What is the difference between the graphic you posted and the four elements I posted?
I'm not trying hard to do anything. I don't believe religion is synonymous with religion. I don't believe the Bible is a science book. I believe in the four elements I posted, which come straight from scientists.
Same question I asked Archer: can you explain the origin of life on earth using the scientific method, or whatever other facts you think are available?
Where in the graphic i posted, from a credible site, does it use or say the word prediction or synonym of? Also, does the 4 steps you posted cover all the steps in the graphic? Which scientists do your 4 steps come directly from?
I am not a scientist. But there are theories out there based on researched and tested facts.
What facts are the Bible's account tested on?
Of the two, science and the Bible, which finds their facts more based on faith or more based on facts?
Of the two, which strive to find the truth based on facts or which of them have already accepted as the truth? And what's that truth based on? Written word? Or research and testing using the scientific method i posted above?
Of the two which use detailed explanations and which use parable a vague passages written by primitive bronze age men?
Lets take a look at the word faith:
faith
[feyth]
noun
1.confidence or trust in a person or thing: faith in another's ability.
2.
belief that is not based on proof: He had faith that the hypothesis would be substantiated by fact.3.belief in God or in the doctrines or teachings of religion: the firm faith of the Pilgrims.
4.belief in anything, as a code of ethics, standards of merit, etc.: to be of the same faith with someone concerning honesty.
5.a system of religious belief: the Christian faith; the Jewish faith.
How is the word FAITH even remotely close to the scientific method i posted above? .....where the hypothesis is tested for proof?
Nope Faith is far from the right word when it comes to the scientific method.