Is that good or bad?
I believe that RAW used to average 7-9 in the Nielsen's during the "Attitude Era."
But, you've got to factor in & compare it to what WWE programming usually draws these days, and that, I do not know.
My gripe with the Nielsen ratings is that it's only a representative sampling of audience/demographic.
The modems that track that info are only connected to TV's in a very small number of homes compared to the number of homes that actually have a TV.
Statistically, the sample audience is supposed to be an accurate/balanced representation of all viewers, but I question its reliability.
If you only use 25,000 trackers, but 99% of households
(about 115 million) have a television, that gives a sample comprising less than 0.1% of viewers.
I simply think that is too small of a sample size to evenly represent
ALL viewers.
JMO.