Author Topic: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?  (Read 15141 times)

cqfd

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • cylindrical waists suck!
pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« on: April 20, 2006, 04:52:47 PM »
There was a thread a few weeks ago where somebody said that there could be a relation between the prettiness of the face and the aesthetics of the body.

Usually people with a very aesthetic body don't have an ugly face.
Think tito raymond, reeves, paris, betancourt.

Are there examples of (fit and with some muscle on them) pple with a very below average face and a very aesthetic body or the opposite?

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2006, 06:13:07 PM »
Gunter doesnt have all that good aestestics
P

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19673
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2006, 06:19:09 PM »
No such correlation exists.  First of all, what one person considers a pretty or attractive face is not uniform.  We were just talking about that in thread on Gustavo Baddell; some say he is ugly, others say he is among the most handsome guys out there.

From what I’ve gathered, most people on here think Pavol is ugly (I differ), but most agree his body is nearly flawless aesthetically.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2006, 06:19:22 PM »
I agree. All girls look my puffy cheeks so that and my rugged beautefully shaped face with awesome features makes my body just as great.  :o
just push some weight!

body88

  • Guest
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2006, 06:22:30 PM »
I agree. All girls look my puffy cheeks so that and my rugged beautefully shaped face with awesome features makes my body just as great.  :o

Alexx I gotta give you credit.... One of the longest running most convincing gimmicks ever!

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2006, 06:23:03 PM »
Gunter doesnt have all that good aestestics

Yes he does. His physique is often compared to Arnold.
"Shut the F up and train"

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2006, 06:25:28 PM »
Pavol is just old. He used to be on Tiger Beat.
"Shut the F up and train"

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #7 on: April 20, 2006, 06:27:21 PM »
Alexx I gotta give you credit.... One of the longest running most convincing gimmicks ever!

I am not a gimmik. Ask CT or Stavios or go look at my pics in the member's section. All the pros wish they where me.  I'm gorgeous! :-*
just push some weight!

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #8 on: April 20, 2006, 06:28:10 PM »
Don't pull the relativistic stuff.  Let's consider attractiveness based on averages of opinion.  I guarantee you that Bob Paris or Gunter Schlierkamp or Richard Jones would be polled as being far better looking than Branch Warren.  Although specific individuals disagree, on the whole that would be the case.

I'm willing to give $100 to Ron VIA paypal if you wish to make this bet.

Yes, some may disagree but this post is about what the overall averages would be.

Pavol is an example which differs from our theory.

  Why are you looking at men's faces? :-\ Are you gay?  :-X

Dingleberry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2408
  • My nuts, your chin, any questions?
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2006, 06:30:13 PM »
I don't think there's any correlation between a pretty face and nice body, but without a doubt there is a correlation between breasts and glutes. The best asses I've ever seen are on women with small breasts, and the flattest asses have been on women with gigantic breasts. I'm saying on a genetic level, and it has nothing to do with working out.
tiny-tit bounty hunter

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19673
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2006, 06:31:18 PM »
  Why are you looking at men's faces? :-\ Are you gay?  :-X

 :-X

Gunter, aesthetic? Hell no!  >:(

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2006, 06:31:58 PM »
No sir.

I believe on the Kinsey scale only 1 in 20 people are completely hetero.  I find that hard to believe.

   Please don't "gay" me up ;D

body88

  • Guest
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2006, 06:33:35 PM »
I don't think there's any correlation between a pretty face and nice body, but without a doubt there is a correlation between breasts and glutes. The best asses I've ever seen are on women with small breasts, and the flattest asses have been on women with gigantic breasts. I'm saying on a genetic level, and it has nothing to do with working out.

Of course the huge tits equate  fat storage in the tits and not the ass....vice versa

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2006, 06:35:47 PM »
:-X

Gunter, aesthetic? Hell no!  >:(

That's his worst pose and everyone knows it. Show him doing a front double bicep or a side chest.
"Shut the F up and train"

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32167
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2006, 06:43:41 PM »
That's his worst pose and everyone knows it. Show him doing a front double bicep or a side chest.
true that....

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2006, 06:45:43 PM »


"Shut the F up and train"

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #16 on: April 20, 2006, 06:49:32 PM »
There was a thread a few weeks ago where somebody said that there could be a relation between the prettiness of the face and the aesthetics of the body.

Usually people with a very aesthetic body don't have an ugly face.
Think tito raymond, reeves, paris, betancourt.

Are there examples of (fit and with some muscle on them) pple with a very below average face and a very aesthetic body or the opposite?

Maybe they just get more credit for their physiques with a good looking face.  The whole appreance kind of thing.  I don't know that they are tied together.  Cerntainly not with women.  There are a lot of ugly heads on perfect bodies.

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32167
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #17 on: April 20, 2006, 06:53:56 PM »
How are they selling hardcore bbing with gunter or any bber in high cut jean short's :-*wtf.

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #18 on: April 20, 2006, 06:54:32 PM »
wouldn't most women agree that arnold had a hideous face...well most say he had a hideous body too.

i think it comes down to conditioning...most of these "non aesthetic" guys are on whatever drug causes palumboism that it distorts their faces too... most of the "more aesthetic", usually smaller dudes aren't doing the drugs...or haven't been as long around to have the years of bodily/drug abuse show on their faces.
Deep Tissue Massage

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83359
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #19 on: April 20, 2006, 06:55:24 PM »
This is Matt's whacked out theory , facial beauty is way to subjective and take Thierry Pastel I don't consider him a great looking guy but his physique is OUTSTANDING aesthetics wise , the same can be said about Serge Nubret , John Knattyshack , etc all of these guys are known for great aesthetics but not so much great looks .

Oliver Klaushof

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3525
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #20 on: April 20, 2006, 06:56:11 PM »
wouldn't most women agree that arnold had a hideous face...well most say he had a hideous body too.


Arnold was a "ladies man"  - no I think he has a chisled classical look. He's no Lou Ferrigno.
"Shut the F up and train"

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32167
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #21 on: April 20, 2006, 06:56:42 PM »
wouldn't most women agree that arnold had a hideous face...well most say he had a hideous body too.

i think it comes down to conditioning...most of these "non aesthetic" guys are on whatever drug causes palumboism that it distorts their faces too... most of the "more aesthetic", usually smaller dudes aren't doing the drugs...or haven't been as long around to have the years of bodily/drug abuse show on their faces.
don't be too sure of that.

Dingleberry

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2408
  • My nuts, your chin, any questions?
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #22 on: April 20, 2006, 06:56:44 PM »
Of course the huge tits equate  fat storage in the tits and not the ass....vice versa

Yeah, but it's more than that, it's like they have a different muscle structure in their glutes.
tiny-tit bounty hunter

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #23 on: April 20, 2006, 06:58:19 PM »
Arnold was a "ladies man"  - no I think he has a chisled classical look. He's no Lou Ferrigno.

by ladies man you mean molester right? in those videos/photos of him surrounded by women it's either cuz they're : paid to be there....or there for his money.

come on dude, look at this mug...

Deep Tissue Massage

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: pretty face= good potential for an aesthetic body?
« Reply #24 on: April 20, 2006, 06:59:06 PM »
don't be too sure of that.

what?

i said "i think"...not "it is...."

but anyways, why do you say that?
Deep Tissue Massage