Yes it appears to be from some test that he created himself and which is not accredited by any other society I've ever heard of.
His test is not accepted for very good reasons. Psychometric IQ tests have to be constructed according to established psychometrical principles with regard to item selection, validation, norm construction and reliability testing. The process should be documented in a peer-review publications in an international journal that is indexed in the major scientific databases, such as pubmed/medline, ISI Web of science or Psychinfo/psychlit. This is essential as it is in this fashion scientific standards are ensured.
The most widely used comprehensive IQ-test is WAIS, now at revision 4. IMO it is the best there is, as it measures IQ as a composite score from a diversity of cognitive domains.
Melao has not done this. He stated explicitely that his "theories" and his test is superior to other IQ tests, yet refuses to publish anything in a peer review journal, based on an intention to earn money from test-takers and book-copyrights.
To me, that is not an example of intelligent behavior, it is an example of narcissistic arrogance- claiming superiority but avoiding scrutiny from peers (superiors in his case, as he has no formal education)
NN