No. You claimed that the treasury would have to print money in order to reimburse FDIC-insured deposits, which is false.
Then you claimed that the emergency lending had to do with the FDIC-insured deposits, which is false too.
Anyone here with half a brain knows there's no way Mr Anabolic and I could possibly be the same person. Besides, I already told you that I own BTC and ETH. I'm just not a member of your BTC cult.
Here is what I said:
"Bank deposits are insured for money (up to 250K), OF WHICH THE TREASURY CAN INFINITELY PRINT....
In other words, infinitely devalue.
Bitcoin is our protection against that..."
And what I said is of course 100% right.
As fort he emergency lending from the Treasury, if not made, the FDIC would not have sufficient funds even to cover SBV, let alone hundreds of other at risk banks.
I believe you, that you are not Mr Anabolic. Its just your obstinate style of posting and is eerily similar to his. All food though and through this discussion we educate each other, and others not to mention providing some entertainment to fellow Getbiggers with an interest in finance.
Noted that you own some BTC. Good to hear. Our interests are aligned there.