Author Topic: Obama has been a successful POTUS  (Read 16351 times)

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #250 on: July 16, 2012, 08:34:37 AM »

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #251 on: July 16, 2012, 04:56:55 PM »
You are pathetic

the IQ on some of these so-called conservatives is amazing :-X

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #252 on: July 16, 2012, 07:14:52 PM »
Who helped to fund obama while at harvard?   Any of you fucktard obamabots know?  Any of you even care? 




Calm down tinytits.   Why is it a mark of a low iq to mention that barack hussein obama performed felatio on larry sinclair in the back of a limo and he also was an admitted cocaine user and marijuana smoker.
Fellatio?..never heard that one

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #253 on: July 16, 2012, 07:16:05 PM »

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #254 on: July 16, 2012, 07:18:19 PM »

Bump for andre. 


maybe you and d ware should get together you seem to have the same interest  :D :D :D

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #255 on: July 17, 2012, 03:00:09 AM »
the IQ on some of these so-called conservatives is amazing :-X

Yup they support a free market every man for himself and yet they are the biggest losers. I bet he lives in a trailor park and smoke meth that would explain his childish posts

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #256 on: July 17, 2012, 03:56:24 AM »
Meh

Read this and get angry.
barack hussein obama let larry sinclair suck his dick while the kenyan loser smoked crack.
Trash pile.
Did you graduate from high school?

G

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #257 on: July 17, 2012, 04:07:15 AM »
Did you graduate from high school?



Do you know this closet homo?


garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #258 on: July 17, 2012, 05:20:19 AM »
WOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSHHH HHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
G

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #259 on: July 17, 2012, 05:31:07 AM »
WOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lulz.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #260 on: July 17, 2012, 05:48:24 AM »



Thread over. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #261 on: July 27, 2012, 04:26:51 PM »
GM Ramps Up Risky Subprime Auto Loans To Drive Sales


By DAVID HOGBERG, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Posted 06:07 PM ET






 View Enlarged Image

President Obama has touted General Motors (GM) as a successful example of his administration's policies. Yet GM's recovery is built, at least in part, on the increasing use of subprime loans.
 
The Obama administration in 2009 bailed out GM to the tune of $50 billion as it went into a managed bankruptcy.
 
Near the end of 2010, GM acquired a new captive lending arm, subprime specialist AmeriCredit. Renamed GM Financial, it has played a significant role in GM's growth .
 
The automaker is relying increasingly on subprime loans, 10-Q financial reports shows.
 
Potential borrowers of car loans are rated on FICO scores that range from 300 to 850. Anything under 660 is generally deemed subprime.
 
Subprime Key Driver
 
GM Financial auto loans to customers with FICO scores below 660 rose from 87% of total loans in Q4 2010 to 93% in Q1 2012.
 
The worse the FICO score, the bigger the increase. From Q4 2010 to Q1 2012, GM Financial loans to customers with the worst FICO scores — below 540 — shot up 79% to more than $2.3 billion. The second worst category, 540-599, rose 28% from about $3.4 billion to $4.3 billion.
 
Prime loans, those above 660, dropped 42% to $676 million.
 
GM Financial provides just over 8% of GM's financing. Prior to 2006, GM's captive lending arm was GMAC, but GM sold a controlling stake in 2006. GMAC later renamed itself Ally Financial and continues to provide the bulk of GM's financing.
 
At the peak of the credit crisis and recession in late 2008, Ally announced that it would move away from subprime lending.
 
By spring 2010 GM's new management, led by North American executive Mark Reuss, wanted to move back into subprime, fearing that GM couldn't compete.
 
Subprime lending in cars is not as risky as in housing. Car loans are cheaper, so customers have an easier time making payments. When they do go into default, the cars can be repossessed and sold to recover some of the loss.
 
"The subprime market grew as a result of the recession," said GM spokesman Jim Cain. "Our experience, however, is that with proper management they are very good risks."
 
He points to GM's credit losses which have not risen above 5.5% since late 2010.
 
Nevertheless, since it acquired GM Financial, GM has seen its subprime loans grow from about 4.8% of sales in Q4 2010 to 8.2% in Q1 2012. The industry average is about 6%.
 
"Is GM taking on more risk than is safe given our uncertain economy?" asks Edward Niedermeyer, TheTruthAboutCars.com editor-at-large. "They may be trying to goose short-term sales with subprime lending to boost its stock price, which is tied to the government getting out of its GM investment."
 
GM still owes about $26.4 billion in direct aid to the federal government. The Treasury owns 26.5% of the automaker, or 500 million shares. The stock price would need to be 53 to recoup those taxpayer costs.
 
GM shares closed Friday at 19.67 after hitting a post-IPO low on Wednesday.
 
Subprime 'Double Standard'
 
When pushing the Dodd-Frank financial overhaul, Obama told Americans, "you have a stake in it if you've ever tried to take out a home loan, a car loan, or a student loan, and been targeted by the predatory practices of unscrupulous lenders."
 
While the administration has targeted subprime mortgage lending, it seems to have turned a blind eye to auto subprime loans.
 
"The Obama administration has seen to it that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is important in the subprime mortgage arena," said Niedermeyer. "But it has exempted auto-finance from that. I definitely think it is a double standard."
 
He also wonders if the Treasury will be able to recoup its GM aid: "The conventional wisdom has been that consumers have too much debt and need to de-leverage. Having that weak underlying foundation makes this rise into subprime lending by GM more worrisome."

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #262 on: July 31, 2012, 05:23:11 AM »
 :(

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #263 on: July 03, 2013, 06:59:00 AM »
LOL - re-read what you wrote chief. 



Sorry to burst everyone's bubbles around here, but by objective standards Obama has been a successful POTUS and a far more competent one than his predecessor. The primary such standard is the amount of legislation proposed/passed/implemented, a value that makes Obama far above average.

His foreign policy has been a success: his election instantly boosted world public opinion, which matters to the extent that it feeds into our soft power, or ability to influence others. His emphasis on multilateralism is sound and the operation in Libya to secure those oil resources for the world (no, democracy was not and almost never is the primary goal) was a stellar success that cost zero American lives and a mere $2 billion (we each payed a little over $6 for it). On the other hand his administration's emphasis on drone strikes and covert operations has won the war on terror: Al Qaeda has been genuinely ravaged and barely functions as an organization. Such operations included the personally-authorized killing of OBL, an important symbolic victory.

Things are more complex at home. Banking regulation was passed, which includes the Volcker Rule banning proprietary trading and other measures that are seemingly necessary to prevent another bailout, but nobody knows just how much regulation is optimal. Obama also stepped up and addressed the issue predecessors pussied out on, healthcare. The resultant legislation was a centrist plan (anyone who calls it 'socialist' has never been to Europe or examined their public policy) based on a conservative policy proposal that originated with the Heritage Foundation (a mandate to tackle the free riders that increase costs). That it may get struck down does not reflect on Obama as he has no control over SC deliberations to begin with. He can only be evaluated for his specific actions.

Finally, we come to the economy, which is what actually dtermines elections anyway. There is an extraordinary amount of confusion about this as  certain posters think we live in a system where the POTUS wields magical powers that determine the course of the economy. The misunderstanding is reinforced by presidents who take credit for growth and pundits who blame/credit everything happening to a president. The fact is this: we live in a capitalist where private actors control productivity. Corporations invest and hire/fire according to their plans, households only spend according to their perceptions of wealth, and banks lend in response to demand. Presidents do not control any of these variables, and can at best moderately nudge them in one or another direction.

Even considering this, CBO estimates put the number of jobs saved by the stimulus in the hundreds of thousands. The subsequent recovery has been tepid and has disappointed Obama and everybody else. But the point is, if the economic variables are all controlled by exogenous factors outside the WH, how can we lump all of the blame against Obama all the same? There is no evidence at all that a Republican president would have done anything differently, especially not since the stimuls contains much Friedman-esque monetary policy as is (the continued actions of the Fed belie the notion that the stimulus has been purely Keynesian).

In short, Obama has been an above-average president and performed admirably given the inherent limitations on the office (the position just isn't as powerful as many make it out to be) and the simply unprecedented circumstances inherited. People focus on the POTUS as a convenient symbol for everything the USG is doing and everything happening in the economy; the position is a convenient beacon for love and hate with a human face, when the real causality is mostly reserved for faceless machines comprised of the decisions of millions of individual actors (the USG + markets). People ought to understand as such when evaluating a US president.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #264 on: October 28, 2014, 12:35:01 PM »
 ;D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #265 on: October 28, 2014, 12:40:48 PM »
 :-[

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #266 on: October 28, 2014, 01:58:48 PM »
LOL - re-read what you wrote chief. 




Why dont you post an actual argument against Syntax's post?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39839
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #267 on: October 28, 2014, 02:15:34 PM »
His foreign policy has been a success: his election instantly boosted world public opinion, which matters to the extent that it feeds into our soft power, or ability to influence others. His emphasis on multilateralism is sound and the operation in Libya to secure those oil resources for the world (no, democracy was not and almost never is the primary goal) was a stellar success that cost zero American lives and a mere $2 billion (we each payed a little over $6 for it). On the other hand his administration's emphasis on drone strikes and covert operations has won the war on terror: Al Qaeda has been genuinely ravaged and barely functions as an organization. Such operations included the personally-authorized killing of OBL, an important symbolic victory.




 ::)

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama has been a successful POTUS
« Reply #268 on: October 28, 2014, 03:26:14 PM »
His foreign policy has been a success: his election instantly boosted world public opinion, which matters to the extent that it feeds into our soft power, or ability to influence others. His emphasis on multilateralism is sound and the operation in Libya to secure those oil resources for the world (no, democracy was not and almost never is the primary goal) was a stellar success that cost zero American lives and a mere $2 billion (we each payed a little over $6 for it). On the other hand his administration's emphasis on drone strikes and covert operations has won the war on terror: Al Qaeda has been genuinely ravaged and barely functions as an organization. Such operations included the personally-authorized killing of OBL, an important symbolic victory.
 ::)

Thank you.

Now what would you have done?