Author Topic: Obama: "If You've Been Successful, You Didn't Get There On Your Own" - lmfao!!  (Read 44974 times)

HavoX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
  • Shamed by thunderdome
The one that takes students to school, teachers to universities... The one your short bus rode as u licked the window. Again, hope this helps.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The one that takes students to school, teachers to universities... The one your short bus rode as u licked the window. Again, hope this helps.

What road did Thomas Jefferson drive on that he owed his brilliance to?

SLYY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • A mug only your mom could love...
What road did Thomas Jefferson drive on that he owed his brilliance to?

Doison is wondering what road makes him smarter.  Do YOU believe that there is a road that makes people smarter, 333386?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Doison is wondering what road makes him smarter.  Do YOU believe that there is a road that makes people smarter, 333386?

No. 

SLYY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • A mug only your mom could love...
No. 

Then I doubt anyone, including Thomas Jefferson, could owe their brilliance solely to a road or dirt path.  That said, he would not have been as successful if he was not mobile.  Thus, the path he chose to travel helped or assisted him in becoming successful (or brilliant).  I guess Obama and Romney were onto something...

HavoX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
  • Shamed by thunderdome
What road did Thomas Jefferson drive on that he owed his brilliance to?

U idiot. There weren't cars back then. He rode a horse, to college.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
U idiot. There weren't cars back then. He rode a horse, to college.


So the horse gets credit?

HavoX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1664
  • Shamed by thunderdome
U idiot. The guy who bred and trained, or broke the horse. The guy who made the saddle. The guys who built the college. The professors. The authors of the books he read. The publishers who made the books. And Jefferson himself.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
So, you say that you support a persons right to say any stupid shit they want.

And you bring up fr phelps and the god hates fags people when i ask you your view on where the right to freedom of speech comes from.  Despite my efforts to get you to answer, you keep hinting at the phelps family crazies.  So, you must support the right of the god hates fags people to say as much stupid shit as they want.  I tend to agree with you.  And while i disagree with what they are saying and find it not only distasteful but extremely socially abrasive an d just plain crazy.  I agree with your stance that the government need not get involved and that the organizations that have sprung up to stifel these people (patriot riders) can be organized freely amongst society.  This freely organized group of people has already employed tactics such as surrounding the phelps protests and reving their motorcycles to drown out their. Chants, and also using giant american flags so that the offensive signs of the phelps cant be seen.  I am glad to see that you support an individuals right to free speech.  And that if a community finds that speech distasteful, then they can use all tactics available to them within the law to stifle such speech witjout a government law necessary. 

If you live live in the US you have the right to say whatever crazy or offensive shit that you like (within reason of course, you might lose your job if you do it on the public airwaves or at your place of employment)

If you live in the US and can't figure out by now where your right to free speech comes from then I can't really help you anymore

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
The most helpful thing that you could do is zip your cock kisser Shirley. 

LOL

frustrated much

if you don't like the answer then feel free to stop asking stupid questions......if that is even possible for you which somehow I doubt


doison

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3448
  • Rum Ham
All I know is that I've been sitting around watching rich people live the high life since I was a kid.  It's bullshit that these rich-prick elites have people out there making them businesses and making them successful while I can't even get someone to give me a wad of twenties to take to the casino.  I don't even need the business or social status.  I wouldn't even complain if the only thing they did for me was make me rich.  
Y

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
All I know is that I've been sitting around watching rich people live the high life since I was a kid.  It's bullshit that these rich-prick elites have people out there making them businesses and making them successful while I can't even get someone to give me a wad of twenties to take to the casino.  I don't even need the business or social status.  I wouldn't even complain if the only thing they did for me was make me rich.  
Im a huge fan of your trolling. Very underrated.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana

Haha who is frustrated?  You really haven't come off as intelligent on here as you obviously are in your own mind.  Lol.

You have said much if nothing in this thread an were foaming at the mouth attacking and making fun of 3333.  You are very smart and enlightened indeed. ::)

you're entitled to your opinion as am I and everyone else


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
you're entitled to your opinion as am I and everyone else



Correct, unlike you, although I hate 99 percent of the Marxist bs you post, I would defend to the death your write to say it. 

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Correct, unlike you, although I hate 99 percent of the Marxist bs you post, I would defend to the death your write to say it. 

Fuck that.  I'd love to support a political party that espouses my views and shut down that opposition USSR-style.  I don't like freedom of speech when I disagree with that person.  If I had the power or were in a position to support a power that would shut down any opposing views I or the party I'm part of, I'd be all for it.

Are you telling me liberals would really like conservatives to continue spouting off at the mouth? And vice versa?  If given the opportunity, the opposition would be silenced quickly.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Fuck that.  I'd love to support a political party that espouses my views and shut down that opposition USSR-style.  I don't like freedom of speech when I disagree with that person.  If I had the power or were in a position to support a power that would shut down any opposing views I or the party I'm part of, I'd be all for it.

Are you telling me liberals would really like conservatives to continue spouting off at the mouth? And vice versa?  If given the opportunity, the opposition would be silenced quickly.

Liberals hate free speech but I want them spouting their crap openly.   

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Liberals hate free speech but I want them spouting their crap openly.   

True.  They're rather amusing, telling the rest of us how to live while they cower behind their ivory towers in gated communities in lushly manicured suburbs.  People only vote Democrat if they have something personal to gain(power or a couple bucks on their EBT card).

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Opinion: Obama "You Didn't Build That" Comment Incites Class Warfare
WYNC-FM ^ | July 20, 2012 | Karol Markowicz
Posted on July 20, 2012 10:07:24 PM EDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Ever since President Obama made his anti-business comments there has been an outcry by liberals that his words were taken out of context. I would never want to misquote my president so here is the full comment:

Look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.

The argument from the left goes that Obama didn't mean that you didn't build your business, just that you didn't build your own roads. Let's disregard for a moment that, as James Taranto points out, the grammar insists he meant business (singular-that) and not roads and bridges (plural-those). Let's forget that it is obvious to a mule (it sounds better in Russian--"kanyoo yasna") that most people didn't build their own roads. And let's not think about the fact that business owners, particularly successful ones demonized here, pay the high taxes that pay for those roads and bridges.

The theme in Obama's words is undeserved success. Obama didn't accidentally say that the successful didn't make it on their own. Take a good look at his opponent. Mitt Romney was born rich, that's true, (his father was a successful auto exec) but not the kind of rich he would eventually become on his own. Barack Obama was taking the world's most obvious shot at Mitt Romney for being successful and when it blew up in his face it became a case of being misquote or words taken out of context. That's simply not true. Most of Barack Obama's monetary success came from his bestselling books. Now we're supposed to believe that the man who earned his multi-million dollar wealth writing books clumsily tumbled over words. Unlikely.

The other reason that the president is attacking business owners is that it creates a convenient "us vs. them" dynamic in a time of high unemployment and economic uncertainty. Instead of taking responsibility that his policies have done nothing to improve our unemployment numbers, the president can instead turn the rage of the unemployed and underpaid onto those who have been successful.

It isn't Obama failing you, it's these rich people who don't recognize that your hard work helped get them there. Perhaps what the unemployed are really lacking is the same access to roads, bridges and teachers as the successful. Or perhaps Barack Obama is playing a class warfare game to win an election.

CAPTAIN INSANO

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2279

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Correct, unlike you, although I hate 99 percent of the Marxist bs you post, I would defend to the death your write to say it. 

didn't I just defend your right to say stupid and offensive shit

SLYY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • A mug only your mom could love...
Opinion: Obama "You Didn't Build That" Comment Incites Class Warfare
WYNC-FM ^ | July 20, 2012 | Karol Markowicz
Posted on July 20, 2012 10:07:24 PM EDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Ever since President Obama made his anti-business comments there has been an outcry by liberals that his words were taken out of context. I would never want to misquote my president so here is the full comment:

Look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there. If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen.

The argument from the left goes that Obama didn't mean that you didn't build your business, just that you didn't build your own roads. Let's disregard for a moment that, as James Taranto points out, the grammar insists he meant business (singular-that) and not roads and bridges (plural-those). Let's forget that it is obvious to a mule (it sounds better in Russian--"kanyoo yasna") that most people didn't build their own roads. And let's not think about the fact that business owners, particularly successful ones demonized here, pay the high taxes that pay for those roads and bridges.

The theme in Obama's words is undeserved success. Obama didn't accidentally say that the successful didn't make it on their own. Take a good look at his opponent. Mitt Romney was born rich, that's true, (his father was a successful auto exec) but not the kind of rich he would eventually become on his own. Barack Obama was taking the world's most obvious shot at Mitt Romney for being successful and when it blew up in his face it became a case of being misquote or words taken out of context. That's simply not true. Most of Barack Obama's monetary success came from his bestselling books. Now we're supposed to believe that the man who earned his multi-million dollar wealth writing books clumsily tumbled over words. Unlikely.

The other reason that the president is attacking business owners is that it creates a convenient "us vs. them" dynamic in a time of high unemployment and economic uncertainty. Instead of taking responsibility that his policies have done nothing to improve our unemployment numbers, the president can instead turn the rage of the unemployed and underpaid onto those who have been successful.

It isn't Obama failing you, it's these rich people who don't recognize that your hard work helped get them there. Perhaps what the unemployed are really lacking is the same access to roads, bridges and teachers as the successful. Or perhaps Barack Obama is playing a class warfare game to win an election.


July 18, 2012



I guess Karol Markowicz missed Romney's speech where he ended up agreeing with Obama.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Who gives a damn about myth? 

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40060
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Barack Obama is jealous of small business owners
Renew America ^ | 20 July 2012 | Tim Dunkin
Posted on July 21, 2012 10:08:43 AM EDT by Yashcheritsiy

Much has been made of the recent comments by President Obama concerning small businesses and those who create them, build them up, and turn them into productive participants in our economy. On July 13, Obama told a crowd of supporters in Roanoke, Virginia,

"There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn't — look, if you've been successful, you didn't get there on your own. You didn't get there on your own. I'm always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business — you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn't get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet."

So essentially, despite the recent spin and backtracking by his media handlers, Obama is saying that when an entrepreneur goes out and takes the personal risk of starting a business, invests his or her own sweat and tears into it, puts in years worth of 80+ hour weeks, and finally sees it come to fruition as a successful company, the entrepreneur is not really responsible for this. Instead, "everyone else" had a hand in it as well, since we're "all connected." In fact, the government made your success possible.

Now, what would possess somebody to say such a flabbergastingly idiotic thing? The government didn't give you the idea for your business. All the other smart and hardworking people out there didn't give you the innate intelligence or the work ethic to grind through the lean years that so often accompany starting a business from the ground up. All the roads and bridges in the country didn't translate your idea from a blueprint into a tangible product. And let's not forget that as a taxpayer, the entrepreneur his or herself helped to make those roads and bridges a reality — not the other way around. So how is it that Obama — ostensibly an intelligent man (though I'm not convinced of this, myself) — would make such a foolish and ignorant comment?

The answer, of course, is that Obama — and others like him on the Left — are jealous of small business owners and other productive people. Let's face it, to be a hard-core leftist, to be a part of the network of politicos and bureaucrats and activists and community organizers and the like, does not require either much intelligence or much work ethic. All it requires is an ability and willingness to remember talking points off of a memo and to show up and wave a sign whenever you're needed. President Obama himself exemplifies this — he got hooked into the leftist network at an early age, and has had everything since more or less handed to him for free. However, a person like this who knows that they didn't really earn what they have and probably couldn't if they were forced to try will naturally be envious of those more capable than themselves. I am reminded of Robert Heinlein's statement,

"A competent and self-confident person is incapable of jealousy in anything. Jealousy is invariably a symptom of neurotic insecurity."

Ultimately, those on the Left like Obama envy those who can do the things that they can't — produce, be successful, benefit others through the enlightened self-interest that makes capitalism the greatest wealth-generating engine known to man. Obama wants to take credit away from those who worked hard and created businesses, and give it to "everyone." This is a strongly socialist impulse — it is spreading around the "wealth" of credit for individual success. You were only successful because "society" and "the government" made you successful. This sentiment betrays Obama and the Left's neuroticism and enviousness.

There are several specific reason why they are jealous of producers and creators.

First of all, there is the simple fact that successful business owners (as well as others who are productive and excel in their chosen fields) don't need anyone else's help. They don't need the government to step in and give them a leg up. They don't need the myriad of welfare programs that leftists love to ensnare people with. Indeed, government that goes beyond its constitutional limits of keeping the peace and protecting us from invasion generally tends to get in the way of productive individuals and companies, rather than helping them.

This is grossly offensive to leftists. Leftists love to use the power of the state to give them ability that they otherwise would not have. They love the sense of power and ego that derives from believing they are "helping" all those people on welfare and food stamps and other forms of public assistance. If you don't need their "help," they take that as a personal insult. This is especially true with this President, whose narcissism and sense of personal importance make it very difficult for him to contemplate the idea of merely leaving other people alone to prosper and succeed without his "help." If they try, well, he'll make sure they see the error of their ways. He'll tear them down to the point where they have to rely on him and his cronies. Socialists hate successful individual existence apart from government. Indeed, they believe "individualism" is a dirty word.

Another reason for Obama's jealousy of business owners and creators is that they are hardworking. A small business owner doesn't just get to punch his eight hours into the clock and go home to vegetate in front of a television. Instead, successful small business owners often spend years putting in excessive hours and taking no vacations before they finally see the benefit of their hard work and sacrifice. Starting a successful small business is not for the faint of heart. It requires a strong work ethic as well as ingenuity and a willingness to forgo short term pleasures for long-term benefits.

Meanwhile, the only long hours that President Putting Green has been putting in are on the links, working on his mulligans. That, and taking extravagant taxpayer-funded vacations. Obama has treated the Presidency like a set of perks that happens to come with a little bit of work occasionally. This goes back to his history of having everything handed to him by the leftist network. He got to be President of the Harvard Law Review, a sinecure which he spent producing basically no intellectual work to speak of. His university years are a mystery, since his transcripts are sealed and he and his crew absolutely refuse to open them. One suspects that this might be because Obama's grades in college were pitifully poor, again belying a lack of work ethic. Even Obama's most prestigious award, the Nobel Peace Prize, was completely unearned. After all, he received it a mere ten days after taking office — hardly time for him to have done anything on the international scene, even if he were the hardest working man on the planet. No, it seems that the only thing that really moves Obama to strenuous activity is fundraising for his re-election campaign.

Yet another source for Obama's envy of the successful and productive is the very fact of what they do — they produce. They create. They make things that are beneficial for other people while they are profiting from their investment. Entrepreneurs, business owners, productive people — these genuinely make the world a better place by adding to the sum total of the wealth and production in the world. They take low-value raw materials and turn them into high-value goods that people want to buy so as to improve their own standards of living. They take ideas — which in and of themselves do nothing — and translate them into tangible products that advance society, science, the arts, and our very lives.

On the other hand, people like Obama do none of these things. Instead, Obama and his ilk are barbarians. They destroy, pillage, loot, tear down, and wipe out. They use the powers of the state to destroy the livelihood and ability to prosper of other people. They take our property, they hinder our ability to develop and use it, they seek to pull down everybody to the same subsistence level. They are like the barbarians who roared through the Roman Empire, burning the fields, pillaging the cities, taking away the villas and homes and crops that somebody else had worked hard to produce. They can do no other, for socialism is the creed of the destroyer. Socialism can only take from the successful individual — it can never give. To Obama and people like him, those of us who are productive and working to be successful are the kulaks — people ripe for being cleared out of the way and dispossessed so that the wealth can be "spread around."

Lastly, one trait of the successful business owner that invokes Obama's jealousy is that they are competent. A small business that makes it, that stands the test of the years, that maybe eventually even turns into a big business, is a testimony to the proven track record for success of its owner and creator. Incompetent and unable people do not create businesses that last. Foresight, dedication, skill, intelligence, character — these are all traits of competent people who build companies and become job-producers.

Obama displays none of these. His track record is one of failure, not success. Everything the man touches turns into a colossal catastrophe. His vaunted stimulus plan proved to be less than useless — it was a positive drag on the economy that sucked needed capital away from job producers and ended up pushing us close to double-digit unemployment (by the U3 reckoning, we're actually way past that by the more realistic U6 calculation). He tried to push government money into "green jobs," only to see companies like Solyndra collapse under their own inefficiencies. His health care plan is already destroying jobs and driving wealth-producers away from this country. His touch is the anti-Midas — it takes everything golden and turns it into garbage.

In short, Obama is a contemptible little man who hates and fears those more capable than himself, just like most everyone else on the Left does. I supposed that in a sense, the productive people, the successful, the hard-workers, the capitalistic-minded in this country should take this as a complement. Indeed, as Fulton Sheen has said,

"Jealousy is the tribute mediocrity pays to genius."

Unfortunately, Obama and the Left's jealousies can result in very real, very detrimental, consequences for our nation and her people. Left to themselves, the Left would destroy every last one of us, reducing us to a state of dependency and bare subsistence. We have to fight to prevent this, no matter what the cost to us may be. The Left must not merely be defeated, it must be destroyed root and branch if we're to have the liberty to be free to prosper and produce as we can.

SLYY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1364
  • A mug only your mom could love...
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Barack Obama is jealous of small business owners
Renew America ^ | 20 July 2012 | Tim Dunkin
Posted on July 21, 2012 10:08:43 AM EDT by Yashcheritsiy

Much has been made of the recent comments by President Obama concerning small businesses and those who create them, build them up, and turn them into productive participants in our economy. On July 13, Obama told a crowd of supporters in Roanoke, Virginia,

"There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me — because they want to give something back. They know they didn't — look, if you've been successful, you didn't get there on your own. You didn't get there on your own. I'm always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something — there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you've got a business — you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn't get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet."

So essentially, despite the recent spin and backtracking by his media handlers, Obama is saying that when an entrepreneur goes out and takes the personal risk of starting a business, invests his or her own sweat and tears into it, puts in years worth of 80+ hour weeks, and finally sees it come to fruition as a successful company, the entrepreneur is not really responsible for this. Instead, "everyone else" had a hand in it as well, since we're "all connected." In fact, the government made your success possible.

Now, what would possess somebody to say such a flabbergastingly idiotic thing? The government didn't give you the idea for your business. All the other smart and hardworking people out there didn't give you the innate intelligence or the work ethic to grind through the lean years that so often accompany starting a business from the ground up. All the roads and bridges in the country didn't translate your idea from a blueprint into a tangible product. And let's not forget that as a taxpayer, the entrepreneur his or herself helped to make those roads and bridges a reality — not the other way around. So how is it that Obama — ostensibly an intelligent man (though I'm not convinced of this, myself) — would make such a foolish and ignorant comment?

The answer, of course, is that Obama — and others like him on the Left — are jealous of small business owners and other productive people. Let's face it, to be a hard-core leftist, to be a part of the network of politicos and bureaucrats and activists and community organizers and the like, does not require either much intelligence or much work ethic. All it requires is an ability and willingness to remember talking points off of a memo and to show up and wave a sign whenever you're needed. President Obama himself exemplifies this — he got hooked into the leftist network at an early age, and has had everything since more or less handed to him for free. However, a person like this who knows that they didn't really earn what they have and probably couldn't if they were forced to try will naturally be envious of those more capable than themselves. I am reminded of Robert Heinlein's statement,

"A competent and self-confident person is incapable of jealousy in anything. Jealousy is invariably a symptom of neurotic insecurity."

Ultimately, those on the Left like Obama envy those who can do the things that they can't — produce, be successful, benefit others through the enlightened self-interest that makes capitalism the greatest wealth-generating engine known to man. Obama wants to take credit away from those who worked hard and created businesses, and give it to "everyone." This is a strongly socialist impulse — it is spreading around the "wealth" of credit for individual success. You were only successful because "society" and "the government" made you successful. This sentiment betrays Obama and the Left's neuroticism and enviousness.

There are several specific reason why they are jealous of producers and creators.

First of all, there is the simple fact that successful business owners (as well as others who are productive and excel in their chosen fields) don't need anyone else's help. They don't need the government to step in and give them a leg up. They don't need the myriad of welfare programs that leftists love to ensnare people with. Indeed, government that goes beyond its constitutional limits of keeping the peace and protecting us from invasion generally tends to get in the way of productive individuals and companies, rather than helping them.

This is grossly offensive to leftists. Leftists love to use the power of the state to give them ability that they otherwise would not have. They love the sense of power and ego that derives from believing they are "helping" all those people on welfare and food stamps and other forms of public assistance. If you don't need their "help," they take that as a personal insult. This is especially true with this President, whose narcissism and sense of personal importance make it very difficult for him to contemplate the idea of merely leaving other people alone to prosper and succeed without his "help." If they try, well, he'll make sure they see the error of their ways. He'll tear them down to the point where they have to rely on him and his cronies. Socialists hate successful individual existence apart from government. Indeed, they believe "individualism" is a dirty word.

Another reason for Obama's jealousy of business owners and creators is that they are hardworking. A small business owner doesn't just get to punch his eight hours into the clock and go home to vegetate in front of a television. Instead, successful small business owners often spend years putting in excessive hours and taking no vacations before they finally see the benefit of their hard work and sacrifice. Starting a successful small business is not for the faint of heart. It requires a strong work ethic as well as ingenuity and a willingness to forgo short term pleasures for long-term benefits.

Meanwhile, the only long hours that President Putting Green has been putting in are on the links, working on his mulligans. That, and taking extravagant taxpayer-funded vacations. Obama has treated the Presidency like a set of perks that happens to come with a little bit of work occasionally. This goes back to his history of having everything handed to him by the leftist network. He got to be President of the Harvard Law Review, a sinecure which he spent producing basically no intellectual work to speak of. His university years are a mystery, since his transcripts are sealed and he and his crew absolutely refuse to open them. One suspects that this might be because Obama's grades in college were pitifully poor, again belying a lack of work ethic. Even Obama's most prestigious award, the Nobel Peace Prize, was completely unearned. After all, he received it a mere ten days after taking office — hardly time for him to have done anything on the international scene, even if he were the hardest working man on the planet. No, it seems that the only thing that really moves Obama to strenuous activity is fundraising for his re-election campaign.

Yet another source for Obama's envy of the successful and productive is the very fact of what they do — they produce. They create. They make things that are beneficial for other people while they are profiting from their investment. Entrepreneurs, business owners, productive people — these genuinely make the world a better place by adding to the sum total of the wealth and production in the world. They take low-value raw materials and turn them into high-value goods that people want to buy so as to improve their own standards of living. They take ideas — which in and of themselves do nothing — and translate them into tangible products that advance society, science, the arts, and our very lives.

On the other hand, people like Obama do none of these things. Instead, Obama and his ilk are barbarians. They destroy, pillage, loot, tear down, and wipe out. They use the powers of the state to destroy the livelihood and ability to prosper of other people. They take our property, they hinder our ability to develop and use it, they seek to pull down everybody to the same subsistence level. They are like the barbarians who roared through the Roman Empire, burning the fields, pillaging the cities, taking away the villas and homes and crops that somebody else had worked hard to produce. They can do no other, for socialism is the creed of the destroyer. Socialism can only take from the successful individual — it can never give. To Obama and people like him, those of us who are productive and working to be successful are the kulaks — people ripe for being cleared out of the way and dispossessed so that the wealth can be "spread around."

Lastly, one trait of the successful business owner that invokes Obama's jealousy is that they are competent. A small business that makes it, that stands the test of the years, that maybe eventually even turns into a big business, is a testimony to the proven track record for success of its owner and creator. Incompetent and unable people do not create businesses that last. Foresight, dedication, skill, intelligence, character — these are all traits of competent people who build companies and become job-producers.

Obama displays none of these. His track record is one of failure, not success. Everything the man touches turns into a colossal catastrophe. His vaunted stimulus plan proved to be less than useless — it was a positive drag on the economy that sucked needed capital away from job producers and ended up pushing us close to double-digit unemployment (by the U3 reckoning, we're actually way past that by the more realistic U6 calculation). He tried to push government money into "green jobs," only to see companies like Solyndra collapse under their own inefficiencies. His health care plan is already destroying jobs and driving wealth-producers away from this country. His touch is the anti-Midas — it takes everything golden and turns it into garbage.

In short, Obama is a contemptible little man who hates and fears those more capable than himself, just like most everyone else on the Left does. I supposed that in a sense, the productive people, the successful, the hard-workers, the capitalistic-minded in this country should take this as a complement. Indeed, as Fulton Sheen has said,

"Jealousy is the tribute mediocrity pays to genius."

Unfortunately, Obama and the Left's jealousies can result in very real, very detrimental, consequences for our nation and her people. Left to themselves, the Left would destroy every last one of us, reducing us to a state of dependency and bare subsistence. We have to fight to prevent this, no matter what the cost to us may be. The Left must not merely be defeated, it must be destroyed root and branch if we're to have the liberty to be free to prosper and produce as we can.

333386, see if you can email Tim Dunkin this link, so that he is aware that Romney feels the same way as Obama. Let's do our best to keep voters informed.



July, 18, 2012