I read it, its not very good at all.
Which parts do you think are good? what assertions do you think have strong backing?
Elaborate. I am not sure you actually read it.
I see. So you read it, lied about its contents, and want me to disprove something you completely fabricated. No.
Anyone who actually reads the article can see that you are just outright lying. It's fine if you disagree with the analysis, but just making stuff and asking me to refute your fabrications is comically inappropriate.
Instead of being a troll, why don't you address the specific points made in the commentary and explain why you think they are wrong?
