Creepy Porn Lawyer

[chaos]

 

We should all agree that because WE know the FBI is charged with doing background investigations on Supreme court nominees, that after the investigation "closes" if new info comes to light, it only stands to reason that an FBI investigation into the claims should be warranted. Especially if 3 people are claiming an issue. What is the harm? Whats the hurry? Facts should matter

Facts, not 36 year old unfounded accusations.
Will there be an FBI investigation into the guy that dragged his old lady off the bad and assaulted her?
Will there be an FBI investigation into Cory Booker who openly admitted to sexually assaulting a girl?

[Kwon3]

Yup, and he touched her private areas. Brett is not alleged to have done anything but lie on top of her for a few seconds before he got off, which didn't even happen anyhow, but still - not even comparable.

[Agnostic007]

Yup, and he touched her private areas. Brett is not alleged to have done anything but lie on top of her for a few seconds before he got off, which didn't even happen anyhow, but still - not even comparable.

if you forget about the trying to disrobe her, put his hand over her mouth so she couldn't call for help,  I guess you are right

[Kwon3]

if you forget about the trying to disrobe her, put his hand over her mouth so she couldn't call for help,  I guess you are right

if you forget about the fact that those are unfounded as-yet uncorroborated allegations and the Booker article was his own confession to those despicable acts, I guess you are right

[chaos]

if you forget about the trying to disrobe her, put his hand over her mouth so she couldn't call for help,  I guess you are right

You state that as if it's fact, what proof did you see that the rest of us normal people missed?

[mazrim]

If agnostic gets accused of sexual assault with no verification, those supposedly being there all denying it, etc. I would take the side of the accuser for sure. I would just point to his posts as evidence. Definitely plausible.

[Agnostic007]

if you forget about the fact that those are unfounded as-yet uncorroborated allegations and the Booker article was his own confession to those despicable acts, I guess you are right

I'm merely pointing out your description is minimizing. "all he did was lie on top of her for a few seconds before getting off" completely ignores the alleged pushed her into the room, turned up the music, got on top of her, tried to take her clothes off, and put his hand over her mouth when she screamed... but yeah.. all  he did was allegedly lie on top of her for a few seconds. 

[Kwon3]

If agnostic gets accused of sexual assault with no verification, those supposedly being there all denying it, etc. I would take the side of the accuser for sure. I would just point to his posts as evidence. Definitely plausible.

don't worry, he has friends who are detectives in Texas and they'll be character references for him
oh wait, that doesn't work anymore when some anonymous nobody accuses you of something you can't disprove
 

I'm merely pointing out your description is minimizing. "all he did was lie on top of her for a few seconds before getting off" completely ignores the alleged pushed her into the room, turned up the music, got on top of her, tried to take her clothes off, and put his hand over her mouth when she screamed... but yeah.. all  he did was allegedly lie on top of her for a few seconds. 

That's right, I am minimizing it. You know why? Because rape and sexual assault are one thing, and grinding on a girl is another. By equating both, or almost, this woman just made a mockery of every legitimate sex crime victim in the world. You don't see that? Princess L does, and if anyone has the right to post about women and how they feel in this forum, she certainly should get first crack at it since the rest of us have testicles.

[loco]

3rd Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes

Julie Swetnick, one of the women who has publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application.

Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh's nomination for the nation's highest court.

Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/3rd-kavanaugh-accuser-history-legal-disputes-100137653.html

[Straw Man]

I'm merely pointing out your description is minimizing. "all he did was lie on top of her for a few seconds before getting off" completely ignores the alleged pushed her into the room, turned up the music, got on top of her, tried to take her clothes off, and put his hand over her mouth when she screamed... but yeah.. all  he did was allegedly lie on top of her for a few seconds.  

if that's "all he did" to Ford then that confirms he lied under oath since he say the encounter/incident, whatever you want to call it, never happened

Lying is something it appears he's done multiple times throughout the confirmation hearing

that alone should be disqualifying

his Trumpian rant on Thursday is also disqualifying and if he gets on the court he'll be correctly viewed as a partisan hack for the rest of his life

[chaos]

if that's "all he did" to Ford then that confirms he lied under oath since he say the encounter/incident, whatever you want to call it, never happened

Lying is something it appears he's done multiple times throughout the confirmation hearing

that alone should be disqualifying

his Trumpian rant on Thursday is also disqualifying and if he gets on the court he'll be correctly viewed as a partisan hack for the rest of his life

What a bunch of bullshit based on unproven accusations and built into assumptions by a bunch of anti Trump, anti American, liars.

[Straw Man]

What a bunch of bullshit based on unproven accusations and built into assumptions by a bunch of anti Trump, anti American, liars.

what the problem

since when do Trumptards care if someone lies

btw - Anti-Trump and Anti-American are mutually exclusive

[chaos]

what the problem

since when do Trumptards care if someone lies

btw - Anti-Trump and Anti-American are mutually exclusive

And you suddenly don't care when someone lies. Why? Because it fits your anti-Trump, anti-American agenda.

[Primemuscle]

if that's "all he did" to Ford then that confirms he lied under oath since he say the encounter/incident, whatever you want to call it, never happened

Lying is something it appears he's done multiple times throughout the confirmation hearing

that alone should be disqualifying

his Trumpian rant on Thursday is also disqualifying and if he gets on the court he'll be correctly viewed as a partisan hack for the rest of his life

-Just read an article which recounted all the inconsistencies in Kavanaugh's testimony last Thursday. Between this and his erratic and angry demeanor, he may have done himself in. 

[chaos]

-Just read an article which recounted all the inconsistencies in Kavanaugh's testimony last Thursday. Between this and his erratic and angry demeanor, he may have done himself in. 

No

[Coach is Back!]

-Just read an article which recounted all the inconsistencies in Kavanaugh's testimony last Thursday. Between this and his erratic and angry demeanor, he may have done himself in. 

Read up, sunshine

https://twitter.com/jacobawohl/status/1046599193312161793?s=21

[Dos Equis]

-Just read an article which recounted all the inconsistencies in Kavanaugh's testimony last Thursday. Between this and his erratic and angry demeanor, he may have done himself in. 

No.

[Primemuscle]

Read up, sunshine

https://twitter.com/jacobawohl/status/1046599193312161793?s=21

There's quite a difference between there being not enough evidence to prosecute and being completely exonerated. Jacob Wohl's tweet ridiculous headline neglects to mention this. Another thing, Kavanaugh has not been charged with a crime is even if he did what Ford claims, he wouldn't be charged because Maryland's statute of limitations on such matters is 5 years.

Unfortunately for Kavanaugh, he will never be completely exonerated in the court of public opinion.

Something you may not know about Jacob Wohl is that his 15 minutes of whatever are over. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jacob-wohl-teenage-hedge-fund-202540921.html

Jacob Wohl, the 19-year-old “Wohl Of Wall Street” hedge fund manager, faces a pending action by the Arizona Securities Commission that accuses Wohl’s companies of violating the state’s securities laws.

10 Things You Didn’t Know about Jacob Wohl https://moneyinc.com/jacob-wohl/

Jacob Wohl, Teen Hedge Funder Turned Pro-Trump Media Star, Was Accused of Cheating Clients
This 20-year-old Trump acolyte bills himself as a finance prodigy, but like his hero, he’s got a shady past. https://www.thedailybeast.com/jacob-wohl-teen-hedge-funder-turned-pro-trump-media-star-was-accused-of-cheating-clients

It's your turn to read up, ginger.  

[Primemuscle]

No.

No what? No I didn't just read that, no you won't read it or no, it can't be true.

[SOMEPARTS]

3rd Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes

Julie Swetnick, one of the women who has publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application.

Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh's nomination for the nation's highest court.

Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/3rd-kavanaugh-accuser-history-legal-disputes-100137653.html

She already destroyed most of her initial story on an NBC interview. Avenatti is headed back to the gutters.

[chaos]

She already destroyed most of her initial story on an NBC interview. Avenatti is headed back to the gutters.

He can take that big mouth, fake titted, washed up whore of a pornstar with him.

[Agnostic007]

He can take that big mouth, fake titted, washed up whore of a pornstar with him.

She is well past her prime and due another breast lift no doubt

[Agnostic007]

Something you learned to say from Donald Trump? No wonder he's your hero.

Did we just meet?? Donald Trump my hero? What are you smoking?

[Kwon3]

Did we just meet?? Donald Trump my hero? What are you smoking?

Told you he was fucked in the head. Now do you believe me?

Some people never learn. There's users here you don't address or take seriously. You spit on them, revile them, call them names, harass them, and dog them wherever you see them. He is one such person, and the proof is in the quote you posted.

[chaos]

Something you learned to say from Donald Trump? No wonder he's your hero.

Did we just meet?? Donald Trump my hero? What are you smoking?

Senility is no joke