Author Topic: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls  (Read 1559 times)

Darren Avey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8118
Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« on: March 04, 2021, 10:31:33 AM »
Brutal 13 inch ginger freckle pipes of peace


OlympiaGym

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2126
  • they/them/their
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2021, 11:01:16 AM »
He looks to be in pretty good shape to me, particularly given his height.

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2021, 11:15:47 AM »
He looks to be in pretty good shape to me, particularly given his height.

Good point. For 6'10", I suspect he would be massive in person.

SOMEPARTS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16628
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2021, 11:18:25 AM »
Yeah, tiny....probably 6'7" and 280 there.   ::)

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2021, 11:21:02 AM »
Yeah, tiny....probably 6'7" and 280 there.   ::)

 ;D

The only thing I call a dude with nearly a foot in height on me [possibly more], and nearly 100-lb on me [possibly more] is "Sir".

robcguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20124
  • Founder of the proud straight white male movement
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2021, 12:05:45 PM »
He’s not a small guy but for his height yes his arms look small.

fredrollon

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 974
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2021, 12:15:51 PM »
For some perspective :

WoogsRaven

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 676
  • Whisper sumthin nice and I'll make ya scream twice
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #7 on: March 04, 2021, 12:40:11 PM »
Undertaker was a legit 6'8" tall at his peak. Probably closer to 6'6" after multiple back surgeries.

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17716
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2021, 12:47:06 PM »
He never liked to lift weights, but even now he's decently strong, and more importantly has good mobility. Thiswas a few years ago -

.

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 51901
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2021, 12:53:23 PM »
Undertaker was HUGE









Q

Matt

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16693
  • YouTube FitnessByMatt
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2021, 12:59:42 PM »
Undertaker was a legit 6'8" tall at his peak. Probably closer to 6'6" after multiple back surgeries.

Wrestling is unforgiving.

Giant of a man. Hard to build huge biceps with arms that long.

Walter Sobchak

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13907
  • HANKINS IS A FUCKING LIAR & QUITTER
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2021, 01:07:29 PM »
Wrestling is unforgiving.

Giant of a man. Hard to build huge biceps with arms that long.

Exactly the opposite of you.

Yet you have arms and legs like Popeye’s girlfriend Olive Oyl.

Kwon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 51901
  • PRONOUNS: Ze/Zir
Re: Young Undertaker obviously didnt believe in bicep curls
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2021, 01:09:11 PM »
Wrestling is unforgiving.

Giant of a man. Hard to build huge biceps with arms that long.

True.

Still, your arms are long compared to your height and you managed to build them to an impressive size.
Q