Many years ago, if someone had a tatoo, they were considered a non-conformist..someone possibly trying to express their individuality..or in the case of women back then, they were probably biker chicks, strippers, or porn stars. Nowadays, every guy I see in the gym has some kind of tattoo on their arm or some tribal shit. It seems it's almost become mandatory. If you don't have one, you're not cool. In fact, now you're a non-conformist if you don't have one. I'm glad I've never felt pressured to adapt to ridiculous social trends and be of the mindset of "Well, I have to get this..everybody else has one!"
bullshit logic. if anything, the mainstream adaptation of tattoos has been a good thing. like you said, it used to be that if you got a tattoo your motivation was largely rebellion, so you'd go to some shitty shop with a guy that probably smoked while he did it and wasn't very sanitary so you could get some random skull or a symbol just to make yourself feel tough.
now that tattoos are more acceptable, people are free to get them simply for the personal satisfaction of having them, and more people are getting them simply because THEY like them, not for the stupid "oh i'm such a badass" feel. i got my tattoos for ME, and frankly the nice thing about them is that if i wear a loose t-shirt they're hidden.
and no, amazingly, no one looks at people without tattoos and thinks they're non-conformist, because the "conformity" aspect has been ripped away from tattoos. if you have them or if you don't, the overall acceptance of them now means that there is no conformity TO them. if you have them, it means you want 'em. if not, it means you don't.
the only time people WITH tattoos get on the offensive is when some asshole like you tries to use his lack of ink as a badge of pride. news flash: i don't care if you don't want tattoos. it's your choice, just like anything else. my tattoos are MY choice. i respect your decisions, PLEASE respect mine.