Author Topic: Former FBI Chief Admits Chemtrails Are Real And Then He Is Poisoned And Dies  (Read 80129 times)

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
question.... why did oswald get taken out right away?

maybe he was going to have a big mouth?

Or maybe that was the plan all along who knows. Even in the underworld its common for the 'assassin' to get assassinated after the job's been done. Best way to cover your tracks.

Kind of like the '3 can keep a secret if two are dead' theory.

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Or maybe that was the plan all along who knows. Even in the underworld its common for the 'assassin' to get assassinated after the job's been done. Best way to cover your tracks.

Kind of like the '3 can keep a secret if two are dead' theory.

thats the only explanation I thought of.. otherwise who would care enough to go off oswald so in the open and then disappear into oblivion...

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
thats the only explanation I thought of.. otherwise who would care enough to go off oswald so in the open and then disappear into oblivion...

Exactly. Overall it was a complete clusterfuck of a cover up.

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
You are the assclown, who doesn't know difference between science and lies.

I am? And from two of us, you are the foil hat moron who deny all the facts and rely on pure fiction. Maybe you should get a dictionary and finally find out what is the meaning of the words what you are throwing at me  ;D

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
well it was either oswald or an agent/merc who pulled the trigger clearly but its a question of who directed it. if oswald did it he was setup

It was what the evidence prove it was. How this is so hard to get in the tiny brains of you guys? You can claim this and that, but only what you can prove have some kind of value. I quote Vincent Bugliosi, who spent 21 years to investigating not only assassination, but also all of the foil hat theories about it. He said: " There were 53 clear evidence pointing guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever". I think it make this quite clear, isn't it? This Bugliosi write a book of 1,632-pages, with a CD-ROM containing an additional 1,000+ pages of footnotes. I have to say that 21 years and this book is quite a bit more than any of you guys have done to study this case, so because of that, I trust what he has written.

It happen 52 years ago, and still there is 0 evidence which would give even reasonable doubt that there were any other participant involved the assassination. There is rumors, different kind of claims and lies, but try to understand that all that crap doesn't mean anything, because there is no evidence. This is how the foil hat morons work. They say that world is flat, and they repeat it everywhere and all the time, and the most stupid part of humankind start to believe it. Why in the name of hell no one ask them to prove it? It will never come to mind, when there is a hurry to spread the word..

What Bugliosi did, he study every one of the theories which he could find, and prove them to be lies. It wasn't hard task for him, because foil hats are so obvious in their stories, that even a child can see faults in their theories. It wasn't driver who shot, not agent or merc, it was Oswald. How come? Because there is evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever, and 53 real, rock hard evidence pointing guilty of Oswald. Everything else is bullshit, made by foil hat morons during 52 years of time. Even the claim that Warren commission order those document so be secret xxx years, is a lie. It is in the law, it wasn't in hands of Warren or anybody else. Warren commission just obey the law and the protocol.

agenda21nwo

  • Guest
It was what the evidence prove it was. How this is so hard to get in the tiny brains of you guys? You can claim this and that, but only what you can prove have some kind of value. I quote Vincent Bugliosi, who spent 21 years to investigating not only assassination, but also all of the foil hat theories about it. He said: " There were 53 clear evidence pointing guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever". I think it make this quite clear, isn't it? This Bugliosi write a book of 1,632-pages, with a CD-ROM containing an additional 1,000+ pages of footnotes. I have to say that 21 years and this book is quite a bit more than any of you guys have done to study this case, so because of that, I trust what he has written.

It happen 52 years ago, and still there is 0 evidence which would give even reasonable doubt that there were any other participant involved the assassination. There is rumors, different kind of claims and lies, but try to understand that all that crap doesn't mean anything, because there is no evidence. This is how the foil hat morons work. They say that world is flat, and they repeat it everywhere and all the time, and the most stupid part of humankind start to believe it. Why in the name of hell no one ask them to prove it? It will never come to mind, when there is a hurry to spread the word..

What Bugliosi did, he study every one of the theories which he could find, and prove them to be lies. It wasn't hard task for him, because foil hats are so obvious in their stories, that even a child can see faults in their theories. It wasn't driver who shot, not agent or merc, it was Oswald. How come? Because there is evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever, and 53 real, rock hard evidence pointing guilty of Oswald. Everything else is bullshit, made by foil hat morons during 52 years of time. Even the claim that Warren commission order those document so be secret xxx years, is a lie. It is in the law, it wasn't in hands of Warren or anybody else. Warren commission just obey the law and the protocol.

More proof you are stupid.  He never said it wasn't Oswald.

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
It was what the evidence prove it was. How this is so hard to get in the tiny brains of you guys? You can claim this and that, but only what you can prove have some kind of value. I quote Vincent Bugliosi, who spent 21 years to investigating not only assassination, but also all of the foil hat theories about it. He said: " There were 53 clear evidence pointing guilty of Oswald, and 0 evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever". I think it make this quite clear, isn't it? This Bugliosi write a book of 1,632-pages, with a CD-ROM containing an additional 1,000+ pages of footnotes. I have to say that 21 years and this book is quite a bit more than any of you guys have done to study this case, so because of that, I trust what he has written.

It happen 52 years ago, and still there is 0 evidence which would give even reasonable doubt that there were any other participant involved the assassination. There is rumors, different kind of claims and lies, but try to understand that all that crap doesn't mean anything, because there is no evidence. This is how the foil hat morons work. They say that world is flat, and they repeat it everywhere and all the time, and the most stupid part of humankind start to believe it. Why in the name of hell no one ask them to prove it? It will never come to mind, when there is a hurry to spread the word..

What Bugliosi did, he study every one of the theories which he could find, and prove them to be lies. It wasn't hard task for him, because foil hats are so obvious in their stories, that even a child can see faults in their theories. It wasn't driver who shot, not agent or merc, it was Oswald. How come? Because there is evidence pointing towards any other participant what so ever, and 53 real, rock hard evidence pointing guilty of Oswald. Everything else is bullshit, made by foil hat morons during 52 years of time. Even the claim that Warren commission order those document so be secret xxx years, is a lie. It is in the law, it wasn't in hands of Warren or anybody else. Warren commission just obey the law and the protocol.

The courts were bought you idiot. 'The evidence' lol  ::)

Hulk-smash!

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1463
  • All the muscle in the world!
Gunderson :was married to Anton LeVay's ex-wife.
I

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
The courts were bought you idiot. 'The evidence' lol  ::)

Again, it is quite easy to say, but just for the laughs, try to prove me wrong? Regarding Bugliosi, there was 53 evidence pointing to guilty of Oswald. What do you have? Blind faith to the internet bullshit, to some foil hats idiotic theory with no evidence what so ever? There is two undeniably facts in this case: 1. they have lie to you 2. "they" isn't those you think they are  ;D
                                           

agenda21nwo

  • Guest
Gunderson :was married to Anton LeVay's ex-wife.

Yes, Satanism is everywhere at these high levels. 

Automation

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1780
Yes, Satanism is everywhere at these high levels. 

Nothing wrong with LeVayan Satanism. Pretty solid philosophy.

Hail Satan!

agenda21nwo

  • Guest
Nothing wrong with LeVayan Satanism. Pretty solid philosophy.

Hail Satan!

Did your father abuse you?

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Again, it is quite easy to say, but just for the laughs, try to prove me wrong? Regarding Bugliosi, there was 53 evidence pointing to guilty of Oswald. What do you have? Blind faith to the internet bullshit, to some foil hats idiotic theory with no evidence what so ever? There is two undeniably facts in this case: 1. they have lie to you 2. "they" isn't those you think they are  ;D
                                           

Courts are bought all the time nimrod.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941

The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
ROPO destroying these tinfoil hat imbeciles.

don't be too thorough in your destruction, ya gotta realize these are fat, antisocial losers with nothing else happening in their lives, have  a heart  :D

LMFAO...Where's this guy?

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895





Apropos, can you tell me, if you look at the could's in the horizon, why they all are flat at the bottom? Just like these:



Could it have something to do with the fact, that there is many different layers in the atmosphere, with the different temperature, different moisture % and different direction of the wind. In your add to the "stupid videos", all the planes fly at the 20-35 000 feet, high above the clouds, so tell me this: How they will know where the chemicals will land, while there is winds for every direction you can name of, all between the plane and earth? Or is it some kind of random- geo engineering? Let's drop this hideous toxin (which no one knows what it is) to here and just wait and see which country it will poison? Oops, it rain on my own backyard...

Do you guys really think that there is anyone stupid enough to believe that crap, excluding a bunch of foil hat morons?


The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
[ Invalid YouTube link ]


Kim Jong Bob

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7593
  • KIM JONG IL ORIGINAL BEATIFULL MAN WITH GLASSES
Just posting a video of this guy shows thqt you are one of the tinfoilhats that believes everything and dont even recearch the claims as long as it fits your consoiracytheory agenda...this guy is nut, pure crazy and has been lying about sick and weird things for years...satanist that eats babies in your goverment i think it was etc haha

Twaddle

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7312
Since according to the sheep the Government never lies... ::)


http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification/


go ahead.. deny the government document as well..LOL

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/Weather%20Modification%20-%20Programs,%20Problems,%20Policy,%20And%20Potential%20%28May%201978,%20784%20pages%29.pdf

Ummmmm, did you even read the document that you posted, or did you just link it, because it's on your tinhat site?  That article is referencing "cloud seeding".  Cloud seeding is a very open and public topic.  If successful, cloud seeding would be a great achievement for mankind.  Why wouldn't the government want to work on this?  There are no hidden agendas in that document.  There is a great deal of very beneficial research in that document.  I for one hope that cloud seeding becomes a reality one day.  It would mean no more droughts, floods, famine, etc.  However, if it ever does become a reality, it won't be at the hands of the government. 

Thanks for posting that article.  It shows that our government was ahead of it's time in trying to find solutions for humanity.   :D

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Ummmmm, did you even read the document that you posted, or did you just link it, because it's on your tinhat site?  That article is referencing "cloud seeding".  Cloud seeding is a very open and public topic.  If successful, cloud seeding would be a great achievement for mankind.  Why wouldn't the government want to work on this?  There are no hidden agendas in that document.  There is a great deal of very beneficial research in that document.  I for one hope that cloud seeding becomes a reality one day.  It would mean no more droughts, floods, famine, etc.  However, if it ever does become a reality, it won't be at the hands of the government. 

Thanks for posting that article.  It shows that our government was ahead of it's time in trying to find solutions for humanity.   :D

Well, intelligence hasn't never been a strong point of these foil hat idiots. As you may have seen, they start this thread about the chemtrails, and when they realize that it is idiotic and impossible theory, they start to talk about Geoengineering which as we know, isn't any secret at all. For these idiots it is just same thing, it miraculously enables all their stupid theories no matter how impossible they are. They doesn't understand the difference between cloud seeding of one cloud, and making chemtrails through a 14 hour flight. These idiots cannot comprehend volumes and amounts, they are ready to put a 1000 liters of liquid in the 1 liter can  ;D

PS. Did you see any answers to the question I make few comments back? Neither did I, because what these imbeciles have, is only questions which they read from the foil hat sites. There isn't any answers in there, so when they see question here, they cannot answer because would require the use of their own brains. This is something these sheeples cannot do, because they doesn't have any own thoughts  at all  ;D

Kim Jong Bob

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7593
  • KIM JONG IL ORIGINAL BEATIFULL MAN WITH GLASSES
That is what the always do, they come up with some stupid shit and when you debunk it they dont even try to answer but comes up with som new stupid theory

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941

TheGrinch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5029
Cloud Seeing = Weather Modification = Geoengineering = Chemtrails


all exactly the same.. call it whatever you want..


they are spraying chemicals into the atmosphere.... I for one don't like breathing this crap without my consent

Ropo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2895
Cloud Seeing = Weather Modification = Geoengineering = Chemtrails


all exactly the same.. call it whatever you want..


they are spraying chemicals into the atmosphere.... I for one don't like breathing this crap without my consent

And as I said:

"Bullshit for idiots and incredible stupid people, and it has proven to be that lot better, than you foil hat idiots can prove otherwise. Let me give you some point's to explain:

1. those trails could be seen in all kind of aero planes, military, civilian, air force one etc. in every fucking country from the darkest Africa to the peak of civilizations in Europe, but no one has ever seen even one container of that poison? How this is possible?

2. Those trails could be seen even race cars, like F1 cars, if air humidity is correct for that phenomena. Are they spreading that poison also?

3. To get fog so thick that it could be seen as white clouds, it need to have 0.6 liter liquid per cubic meter. Those trails are at least three times as wide as the engine of the passenger plane, which is 3.5 meters in diameter, so those vapor trails are at least 10 meters in diameter. It makes 78.5 m³ per meter of vapor trail, which means 47 liter per meter, 47 tons per kilometer and so on PER ENGINE. That is a lot of liquid for four engine plane, just for kilometer of trail. Coast to coast flight is something like 3800 - 4000 kilometers, so you need like 178,6 million tons of liquid per engine. Where and how they carry that load?

4. Next thing is to start back pedaling and claim that trails are indeed water from air, but they add poisons with little tiny pipette as they fly. Please study what are half times of those claimed poisons, when you blend them in millions tons of water, and spread them in the air? Or do you mean that this is some kind of homeopathic conspiracy  Grin

What you idiots ignore, because you truly are idiots, is laws of physics. Instead of ignoring them, you should study them, because they are number one reason why your conspiracies doesn't work. You try to overrule the laws of physics, and that you simply can't do, because those laws are absolute fact and they rule everything which happens on this universe. It is a fact that there is plenty of chemicals on air, but instead of stupid conspiracies, the reason is the factories, traffic, aerosols and all that crap which gets airborne because of people living, consuming and working in different ways.

What chemicals are in petrol which planes use? You, fucking idiot don't know even that. Aviation fuels consist of blends of over a thousand chemicals, primarily Hydrocarbons (paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics) as well as additives such as antioxidants and metal deactivators, and impurities. Principal components include n-octane and isooctane. Over a thousand chemicals, which they don't name because you are too dumb to ask. Now fuck off, you imbecile, go to smell some kerosene..  "

So here we are again, just where we started, so let's see the facts?

1. You haven't been able to prove even single claim of your with any kind of evidence
2. You haven't been able to answer even the simplest questions
3. All what has been proved, is that your theory is complete bullshit

It is utterly stupid try to add these complete different things to be one and same thing after you fucking idiots have claim that every fucking vapor trail is chemtrail and part of some kind of sinister conspiracy. Only thing which you have been able to prove is that you are ignorant fucking moron, whose brains fit in the tea spoon.  ;D