Author Topic: Dave Henry looked great  (Read 4457 times)

M1

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 397
Dave Henry looked great
« on: February 22, 2006, 05:23:55 AM »
it was very close between him and Lee me thought  :o

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8576
  • TKU
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2006, 05:51:55 AM »
that's probably why they were 1st and 2nd

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2006, 05:55:01 AM »
Look how Henry is shorter then Lee haha.

DEFCON

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
  • LSD, 100 µg, i.m.
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2006, 07:07:19 AM »
Look how Henry is shorter then Lee haha.
that is sad

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2006, 07:46:40 AM »
im surprised m1 didnt post a picture of their backsides
Z

Euro-monster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7583
  • Team Dutchie style!!
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2006, 08:17:40 AM »
look at the face of Lee......that truely is a face of a winner....
?

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #6 on: February 22, 2006, 08:40:34 AM »
What is the average height for a bodybuilder?   ???

It makes Gunter and Ronnie all the more impressive.  It seems that you need stature to win the Olympia (minimum 5'8), yet if you go much higher than that it makes it hard to put on the mass required to win the whole show.

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #7 on: February 22, 2006, 09:20:34 AM »
I would say 5"7 is the average for bber

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19464
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2006, 06:00:24 AM »
im surprised m1 didnt post a picture of their backsides

Sshh...

Don't instigate.

YIP
Zack
As empty as paradise

Man of Steel

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19404
  • Isaiah40:28-31 ✝ Romans10:9 ✝ 1Peter3:15
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2006, 10:03:12 AM »
Oh crap, Alves forgot his calves again.    :-\



MOS

hillbilly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 966
  • LOOK! the crazy cat is back and packing a gat!
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2006, 10:13:02 AM »
look at the face of Lee......that truely is a face of a winner....

look at davids face! man he looks pissed!

the choad

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1102
  • King Of All Meltdowns
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2006, 11:37:04 AM »
M1 is really the true adonis....That's what ron said when we were both in the time out board.

Mechanic

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Getbig!
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2006, 12:34:33 PM »
This is one very impressive back!! Henry looked awesome at the Ironman. Physiques like Henry's and Lee's should be the new standard..unbelievable how someone who looks pregnant and has the esthetics of a refrigerator could place ahead of these guys  :-X
Small waists and beautiful lines should be the most important judging criteria, not the large, larger, largest contest that started with Dorian..if this trend continues in a couple of years they might as well haul a rhino on stage and crown that Mr. Olympia   :'(

Dark_Matter

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 27
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2006, 05:58:29 PM »
Look how Henry is shorter then Lee haha.
LMAO, so he's what then 5'1"?

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Dave Henry looked great
« Reply #14 on: February 23, 2006, 06:03:50 PM »
Dave looks great. Hope he places where he deserves.
just push some weight!