You do know that in many domestic violence cases, the victim recants or changes the story so that the other person doesn't "get in trouble"?
Also, just because someone has a key, doesn't mean that they are still dating.
Bottomline, she could be dating two people---they are on a off again, on again relationship.
They do porn, we don't know the parameters of their relationship. We assume, monogamous, but we don't know.
What we do know is that their relationship is dysfunctional and abusive.
There are no sides to be taken.
What part of the statement
"she (Christy Mack) identified Koppenhaver (warmachine) as her boyfriend" don't you understand. Look, we get it, you're a classic white knight who places all women on a pedestal and to maintain that ridiculous ideal you conjure up all types of absurd scenarios to maintain your obvious delusion.
And you do know in many domestic violence cases, the (scorned) victim embellishes the story so the perpetrator gets in more trouble.
And the absurdity of your argument was clearly exposed when you suggested that an ex would still be granted access to the house with his own personal key. You are really grasping at straws.
And while we do know there relationship was extremely dysfunctional, as usual it is the man who is paying the ultimate price for it. Meanwhile Christy will be free to continue manipulating, provoking, using and abusing men with impunity for the rest of her days and granted the status of victim all the while.
And what do you mean there are no sides to be taken. A man's liberty hangs in the balance, it is imperative that the truth is exposed and justice served and not just some twisted retribution served up for all the crazy white knights and feminists out there.