 3 months trashing Blum - Chris mathews did it on a daily basis!!!

So you're saying she's a good candidate - who squanders a lead against a liar even MSNBC bashes?  I don't follow...

240 - you are clueless.  BF and I live in far left states. 

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #76 on: November 02, 2010, 06:40:37 PM »
It's Connecticut. No one cares about Blumenthal's lies. Believe me. I asked my parents about it and they couldn't have cared less. Same goes for the rest of the sheeple who vote along party lines in this state.
Too bad the apple fell FAR from the tree.
!

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #77 on: November 02, 2010, 06:42:01 PM »
Too bad the apple fell FAR from the tree.

;D

Come on, man. Blumenthal's fucking terrible. You can lean left or be a democrat and still acknowledge that. The guy is a horrible candidate.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #78 on: November 02, 2010, 06:43:17 PM »
240 - you are clueless.  BF and I live in far left states.  

Why was McMahon polling TIED in a far left state?

If she lost by 17 points after training by 17 points (see: ODonnell)... I'd understand.

But she was TIED and managed to blow it.  It's hard to blame the state for being lib, when the voters liked her equally.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #79 on: November 02, 2010, 06:44:37 PM »
Why was McMahon polling TIED in a far left state?

If she lost by 17 points after training by 17 points (see: ODonnell)... I'd understand.

But she was TIED and managed to blow it.  It's hard to blame the state for being lib, when the voters liked her equally.

She needed to go above and beyond to win over voters here and she didn't. They came out even from the one debate they had and that just doesn't cut it.

I don't think Schiff would've done any better.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #80 on: November 02, 2010, 06:46:21 PM »
She needed to go above and beyond to win over voters here and she didn't. They came out even from the one debate they had and that just doesn't cut it.

I don't think Schiff would've done any better.

In states like NY & CT, the dems are almost always a lock regardless,  240 does not live in a state like this so he doesnt get it. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #81 on: November 02, 2010, 06:46:38 PM »
She needed to go above and beyond to win over voters here and she didn't. They came out even from the one debate they had and that just doesn't cut it.

I don't think Schiff would've done any better.

no he wouldn't have.
Can't wait to get Rell out of office. Stupid bitch

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #82 on: November 02, 2010, 06:47:12 PM »
no he wouldn't have.
Can't wait to get Rell out of office. Stupid bitch

I actually voted dem for governor.  :o

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #83 on: November 02, 2010, 06:48:01 PM »
I actually voted dem for governor.  :o

as a Dem (for the most part) welcome to the darkside kid..LMAO

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #84 on: November 02, 2010, 06:50:27 PM »
as a Dem (for the most part) welcome to the darkside kid..LMAO

Wasn't the first time I've voted dem.  :D

I just thought Blumenthal was an atrocious candidate. I bagged on Schiff but he makes Blumenthal look like an even bigger idiot than he is.


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #85 on: November 02, 2010, 06:51:01 PM »
She needed to go above and beyond to win over voters here and she didn't. They came out even from the one debate they had and that just doesn't cut it.

He was plummeting and she was rising steady - until oct 1, 2010.

Rassmussen had her within the margin of error - 3 points - it was a stat tie.

Then, it reversed.  He jumped 7 points in 4 weeks.  Why?

Not cause it's a lib state.  cause she lost momentum.  Maybe she ran a weak campaign, I dunno.  But she lost it that last month.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/ct/connecticut_senate_mcmahon_vs_blumenthal-1145.html#polls

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #86 on: November 02, 2010, 06:52:16 PM »
He was plummeting and she was rising steady - until oct 1, 2010.

Rassmussen had her within the margin of error - 3 points - it was a stat tie.

Then, it reversed.  He jumped 7 points in 4 weeks.  Why?

Not cause it's a lib state.  cause she lost momentum.  Maybe she ran a weak campaign, I dunno.  But she lost it that last month.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/ct/connecticut_senate_mcmahon_vs_blumenthal-1145.html#polls

I believe their debate was right around the 1st.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #87 on: November 02, 2010, 06:52:46 PM »
Again 240 - she would have won if it were almost any other state than CT

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #88 on: November 02, 2010, 06:53:58 PM »
Outside of Dodd/Blumenthal, CT dems aren't bad at all. Those two, on the other hand....

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #89 on: November 02, 2010, 06:55:43 PM »
Again 240 - she would have won if it were almost any other state than CT

If she had WON the debate handily - She'd have won the job.  hard to blame a state's tendencies when you need a challenger to 'knock out' the incumbent.

It was just her inability to 'wow' voters that cost her the job.  They were conservative enough to put her in a tie and give her a chance to win.  Once she got the national spotlight, and it wasn't a staged wrestling match or something she carefully controlled - she was exposed and voters saw thru it.

I'm saying, in 2012, a stronger candidate will emerge from the tea party in all races.  Losers like blum and reid and that bearded marxist coons will LOSE... if yall stop letting rich people and extremists win the nominations.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #90 on: November 02, 2010, 06:57:12 PM »
If she had WON the debate handily - She'd have won the job.  hard to blame a state's tendencies when you need a challenger to 'knock out' the incumbent.

It was just her inability to 'wow' voters that cost her the job.  They were conservative enough to put her in a tie and give her a chance to win.  Once she got the national spotlight, and it wasn't a staged wrestling match or something she carefully controlled - she was exposed and voters saw thru it.

I'm saying, in 2012, a stronger candidate will emerge from the tea party in all races.  Losers like blum and reid and that bearded marxist coons will LOSE... if yall stop letting rich people and extremists win the nominations.

The repubs no one viable outside of Schiff and he beat himself with his poor campaigning. What's sad is that the dems could have run someone worthwhile and instead they went with the same old terrible career politician.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #91 on: November 02, 2010, 07:10:55 PM »
;D

Come on, man. Blumenthal's fucking terrible. You can lean left or be a democrat and still acknowledge that. The guy is a horrible candidate.
;D

I don't know much about Blumenthal, actually. But McMahon? Thank God its a no-go for her. Blumenthal had a track record and experience that could be judged, his Vietnam lie notwithstanding.
!

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #92 on: November 02, 2010, 07:11:41 PM »
If she had WON the debate handily - She'd have won the job.  hard to blame a state's tendencies when you need a challenger to 'knock out' the incumbent.

It was just her inability to 'wow' voters that cost her the job.  They were conservative enough to put her in a tie and give her a chance to win.  Once she got the national spotlight, and it wasn't a staged wrestling match or something she carefully controlled - she was exposed and voters saw thru it.

I'm saying, in 2012, a stronger candidate will emerge from the tea party in all races.  Losers like blum and reid and that bearded marxist coons will LOSE... if yall stop letting rich people and extremists win the nominations.
I just can't your political posts seriously, bro.
!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #93 on: November 02, 2010, 07:12:39 PM »
I just can't your political posts seriously, bro.

The idiot wrote a paper calling himself a bearded marxist you dope. 

newmom

  • Guest
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #94 on: November 02, 2010, 07:13:07 PM »
;D

I don't know much about Blumenthal, actually. But McMahon? Thank God its a no-go for her. Blumenthal had a track record and experience that could be judged, his Vietnam lie notwithstanding.

excellent post

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19338
  • Getbig!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #95 on: November 02, 2010, 07:21:36 PM »
If she had WON the debate handily - She'd have won the job.  hard to blame a state's tendencies when you need a challenger to 'knock out' the incumbent.

It was just her inability to 'wow' voters that cost her the job.  They were conservative enough to put her in a tie and give her a chance to win.  Once she got the national spotlight, and it wasn't a staged wrestling match or something she carefully controlled - she was exposed and voters saw thru it.

I'm saying, in 2012, a stronger candidate will emerge from the tea party in all races.  Losers like blum and reid and that bearded marxist coons will LOSE... if yall stop letting rich people and extremists win the nominations.

It's because of those "extremists" that the GOP is winning tonight. The fact that conservatives can compete in blue state, and beat RINOs in the process, is a good sign.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #96 on: November 02, 2010, 07:45:43 PM »
It's because of those "extremists" that the GOP is winning tonight. The fact that conservatives can compete in blue state, and beat RINOs in the process, is a good sign.

palin is 2 for 5 so far... very cool she's doing so well.

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #97 on: November 02, 2010, 08:35:36 PM »
;D

I don't know much about Blumenthal, actually. But McMahon? Thank God its a no-go for her. Blumenthal had a track record and experience that could be judged, his Vietnam lie notwithstanding.




You don't know much about anything dumbass.




GOP will pick a few house and senate seats that you can feel good about, but not enough to stop Obama from pushing the agenda freight train going.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.


Now, go off yourself.





Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #98 on: November 02, 2010, 08:40:02 PM »



You don't know much about anything dumbass.




HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.


Now, go off yourself.





Not happening, fuckhole. Why? Because tomorrow this man will still occupy the White House.  ;)





Gotta love it when PEA BRAIN switches gimmicks.  ::)
!

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Linda McMahon closing in on Blumenthal in CT Senate race.
« Reply #99 on: November 02, 2010, 08:44:46 PM »
Not happening, fuckhole. Why? Because tomorrow this man will still occupy the White House.  ;)




Gotta love it when PEA BRAIN switches gimmicks.  ::)






YAWN.  Same tired old diatribe from another liberal moron.  Let's see him push his agenda now dipshit.