Author Topic: insane pic of coleman 2003  (Read 20066 times)

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41318
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2011, 02:24:18 PM »
Hey, Wiggs, how's it going? :)

Sup man what's new?  I still need to post some cycles from Ruhls book. I'll do it today.
7

Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #26 on: December 02, 2011, 02:24:37 PM »
Hey DavoodDave

Kun midi?

Swlabr

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #27 on: December 02, 2011, 02:25:19 PM »
Sup man what's new?  I still need to post some cycles from Ruhls book. I'll do it today.

Just doin' laundry my man. How's life treatin' ya?

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41318
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #28 on: December 02, 2011, 02:26:23 PM »
It was close, just maybe not as close as 98 or 2001. Jay was also huge and cut, but everyone kept talking about Ronnie because of all the size he'd put on. His butt must've weighed close to 30 lb, lol.

He was 10 lb heavier in 2004, but Jay was wider and beat him in the RLS pose that he called for in the tiebreaker of the challenge round that year, although the judges gave him the nod, which made him win that Olympia.

And Wiggs is talking about pics from this guestposing, right Wiggs?



That is correct Kiwi. It was a side chest pose and if my memory serves correct that thong is a vibrant light green....(that would be so gay if I remembered that correctly :-X)
7

Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #29 on: December 02, 2011, 02:27:24 PM »
That is correct Kiwi. It was a side chest pose and if my memory serves correct that thong is a vibrant light green....(that would be so gay if I remembered that correctly :-X)

Hahahaha


the trainer

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #30 on: December 02, 2011, 02:27:39 PM »
he honestly doesnt look AS dominant there as legend would have you believe, if you listened to all the hype about the "2003 Ronnie" youd think he was twice Jay's size.

please tell me you are joking and not serious, because if you are i would say get your eyes tested as soon as possible that year ronnie wiped the floor with jay.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83605
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #31 on: December 02, 2011, 02:27:50 PM »
Wasn't Ron 296 the next year ?

Yup and soft as fuck

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41318
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #32 on: December 02, 2011, 02:28:08 PM »
Just doin' laundry my man. How's life treatin' ya?

I'm finding out that any decent broads won't date you unless you have a job...So I started looking for a job... ;D
7

Schmoff

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #33 on: December 02, 2011, 02:29:14 PM »


wtf


Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41318
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #34 on: December 02, 2011, 02:29:30 PM »
7

Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #35 on: December 02, 2011, 02:31:24 PM »
red x

I forgot Ron bans pics from Matt Cs site

doriancutlerman

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1397
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #36 on: December 02, 2011, 02:32:07 PM »
Wasn't Ron 296 the next year ?

Yeah, and he looked like shit.  I watched the PPV and thought, "What the fuck happened to him?"  At the press conference, he said, "Hay dehre, aaym tree-hundret pounts dtoo!," took off his top and made Gunter and Jay look like a couple of jerk-off kids.  But the next day, he was watery as all get out.

He did harden up and actually gained weight on the Euro tour, but Ron and pretty much every top guy is best in the 250-260 range.  270, if you're tall.  Jay, him, Dorian, Nasser, Dillet, Haney -- it holds true across the board.


Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #37 on: December 02, 2011, 02:32:39 PM »
Yup and soft as fuck

Massive unsymmetrical lats that is never talked about

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41318
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #38 on: December 02, 2011, 02:33:29 PM »
I forgot Ron bans pics from Matt Cs site

Awwww shit....You can barely see the thong...How do I remember the color so clearly?   :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X
I need help...this is not good....really.

And yes, that was Dave's favorite Ronnie pic to post.
7

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #39 on: December 02, 2011, 02:34:20 PM »
That is correct Kiwi. It was a side chest pose and if my memory serves correct that thong is a vibrant light green....(that would be so gay if I remembered that correctly :-X)

That's right. I don't have that pic saved, maybe ND has it.

Edit: Nevermind, Coochrash came through.

Xerxes

  • Guest
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #40 on: December 02, 2011, 02:38:30 PM »
Awwww shit....You can barely see the thong...How do I remember the color so clearly?   :-X :-X :-X :-X :-X
I need help...this is not good....really.

And yes, that was Dave's favorite Ronnie pic to post.

Hence my laughter  ;D ;D

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #41 on: December 02, 2011, 03:38:24 PM »
That's right. I don't have that pic saved, maybe ND has it.

Edit: Nevermind, Coochrash came through.


Haha

NYSTATEOFMIND

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2156
  • Getbigs Reporter of perverse news
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #42 on: December 02, 2011, 03:41:36 PM »
he honestly doesnt look AS dominant there as legend would have you believe, if you listened to all the hype about the "2003 Ronnie" youd think he was twice Jay's size.

noone is gonna be twice Jays size but he clearly wins in that shot
getbig or getgot

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #43 on: December 02, 2011, 03:54:12 PM »
Calm down cable guy.

Easy there baldie  ;)

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #44 on: December 02, 2011, 04:03:30 PM »
 its not that ronnie was overrated, its that jay was underrated.   probably because of a lack of vascularity and striations on his upper body, as well as lacking lower back detail+some loose skin in the area. and having to stand next to ronnie coleman didnt help either.


Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #45 on: December 02, 2011, 04:37:26 PM »
I'm not fat anymore grandpa and this fucker must prove he's Dave. This is like Dave with his nuts cut off. Though the half-persian warrior and I rarely got along, it's not cool to hack an legends account and pretend to be him...He at least deserves that respect.

Shouldn't you be somewhere renting out your huge chin as a speed bag or a prosthetic nutsack? :D

I think he's just chill...but it's him.

and LOL at the chin remark  ;D

aesthetics

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2765
  • ~lil' cutey~
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #46 on: December 02, 2011, 07:56:55 PM »
ronnie used to go heavy as hell and he never had any major tears or injuries did he? compared to dorian who damn near tore every muscle in his body.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #47 on: December 02, 2011, 08:17:52 PM »

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #48 on: December 02, 2011, 08:31:49 PM »
That's one pic

He made everyone look small that year
Watch bfto03 
That's all
choice is an illusion

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: insane pic of coleman 2003
« Reply #49 on: December 02, 2011, 08:34:34 PM »
That's one pic

He made everyone look small that year
Watch bfto03 
That's all
i agree that he was better than everyone that year, my point was that based on that pic and also the other ones in this thread is that he wasnt AS dominant as legend makes it sound.