You challenge the bible, but often do so only from your worldview. You refuse to allow God's divine nature to be what it is. If the providence of God is removed then you've essentially created something new that allows your arguments to hold, but it's not scripture. Although, atheists love to step in and out of the Christian worldview as they see fit....the taxi cab fallacy I believe it's called.
What is my own worldview? how do you know I refuse to allow God's divine nature blah blah... you are making all these assumptions as if you are correct, that's the issue.
Always the flood, but always from a perspective of naturalism when the entire event was governed by God's divine providence. Of course all of the events of the flood don't work from a purely naturalistic perspective because your argument necessitates that God can't be God. God must only be or not be what suits your worldview and you refuse to entertain otherwise. Although it's not my problem and it's an invention of your mind that does not represent scripture.
You call it illogic when in fact logic itself is transcendent and exists with or without the natural world and your mind (folks get this concept backwards).....the transcendent nature of logic is consistent with the infinite, transcendent nature of God and is grounded in him. In fact the moment you engage logic you've entered the Christian worldview (and exited atheism) and are thereby bound by it's axioms.
The pure irony in the first post is mindblowing. My worldview is called "reality", never ever have the laws of physics been violated, predictions of the past and future are couched in the belief of a rational universe (it works). If God is up there picking and choosing when to intervene his plan or rules are poor which doesn't make any sense in light of his attributes.
So you clearly see the absurdity of a literal noah's ark, but you still actually believed it existed? but instead god divinely feed the animals etc... is that your position?
I am not sure you understand what logic is, it's the study and use of valid reasoning generally. So if reason is grounded in the almighty my friend, why does everything you say make no sense at all?
I can reason, if this is his creation, if that book is his best work etc.. then he is a moron. Which is it? faith of reason? you can't have both because it makes no fucking sense.
If actual life if an employee came up to you and said he broke something due to devil spirits forcing him too, what would you say? you would use reason to determine if he is telling the truth. God is unreasonable throughout the bible, I have a hard time buying he is all that smart, reminds me of sheep herders.