You are beginning to sound like a broken record. You persist in using a false analogy, a straw man, even after you were corrected. As if factual sources were in any way biased. Science depends on the careful evaluation of evidence. Then again there is no point in bothering with evidence, is there? What is an evolutionist to do when facts get in the way?
http://creation.mobi/a/43Website says adam and eve were the first humans. Yep...
"Those who do not believe in Christ are subject to everlasting conscious punishment, but believers enjoy eternal life with God." - creation.com...yep, sounds totally credible. Omfg thats a creepy ass site
Going to get all my research and science background from that site now.
"Facts are always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information. By definition, therefore, no interpretation of facts in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record."-creation.com...so all facts are not facts unless it says so in the bible. Wow.... Sounds totally reasonable and unbiased. Total fail.