So to be clear with your double standard...
She was sued by ONE person and lost, so she's guilty.
Cain was sued by TWO women (and the company paid them to shut up before they could lose), and he's innocent.
That's totally freakin' awesome!
Missed by a country mile, 240.
One, Cain was NEVER SUED for jack. He was ACCUSED of harassment. An investigation was done; Cain was cleared. and the women got severance deals. In fact, Cain wasn't even a part of those deals, as I've shown multiple times.
You see, in order to sue someone, you actually have to go to court. Of course, you don't bother asking why these women got a measley $81,000, in an era when women were cleaning up (averaging $300,000 in sexual harassment cases, winning two-thirds of the time).
Could it be that those women would have LOST in court and been up to their eyeballs in legal fees (i.e., a certain blonde who claimed Cain grabbed her goodies and nearly forced her to blow him to get her job back, yet hugged and schmoozed with this same guy nearly a decade and half later)?
Two, as I've said, I give Cain the benefit of the doubt, until HARD evidence says otherwise.
Flimsy claims from White, notorious for LIBEL AND STALKING, don't count as hard evidence.
YOU, on the other hand, bleated and wailed, about Cain lying to you. But, you have no problem with Gringrich's lying.
YOU have blasted Cain for alleged adultery (with, thus far, little-to-no proof); but you have no issue with Gingrich's ACTUAL adultery.
So the double-standard flap is on YOU.
