Hierarchy of Male Status

[Skeletor]

I like how none of you complained about the placement of Nasser aka. the "beautiful man with glasses"   

Movie star good looks, spoke 7 languages, worked at a gas station.

[Matt]

Normie.Chads are top 5% for a reason, we have had a few, Prime Falcon,Groink, Grant Michaels, Scott markey, prime titus, all I can think of off the top of my head.We certainly never had a slayer.

I honestly feel with women that even though it is said that looks don't matter to them, that this is untrue.  For example, on Tinder, 78% of women are vying for the top 20% of males, exclusively.

I think it sort of works like this - women, in general, have a minimum expectation in mind in terms of looks.  If you meet that standard, you're fine.  As long as you don't mess it up in other ways.  Like for me, for example, expressing my cusp autism is fine.  INDULGING in autism is not cool.  It's like if you have OCD - if you try to keep it under control in social settings, it probably won't negatively impact you.  If you don't try to mind it, it may be more likely to negatively impact you.

I always felt if you were at that minimum looks standard, you could get most women, providing that you had nothing to severely mess it up [in my case, being a Neo-Nazi online, but even that I found didn't impact shorter-term relationships with women - I always figured it probably mattered more for long-term relationships and marriage, where women are going to be concerned about a man's status].

It's like height.  I range between 174- to 176-cm depending on the time of day.  So my lowest nighttime height is 5'8.5".

The thing is, I'm still taller than 90% of women, and those taller than me are taller than around 60% of men, and tend to be more likely to settle.  A woman who is 5'10", for example, is taller than around 2/3 of all men, and won't be as concerned about a man being an inch shorter than her as a woman who is 5'3" would be, for example.

So - I would always try to make it a point to just hit the minimums that I felt that women wanted.  I would wear a chunky heel [but not elevator shoes] in order to try to look 5'9.5" [call it 5'10"] because I felt that was juuuussst hitting that minimum that pretty much most women wanted in terms of height minimum.  When the shoes come off, I'd already be at my place with them.

So yeah - hitting certain minimum marks I found impressed women.  Looks [including height/teeth], having your own car, wearing decent enough clothes, good hygiene, etc.  Pay mind to these things, and I think a lot of men could up their odds with women.

Although I think just having money/resources is perhaps the biggest individual factor.

[Army of One]

I honestly feel with women that even though it is said that looks don't matter to them, that this is untrue.  For example, on Tinder, 78% of women are vying for the top 20% of males, exclusively.

I think it sort of works like this - women, in general, have a minimum expectation in mind in terms of looks.  If you meet that standard, you're fine.  As long as you don't mess it up in other ways.  Like for me, for example, expressing my cusp autism is fine.  INDULGING in autism is not cool.  It's like if you have OCD - if you try to keep it under control in social settings, it probably won't negatively impact you.  If you don't try to mind it, it may be more likely to negatively impact you.

I always felt if you were at that minimum looks standard, you could get most women, providing that you had nothing to severely mess it up [in my case, being a Neo-Nazi online, but even that I found didn't impact shorter-term relationships with women - I always figured it probably mattered more for long-term relationships and marriage, where women are going to be concerned about a man's status].

It's like height.  I range between 174- to 176-cm depending on the time of day.  So my lowest nighttime height is 5'8.5".

The thing is, I'm still taller than 90% of women, and those taller than me are taller than around 60% of men, and tend to be more likely to settle.  A woman who is 5'10", for example, is taller than around 2/3 of all men, and won't be as concerned about a man being an inch shorter than her as a woman who is 5'3" would be, for example.

So - I would always try to make it a point to just hit the minimums that I felt that women wanted.  I would wear a chunky heel [but not elevator shoes] in order to try to look 5'9.5" [call it 5'10"] because I felt that was juuuussst hitting that minimum that pretty much most women wanted in terms of height minimum.  When the shoes come off, I'd already be at my place with them.

So yeah - hitting certain minimum marks I found impressed women.  Looks [including height/teeth], having your own car, wearing decent enough clothes, good hygiene, etc.  Pay mind to these things, and I think a lot of men could up their odds with women.

Although I think just having money/resources is perhaps the biggest individual factor.

You feel that because it's true.It used to be a woman couldn't put so much emphasis on looks because she needed a provider to have any kind of life.Now women are reaching parity with men on wages.Throw in the smartphone where she can pick from hundreds of men she can date after coming home from her 70k a year job, then of course she will pick the better looking men.

Women are more sexually attractive than men on average from teens to 35 or so.Usually around 30 she will date long term or marry a guy she wouldn't have given a 2nd look to in her 20's, to lock down resources.But again this is even becoming less and less due to women earning more.Looks have always mattered to women, just like sex has always mattered, but they couldn't express it publically due to shaming.

[Roast Beef Pecs]

End of thread. Mods: please lock.

[OneMoreRep]

Every woman is different in terms of their preferences.

Universally speaking, most women can appreciate great facial features, perfect hair and a great body on a man (height + normal muscle mass with low body fat). The same women that can appreciate that will also fuck a man that is complete with those aforementioned features.

To keep a woman is a different story all together. One common denominator that will keep the vast majority of women with men that are ugly, fat and old is money and lots of it. The more money you have, the more women you'll get. Like that old saying, "He who chases after women will soon run out of money. He who chases after money will never run out of women."

Some women, depending on their life achievements, value men of great intelligence and find that incredibly attractive. An amazing mind can sometimes trump a lackluster body and an average bank account.

Also, as women age, their standards drop substantially if they are single and actively looking. Older women (>35yrs old) care less about a man having perfect looks and prefer a man with financial security (ie money, which equals power), a mature and intelligent mind and the kind of work drive that can potentially keep that woman at home relaxing and shopping with friends for leisure.

For those of you who are not that attractive, consider that every one of these so-called "slayers" lose their shine with age. What will keep them relevant will no longer be their looks with time, but instead will be their careers, societal influence, money and seductive skillset.

For instance, look at this before and after:





Assuming Pitt was not a movie star and was dirt poor, he would still land women, but not at the rate he once did when much younger.

You're best window to land and fuck tons of women is truly between the ages of 18-40. Past the age of 40, unless you're juicing religiously, dieting like the Olympia was next week, lifting every day of the week, treating your facial wrinkles with Botox, keeping a full head of hair and making sure you attain consistent diamond-cutting erections on demand, YOU will not be a "slayer" anymore.

Work on obtaining the best version of you and wo/men will follow.

"1"

[FitnessFrenzy]

I'll give you an idea of the true litmus test for a Chad.I think many here might have mistakenly classed a young PJ Braun or a 20yr old Derek Anthony as a Chad.But when you look at them, something feels off, like they are trying too hard, faking it.They are not people you are instinctively drawn to and want to follow.Chads don't have this problem,they have an alpha masculinity that leaves you with no doubt.

'Primemuscle mode off.'

Your post had Primemuscle-like elements, but for a true and authentic Primemuscle post feel, you need 30 more lines of text and a lot more creepy info. 

[chaos]

She's fat and old now , it's not worth it

[Army of One]

.

[Humble Narcissist]

Every woman is different in terms of their preferences.

Universally speaking, most women can appreciate great facial features, perfect hair and a great body on a man (height + normal muscle mass with low body fat). The same women that can appreciate that will also fuck a man that is complete with those aforementioned features.

To keep a woman is a different story all together. One common denominator that will keep the vast majority of women with men that are ugly, fat and old is money and lots of it. The more money you have, the more women you'll get. Like that old saying, "He who chases after women will soon run out of money. He who chases after money will never run out of women."

Some women, depending on their life achievements, value men of great intelligence and find that incredibly attractive. An amazing mind can sometimes trump a lackluster body and an average bank account.

Also, as women age, their standards drop substantially if they are single and actively looking. Older women (>35yrs old) care less about a man having perfect looks and prefer a man with financial security (ie money, which equals power), a mature and intelligent mind and the kind of work drive that can potentially keep that woman at home relaxing and shopping with friends for leisure.

For those of you who are not that attractive, consider that every one of these so-called "slayers" lose their shine with age. What will keep them relevant will no longer be their looks with time, but instead will be their careers, societal influence, money and seductive skillset.

For instance, look at this before and after:





Assuming Pitt was not a movie star and was dirt poor, he would still land women, but not at the rate he once did when much younger.

You're best window to land and fuck tons of women is truly between the ages of 18-40. Past the age of 40, unless you're juicing religiously, dieting like the Olympia was next week, lifting every day of the week, treating your facial wrinkles with Botox, keeping a full head of hair and making sure you attain consistent diamond-cutting erections on demand, YOU will not be a "slayer" anymore.

Work on obtaining the best version of you and wo/men will follow.

"1"

I agree with everything you said until the Brad Pitt part.  Pitt is still a very attractive man (no homo).  More attractive that 95% of the men his age (no homo again).

[Kwon]

Brad Pitt is more attractive now than in his 20s imo (No Homer)


Nothing beats Hendas hairy chest though (All Homer Simpsia)



Slayer here

Slayer here as well

[Army of One]

I agree with everything you said until the Brad Pitt part.  Pitt is still a very attractive man (no homo).  More attractive that 95% of the men his age (no homo again).

I think his point is that while Pitt is still an attractive man, he can't compete with an average Chad 23yr old on sex appeal alone, and Brad was arguably the best looking famous male ever in his prime.

[Humble Narcissist]

I think his point is that while Pitt is still an attractive man, he can't compete with an average Chad 23yr old on sex appeal alone, and Brad was arguably the best looking famous male ever in his prime.

True, on looks alone but how many 23 year old Chads have his bankroll?  If he didn't have 37 kids with Jolie he'd really be a hot commodity.

[Kwon]

True, on looks alone but how many 23 year old Chads have his bankroll?  If he didn't have 37 kids with Jolie he'd really be a hot commodity.

The years with Jolie took it's toll as well.


He'd look younger if he never had married Jolie and got all those 39½ kids



Grip of Skeletor

[FitnessFrenzy]

Brad Pitt's new girlfriend 

[Bevo]

For a slayer like Brad Pitt he didn’t even date grade A females. Paltrow and Jolie, give me a break, Aniston is a basic white chick in her prime

[OneMoreRep]

True, on looks alone but how many 23 year old Chads have his bankroll?  If he didn't have 37 kids with Jolie he'd really be a hot commodity.

I was looking at Pitt for his looks alone. In other words, forget his fame, money and notoriety as a playboy. Instead, imagine your next door neighbor having his amazing genetics for facial features. The same Pitt'esque neighbor will crush all women in his prime, but once he crosses his 50's like Pitt now has, while still very attractive, he won't crush 20-something yr old women (assuming he was a nobody) with the same relative ease he once had. The young women will look at him as an attractive older man, but they won't melt at his feet without him putting a good level of effort into it.

For instance, Tom Skerritt (who is 86yrs old now) was a damn stud in the film Top Gun, which came out in 1986 when Tom was 52.



Now, if he and prime Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer were at a bar during the exact same year (assuming neither of the three had any level of fame or money), I think you can rest assured that Cruise & Kilmer would take all the 20-something year old's home.





The difficulty with these examples is that these are Hollywood stars that have all the money and resources in the world. They can burn money away on year-round trainers, dietitians and the best steroids money can buy with the right level of medical supervision. That said, I think you get the idea I am trying to convey. With time, every slayer becomes an older and more "regular" looking older man. Young women that are superficial and walk around looking like 10s and making money off of schmoes on Instagram like guys that are young as well and with as close-to-perfect looks as well. The great denominator that still evens out the odds is money. Money will make a 3-inch PJenis look like a 9-inch anaconda. It will make Tom Prince look like Tom Cruise.

"1"

[Roast Beef Pecs]

I was looking at Pitt for his looks alone. In other words, forget his fame, money and notoriety as a playboy. Instead, imagine your next door neighbor having his amazing genetics for facial features. The same Pitt'esque neighbor will crush all women in his prime, but once he crosses his 50's like Pitt now has, while still very attractive, he won't crush 20-something yr old women (assuming he was a nobody) with the same relative ease he once had. The young women will look at him as an attractive older man, but they won't melt at his feet without him putting a good level of effort into it.

For instance, Tom Skerritt (who is 86yrs old now) was a damn stud in the film Top Gun, which came out in 1986 when Tom was 52.



Now, if he and prime Tom Cruise and Val Kilmer were at a bar during the exact same year (assuming neither of the three had any level of fame or money), I think you can rest assured that Cruise & Kilmer would take all the 20-something year old's home.





The difficulty with these examples is that these are Hollywood stars that have all the money and resources in the world. They can burn money away on year-round trainer, dietitians and the best steroids money can buy with the right level of medical supervision. That said, I think you get the idea I am trying to convey.

"1"

There goes your theory

[OneMoreRep]

There goes your theory

I get you like Wahlberg a lot, but his face is old and tired looking. He is still a good looking man, but nowhere near as good looking as even Brad Pitt or George Clooney today. Not even in the same neighborhood. Yes, when Wahlberg gets on the juice and works with his trainer, he is able to achieve great gains, but father time has been cumming on his face a lot. Not to mention that he is about 5'8 and many reports suggest more like 5'6. Kind of a turn off for women of most ages, unless you count shorter women (5'2 and shorter). Again, this is just based on looks alone, not his fame or money.

"1"

[Roast Beef Pecs]

I get you like Wahlberg a lot, but his face is old and tired looking. He is still a good looking man, but nowhere near as good looking as even Brad Pitt or George Clooney today. Not even in the same neighborhood. Yes, when Wahlberg gets on the juice and works with his trainer, he is able to achieve great gains, but father time has been cumming on his face a lot. Not to mention that he is about 5'8 and many reports suggest more like 5'6. Kind of a turn off for women of most ages, unless you count shorter women (5'2 and shorter). Again, this is just based on looks alone, not his fame or money.

"1"

1. He is always been natural

2. He has been described by many women as the hottest man alive, recently.

3. He is 5'9"

[Kwon]

1. He is always been natural

2. He has been described by many women as the hottest man alive, recently.

3. He is 5'9"

5'6"

[OneMoreRep]

1. He is always been natural

Agreed. Nothing synthetic about him.

2. He has been described by many women as the hottest man alive, recently.

So was this turd below (John Legend).

3. He is 5'9"

Everywhere it says 5'8, but maybe he is 5'9, who knows..



"1"

[Hulkotron]

How tall is Rock?

[robcguns]

How tall is Rock?

6’2.5”

[joswift]

he looks like a baby with a beard...

[Humble Narcissist]

The years with Jolie took it's toll as well.


He'd look younger if he never had married Jolie and got all those 39½ kids



Grip of Skeletor

Chain smoking cigarettes, weed and heavy drinking didn't help his skin at all either.  Probably a shit ton of stress being married to psycho Skeletor and her 47 3/4  kids.  She divorced him because he yelled at one of them on the plane.