Liberalism Has Crushed Human Nature

[#1 Klaus fan]

"There’s nothing good about drug use. We know it. It destroys individuals. It destroys families. Drug use destroys societies. Drug use, some might say, is destroying this country. And we have laws against selling drugs, pushing drugs, using drugs, importing drugs. And the laws are good because we know what happens to people in societies and neighborhoods which become consumed by them. And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up,"

His words 

just another fucking hypocrite

The ever present over compensation right there.

[Soul Crusher]

 

[#1 Klaus fan]

What do you know about economics?

[_bruce_]

What do you know about economics?

According to armstrong the future is grim.

[Soul Crusher]

What do you know about economics?

Go look at my posts from around the time of the collapse and what I said would be the result of obamanomics compared to the result today and you tell me what I know.   Hint - almost every prediction I made came to fruition.   

[SF1900]

No, what has crushed human nature is extreme morons like Coach (sorry, coach, no offense). Those that cling so blindly to one side, that they they fail to see another persons view. Coach is so blinded by theism and the republican party that he can't see anything beyond that. So even if Coach did agree with a democratic or liberal view, he would toss it out of its mind because of the source. If Coach knew that idea was a good idea for mankind, he still would not accept it because it came from a democrat or liberal. This is no good.

I consider myself an independent. As long as the idea makes sense, I dont care where it came from. Coach does. That is the problem.

[Galvatron]

No, what has crushed human nature is extreme morons like Coach (sorry, coach, no offense). Those that cling so blindly to one side, that they they fail to see another persons view. Coach is so blinded by theism and the republican party that he can't see anything beyond that. So even if Coach did agree with a democratic or liberal view, he would toss it out of its mind because of the source. If Coach knew that idea was a good idea for mankind, he still would not accept it because it came from a democrat or liberal. This is no good.

I consider myself an independent. As long as the idea makes sense, I dont care where it came from. Coach does. That is the problem.

the thing is that to a large extent dems and reps are the same shit. pseudo democracy. there needs to be more diversity instead of this constant rep vs dem stand off.

[SF1900]

the thing is that to a large extent dems and reps are the same shit. pseudo democracy. there needs to be more diversity instead of this constant rep vs dem stand off.

There is this joke that at the end of the day democrats and republicans all sit together in one big room and sort of discuss how to gain more power, etc. I guess it just means, like you said, its all the same shit.

[#1 Klaus fan]

Go look at my posts from around the time of the collapse and what I said would be the result of obamanomics compared to the result today and you tell me what I know.   Hint - almost every prediction I made came to fruition.   

How many books on economics have you read?

[Soul Crusher]

How many books on economics have you read?

Tons

Hazlitt, Schiff, Sowell, Samuelson, Kotilkoff, Creature from Jeykll, Ron pauls' books, Murray Rothbard, to name a few.   

[#1 Klaus fan]

Tons

Hazlitt, Schiff, Sowell, Samuelson, Kotilkoff, Creature from Jeykll, Ron pauls' books, Murray Rothbard, to name a few.  

I'm impressed. I haven't read much, some basics of macro economics.

[Coach is Back!]

No, what has crushed human nature is extreme morons like Coach (sorry, coach, no offense). Those that cling so blindly to one side, that they they fail to see another persons view. Coach is so blinded by theism and the republican party that he can't see anything beyond that. So even if Coach did agree with a democratic or liberal view, he would toss it out of its mind because of the source. If Coach knew that idea was a good idea for mankind, he still would not accept it because it came from a democrat or liberal. This is no good.

I consider myself an independent. As long as the idea makes sense, I dont care where it came from. Coach does. That is the problem.

Look, you don't have to be an econ major to figure out what works and what doesn't work. What Obama and this administration is trying to push on us doesn't work and never has. He's trying to make this country in to a euro economy and even though he sees the (I know he see's the downfall, no one is that fucking stupid) European markets and economy totally collapsing he still wants us to be like them. I don't have to listen to any right wing talk show host to figure this out. I have a business, I have investments, I have a retirement, etc and I see what its doing. You can't possibly think all of this spending isn't going to come back and bite all of us in this ass, it would be illogical to think other wise.

You think I'm the only one? You have billionairs who supported obama saying the same thing. Don't single me out dude. I'm not the only one!

[Fury]

Its certainly crushed the EU.

[Nirvana]

extremism is the problem.

on the right, its the people saying govt should be stripped down, with the only regulation being spending an asslod on defense and of course, enforcing anti-abotion and anti-gay laws.  You know, kill social security and medicare and it's everyone on their own, cause that'll end well.

on the left, it's the lazy entitled kids that think they deserve a job making $70k a year for 40 hours desk work, because after all, they have a bachelors degree in communication or 17th century british arts.  They like their welfare, their handouts, they love the govt controlling everything.


Both sides are completely, and hopelessly, fcked in their heads.

The solution lies in between, of course, which is why we keep seeing leaders of extremes get elected to kinda pull that pendulum back and forth.  The left took over in 2008, winning everything.  Then the right took over in 2010, with the great tea party success.  Now we'll see the 2011 shifting momentum, and 2012 will probably be Obama keeping his jobs and congress remaining close. 

x9872364574392786349756487369287364987564893762987346957846389729837469574398273984765473298374659283764982734657643629785649286389768726581726358476258716257836518726586758716586538762947697364978345yu34kyu3g4iuy23t42763492734629374865938746529387465938746592786397659287364928376492538746547832983746958746392876394857693872693874659873629837492837469278346ri273yt45982734rtyi567r23t4ir267t3i467er234ir234675ri457ryi234567rt2i57263i472634i7ry2t3i7t623i457623i47r623i47623i47ry23io4782y63io57823y4or78235yo378532h3hd2375rtyo2375

[Reeves]

How many books on economics have you read?

A better question would be - "How many have you written?"

That would go for everyone concerned.  Me?  I have not written a single book on that subject.  Nope.  Not a one. 

[SF1900]

Look, you don't have to be an econ major to figure out what works and what doesn't work. What Obama and this administration is trying to push on us doesn't work and never has. He's trying to make this country in to a euro economy and even though he sees the (I know he see's the downfall, no one is that fucking stupid) European markets and economy totally collapsing he still wants us to be like them. I don't have to listen to any right wing talk show host to figure this out. I have a business, I have investments, I have a retirement, etc and I see what its doing. You can't possibly think all of this spending isn't going to come back and bite all of us in this ass, it would be illogical to think other wise.

You think I'm the only one? You have billionairs who supported obama saying the same thing. Don't single me out dude. I'm not the only one!

That is not the issue, Coach.

What I am saying is that even if you did agree with a democratic or liberal on a point of view, you would dismiss it because of we're it's coming from. That is called extremism and that is the source of the problem.

[Coach is Back!]

That is not the issue, Coach.

What I am saying is that even if you did agree with a democratic or liberal on a point of view, you would dismiss it because of we're it's coming from. That is called extremism and that is the source of the problem.

Thats really not true. It just depends on what source and who it's coming from. I'm more open minded than you think I am.

[Reeves]

That is not the issue, Coach.

What I am saying is that even if you did agree with a democratic or liberal on a point of view, you would dismiss it because of we're it's coming from. That is called extremism and that is the source of the problem.

You must first provide an example the would meet the subjects needs from a variety of angles including but not limited to moral, ethical, and economic concerns, etc.  A blanket statement merely smothers the truth in an agenda to make a point. 

Just saying.   

[Coach is Back!]

You must first provide an example the would meet the subjects needs from a variety of angles including but not limited to moral, ethical, and economic concerns, etc.  A blanket statement merely smothers the truth in an agenda to make a point. 

Just saying.   

I swear reeves I'm going to answer your pm

[Radical Plato]

Liberalism = Feminism = Crushing of Human Nature = Constant Ball Busting = working way too hard to get your fair share of entitled pussy

[SF1900]

You must first provide an example the would meet the subjects needs from a variety of angles including but not limited to moral, ethical, and economic concerns, etc.  A blanket statement merely smothers the truth in an agenda to make a point. 

Just saying.   

I agree! Even if it did for Coach, he still would not agree with it if it came from a liberal.  Coach doesn't care what's good for humanity, only what is good for himself, religious nutjobs and conservatives.

[Reeves]

I swear reeves I'm going to answer your pm

Thanks.  As you can see, I'm not getting any better as evidenced by sometimes using the wrong words and I have difficulty spelling and staying on track/focused, albeit when a topic is a passion of mine I can focus harder.  Thank "Science" for spell check.  

And thank you, sir.

[Reeves]

I agree! Even if it did for Coach, he still would not agree with it if it came from a liberal.   Coach doesn't care what's good for humanity, only what is good for himself, religious nutjobs and conservatives.

    Okay, but remember I am very conservative. I make Rush look like a total lib.    

But back to the topic at hand.  I think Coach would agree on some "compromises" given as I said the parameters of the proposal met his definitions within good reason.  For example I have heard off the wall liberals spout crap like "conservatives don't want clean air and clean water!".  That's pure bullshit but few if any media folk call them on this drivel.  

It is a blanket statement meant solely to expand their agenda by smothering the truth on their adversaries.  Of course conservatives desire clean air and water. Who would not?  FTN.

Both sides are capable of doing so but more often than not it seems to be the liberal side of the equation.   Thanks again.

[SF1900]

    Okay, but remember I am very conservative. I make Rush look like a total lib.    

But back to the topic at hand.  I think Coach would agree on some "compromises" given as I said the parameters of the proposal met his definitions within good reason.  For example I have heard off the wall liberals spout crap like "conservatives don't want clean air and clean water!".  That's pure bullshit but few if any media folk call them on this drivel.  

It is a blanket statement meant solely to expand their agenda by smothering the truth on their adversaries.  Of course conservatives desire clean air and water. Who would not?  FTN.

Both sides are capable of doing so but more often than not it seems to be the liberal side of the equation.   Thanks again.

"Within good reason" and theism don't go hand-in-hand. You can't think anything with good reason when you think the universe is only 6,000 years old. 

[Coach is Back!]

    Okay, but remember I am very conservative. I make Rush look like a total lib.    

But back to the topic at hand.  I think Coach would agree on some "compromises" given as I said the parameters of the proposal met his definitions within good reason.  For example I have heard off the wall liberals spout crap like "conservatives don't want clean air and clean water!".  That's pure bullshit but few if any media folk call them on this drivel.  

It is a blanket statement meant solely to expand their agenda by smothering the truth on their adversaries.  Of course conservatives desire clean air and water. Who would not?  FTN.

Both sides are capable of doing so but more often than not it seems to be the liberal side of the equation.   Thanks again.

That's a good example. I live on the beach and when I look out my backyard I hate to see trash on the sand and ocean and trash being washed up on shore. Nothing pisses me off more. It's the extreme enviros that piss me off to no end telling us we can't drill in such and such place because of some fish or bird. In central california water was shut off to farmers and over 50,000 jobs were lost over some fucking fish. What kind of commonsense is that? You have people who are struggling to feed families because useless shit like this. Thats just ONE example.