OBAMA'S ASS-KICKING OF 3333 CONTINUES...Gov't jobs shrunk 2.6% under Prez

[andreisdaman]

People always claim that Obama has increased the size of government..here goes another myth  off the table....government jobs has actually SHRUNK under Obama....2.6%.....as a matter of fact, Only Obama and RONALD REAGAN have accomplished such a steep drop in government jobs.....

Obama blowing 3333 out of the water again....government job cuts concerning teachers have been greater than Reagan under Obama, down 3%,,,which is more than Reagan....

Obama has proven that he has been anything BUT a Big Government Liberal

3333's ass must be so goddamn sore by now with all the ass-kickings by Obama

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/under-obama-a-record-decline-in-government-jobs/

[howardroark]

Government spending and deficits have exploded. So what you're saying is that Obummer has been providing less jobs at a higher cost?

[andreisdaman]

Government spending and deficits have exploded. So what you're saying is that Obummer has been providing less jobs at a higher cost?

Keep trying.....

[GigantorX]

People always claim that Obama has increased the size of government..here goes another myth  off the table....government jobs has actually SHRUNK under Obama....2.6%.....as a matter of fact, Only Obama and RONALD REAGAN have accomplished such a steep drop in government jobs.....

Obama blowing 3333 out of the water again....government job cuts concerning teachers have been greater than Reagan under Obama, down 3%,,,which is more than Reagan....

Obama has proven that he has been anything BUT a Big Government Liberal

3333's ass must be so goddamn sore by now with all the ass-kickings by Obama

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/under-obama-a-record-decline-in-government-jobs/

No, he is a big govt. liberal. "Big Government" goes far, far beyond simple things such as the number of employee's. It stretches to laws, taxes, war, social aims etc.

And yes, I applaud this "shrinking", but hey, the U.S. has yet again breached its debt ceiling limit and has surpassed 100% GDP to debt ratio!

[andreisdaman]

No, he is a big govt. liberal. "Big Government" goes far, far beyond simple things such as the number of employee's. It stretches to laws, taxes, war, social aims etc.

And yes, I applaud this "shrinking", but hey, the U.S. has yet again breached its debt ceiling limit and has surpassed 100% GDP to debt ratio!

I will be back on later to argue your point.....Good retort though

[howardroark]

I'm gonna continue quoting this until you explain how record levels of government spending, deficits, and debt while employing less people somehow qualifies as shrinking government:

Government spending and deficits have exploded. So what you're saying is that Obummer has been providing less jobs at a higher cost?

[Soul Crusher]

People always claim that Obama has increased the size of government..here goes another myth  off the table....government jobs has actually SHRUNK under Obama....2.6%.....as a matter of fact, Only Obama and RONALD REAGAN have accomplished such a steep drop in government jobs.....

Obama blowing 3333 out of the water again....government job cuts concerning teachers have been greater than Reagan under Obama, down 3%,,,which is more than Reagan....

Obama has proven that he has been anything BUT a Big Government Liberal

3333's ass must be so goddamn sore by now with all the ass-kickings by Obama

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/06/under-obama-a-record-decline-in-government-jobs/

You really are an idiot.     Did you even read the link - these are state govt jobs not fedzilla jobs. 


States have a mandate to balance the books unlike that thief thugbama. 

[tonymctones]

LMFAO

From your own link andre...

"This concept of foreseeability in tort law tends to limit liability to the consequences of an act that could reasonably be foreseen rather than every single consequence that follows."

"The declines in government jobs in both the Reagan and Obama presidencies coincided with major recessions, of course, which reduced tax receipts for all levels of government. If Mr. Obama had had his way, state and local government job losses in 2011 could have been reduced with more federal assistance, but such proposals were blocked by Republicans in Congress. There is no reason to think Mr. Obama is as happy about the reduction in government workers as some Republicans."


HAHHAHAh so basically your link says obama would have continued to increase big govt but the reps in congress kept him from doing it...

epic backfire.

[andreisdaman]

LMFAO

From your own link andre...

"This concept of foreseeability in tort law tends to limit liability to the consequences of an act that could reasonably be foreseen rather than every single consequence that follows."

"The declines in government jobs in both the Reagan and Obama presidencies coincided with major recessions, of course, which reduced tax receipts for all levels of government. If Mr. Obama had had his way, state and local government job losses in 2011 could have been reduced with more federal assistance, but such proposals were blocked by Republicans in Congress. There is no reason to think Mr. Obama is as happy about the reduction in government workers as some Republicans."


HAHHAHAh so basically your link says obama would have continued to increase big govt but the reps in congress kept him from doing it...

epic backfire.

no backfire at all.....thats the writer's OWN OPINION......he's not a mind -reader...he is making a guess that because Obama is a liberal he would want MORE gov't jobs....not necessarily the case smart guy

[tonymctones]

was it his opinion that the majority of the decrease was due to a decrease at the state level and had nothing to do with obama?

LMFAO

[andreisdaman]

was it his opinion that the majority of the decrease was due to a decrease at the state level and had nothing to do with obama?

LMFAO

Obama is the president and STILL gets the credit..you don't realize that yet smart guy???

[Shockwave]

Obama is the president and STILL gets the credit..you don't realize that yet smart guy???

So youre agreeing your giving him credit by proxy - and that if he had his way, it wouldnt have happened, but since he couldnt have his way, he still gets the credit?!
What kind of ass-backwards logic is that? Jesus Obama supporters are some of the most blind hard headed people Ive ever had the displeasure of dealing with =/

[andreisdaman]

So youre agreeing your giving him credit by proxy - and that if he had his way, it wouldnt have happened, but since he couldnt have his way, he still gets the credit?!
What kind of ass-backwards logic is that? Jesus Obama supporters are some of the most blind hard headed people Ive ever had the displeasure of dealing with =/

you mean the same backwards-ass logic that allows the Republicans to claim to be fiscal conservatives while borrowing massive amounts of money during the years that both Bushes were in office and running up huge deficits?.....the same backwards-ass logic that allows Republicans to claim to be the paragon of family values while constantly being caught up in affairs with other women (Schwartzenegger, Gingrich, Cain, Larry Craig, Senator John Ensign, Gov. Mark Sanford)?

why not???

[whork]

Stop wasting your time defending our politicians people. They all suck

[Shockwave]

you mean the same backwards-ass logic that allows the Republicans to claim to be fiscal conservatives while borrowing massive amounts of money during the years that both Bushes were in office and running up huge deficits?.....the same backwards-ass logic that allows Republicans to claim to be the paragon of family values while constantly being caught up in affairs with other women (Schwartzenegger, Gingrich, Cain, Larry Craig, Senator John Ensign, Gov. Mark Sanford)?

why not???

A.I dont give a fuck who politicians sleep with. None of my concern.
B.Bush's spending was inexcusable, as is Obamas. You cant justify one by using another as an excuse. Youre argument is fucking fail. Theyre all a bunch of shit. Obama's actions arent ok because Bush's were bad too. 

[andreisdaman]

A.I dont give a fuck who politicians sleep with. None of my concern.
B.Bush's spending was inexcusable, as is Obamas. You cant justify one by using another as an excuse. Youre argument is fucking fail. Theyre all a bunch of shit. Obama's actions arent ok because Bush's were bad too. 

I don't give a shit who they sleep with either....but when they publicly proclaim "family values" and then get caught with their dick out, thats HYPOCRISY..plain and simple..

but you don't care because they are your guys, right???

[Soul Crusher]

 . Andre seek help now.   

[tonymctones]

I don't give a shit who they sleep with either....but when they publicly proclaim "family values" and then get caught with their dick out, thats HYPOCRISY..plain and simple..

but you don't care because they are your guys, right???

but when they publicly proclaim we need to stop spending and then spend more than any president in the history of the US your ok with that?

when they say we need to get ppl back to work and then do things that stops ppl from hiring, you agree with that?

LMFAO

[Shockwave]

I don't give a shit who they sleep with either....but when they publicly proclaim "family values" and then get caught with their dick out, thats HYPOCRISY..plain and simple..

but you don't care because they are your guys, right???

You forgot to add Clinton to you list.
But he's your guy right?
Gengrich is not my guy.
All politicians are hypocrites, they have to have an image for people, their personal lives and what they choose to do are none of my concern (unless it directly impacts the governmentl, their office, or the country).
Im not the dumbass trying to use stupid attacks like who they choose to sleep with as a basis for voting.
Who they sleep with has nothing to do with their stances on the issues or how they voted in office, so its a non-issue. Only fucking retards would see that as something that matters in a candidate. Jesus.

Issues? How they voted? Their record in office? No, fuck it, I care about who they fuck.  (<--- thats what you sound like.)
Not to mention, just because they choose to do something in their personal lives, does not mean that it is indicative of what the country of a whole feels like, and that is peoples perogative LIVING in america, they have the freedom to make choices on how they live their lives.
It be like you saying, look, I choose to drink myself stupid every night, however it has consequences that are not always good, so I wouldnt recommend it to people in general.

Yes, Newt is a piece of shit, but thats not the point. Youre trying to justify Obama's behavior by saying that Newt is a piece of crap. Thats retarded. And it makes you look like a total tool.

[andreisdaman]

You forgot to add Clinton to you list.
But he's your guy right?
Gengrich is not my guy.
All politicians are hypocrites, they have to have an image for people, their personal lives and what they choose to do are none of my concern (unless it directly impacts the governmentl, their office, or the country).
Im not the dumbass trying to use stupid attacks like who they choose to sleep with as a basis for voting.
Who they sleep with has nothing to do with their stances on the issues or how they voted in office, so its a non-issue. Only fucking retards would see that as something that matters in a candidate. Jesus.

Issues? How they voted? Their record in office? No, fuck it, I care about who they fuck.  (<--- thats what you sound like.)
Not to mention, just because they choose to do something in their personal lives, does not mean that it is indicative of what the country of a whole feels like, and that is peoples perogative LIVING in america, they have the freedom to make choices on how they live their lives.
It be like you saying, look, I choose to drink myself stupid every night, however it has consequences that are not always good, so I wouldnt recommend it to people in general.

Yes, Newt is a piece of shit, but thats not the point. Youre trying to justify Obama's behavior by saying that Newt is a piece of crap. Thats retarded. And it makes you look like a total tool.

first of all, your argument about Clinton is bogus because he was never a family values guy....he had too much personal baggage to to talk about that.....and most Democrats don't preach that you must live your life a certain way like the Republicans do...thats the difference....and it does matter to a certain extent because you can't proclaim "family values" while sleeping around on your wife....sorry...it does matter....

comparing Obama to Newt is no-contest.....Obama wins hands-down....if you want to disagree with Obama's policies..okay....but people are blaming him for everything.....

Jimmy Carter said on CNN last week that one of the big secrets that people don't know about the presidency is that the president has absolutely no control over the economy....when I give Obama credit it is to counter-act the idiots on here who blame Obama if they stub their toe

[Shockwave]

first of all, your argument about Clinton is bogus because he was never a family values guy....he had too much personal baggage to to talk about that.....and most Democrats don't preach that you must live your life a certain way like the Republicans do...thats the difference....and it does matter to a certain extent because you can't proclaim "family values" while sleeping around on your wife....sorry...it does matter....

comparing Obama to Newt is no-contest.....Obama wins hands-down....if you want to disagree with Obama's policies..okay....but people are blaming him for everything.....

Jimmy Carter said on CNN last week that one of the big secrets that people don't know about the presidency is that the president has absolutely no control over the economy....when I give Obama credit it is to counter-act the idiots on here who blame Obama if they stub their toe

So youre saying that you have no point whatsoever. Good to know.
BTW, Obama is a failure. Utterly.

[andreisdaman]

So youre saying that you have no point whatsoever. Good to know.
BTW, Obama is a failure. Utterly.

sorry you're not able to understand.....I made my point well..you have shown yourself to be biased and incapable of independent, logical, critical thinking...

move on to the sex board....thats the only thing you can understand

[Shockwave]

sorry you're not able to understand.....I made my point well..you have shown yourself to be biased and incapable of independent, logical, critical thinking...

move on to the sex board....thats the only thing you can understand

No you didnt! Your whole argument was that Obama gets credit even when he's against something, and that whatever Obama does is OK as long as some republican did it to.
Oh, and that Newt is better than Obama because he preaches family values but doesnt practice them himself.

Im glad youre around to deliver these staggeringly intelligent points, I mean, I was just worried about the issues, the economy, and what Obama has done/passed in office.

I mean, how utterly stupid of me, clearly Obama should be praised for things that work out even when he opposes it, he should not get the criticism when he does something terribly fucked up as long as a republican has done something similar in the past, and I should be judging the candidates based on weather or not they practice the same lifestyle choices that they feel are the best choice for the majority of people.
Gotcha. Check. Yup.
















Jesus fucking Christ. Maybe youre the one that should move on to the sex board, cause you clearly cant even comprehend the meaning of what you write   
And god help you if you really think those points are worth more than the last pile of shit you left in your toilet 

[andreisdaman]

No you didnt! Your whole argument was that Obama gets credit even when he's against something, and that whatever Obama does is OK as long as some republican did it to.
Oh, and that Newt is better than Obama because he preaches family values but doesnt practice them himself.

Im glad youre around to deliver these staggeringly intelligent points, I mean, I was just worried about the issues, the economy, and what Obama has done/passed in office.

I mean, how utterly stupid of me, clearly Obama should be praised for things that work out even when he opposes it, he should not get the criticism when he does something terribly fucked up as long as a republican has done something similar in the past, and I should be judging the candidates based on weather or not they practice the same lifestyle choices that they feel are the best choice for the majority of people.
Gotcha. Check. Yup.
















Jesus fucking Christ. Maybe youre the one that should move on to the sex board, cause you clearly cant even comprehend the meaning of what you write   
And god help you if you really think those points are worth more than the last pile of shit you left in your toilet 

Dude...who said that Obama was against lowering gov't employment?..that was the writer's suggestion, not necessarily the truth......we don't know where he stands on the issue...but Repubs are always saying he is big government and always criticizing the number of Gov't jobs...just wanted to show that the actual amount of gov't jobs has decreased since Obama has been in office..thats all