Author Topic: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?  (Read 9710 times)

triple_pickle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1796
  • Pull Hard, Move Fast
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #25 on: April 22, 2006, 07:09:50 PM »
"freak" is what i aspire to be

from what i've seen, you're already a freak

triple_pickle

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1796
  • Pull Hard, Move Fast
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #26 on: April 22, 2006, 07:10:34 PM »
I prefer that they look like Alexxx, a nearly flawless combination of size and aesthetics. :o

hi alex

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #27 on: April 22, 2006, 07:11:43 PM »

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #28 on: April 23, 2006, 12:11:44 PM »
  I'm not Alexxx.

but you wish you were 8)
Flower Boy Ran Away

freeagain

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2004
  • Getbig!
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #29 on: April 23, 2006, 12:18:43 PM »

i would like to look like frank zane  .. that kinda physique is pure 'pussy-magnet' !

the freaks just bring redicule on themselves from public at large and are downright anti-social.


haider

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11978
  • Team Batman Squats
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #30 on: April 23, 2006, 12:34:19 PM »
Shawn Ray over Frank any day!  :o
follow the arrows

¤·U4Ick·¤

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #31 on: April 23, 2006, 12:39:33 PM »
Inquiry for a Collegiate Project: I would like to preface this post by saying I apologize for hijacking this thread but I do have a limited time constraint and need input A.S.A.P.

             Dear Getbigger’s,
                                    I was hoping that some of you would be able to help me out; I have a project due for college pretty soon. We got to choose the subject matter and topic at hand I chose to detail the specific weight training regimen(s) of a certain group of characters. Specifically, I need to know what you think the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles would dead-lift, squat, and bench. I need to know what each specific character would be capable of as well. I’m sure that Michaelangelo does not put up the same poundage’s as his diet is rather haphazard while someone like Leonardo is more disciplined.   I myself do not lift weights and only bench 250lbs for 20 reps. (a friend of mine as a bench in his basement and I thought I would try it out and see how it went.) I hope I get some serious responses on a rather odd topic, this is going to be a very specific project on the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle’s and your input is very important to me and my grades.

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #32 on: April 23, 2006, 01:42:05 PM »
the ones you're calling pretty were the freaks of their day.

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #33 on: April 23, 2006, 01:44:40 PM »
Inquiry for a Collegiate Project: I would like to preface this post by saying I apologize for hijacking this thread but I do have a limited time constraint and need input A.S.A.P.

             Dear Getbigger’s,
                                    I was hoping that some of you would be able to help me out; I have a project due for college pretty soon. We got to choose the subject matter and topic at hand I chose to detail the specific weight training regimen(s) of a certain group of characters. Specifically, I need to know what you think the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles would dead-lift, squat, and bench. I need to know what each specific character would be capable of as well. I’m sure that Michaelangelo does not put up the same poundage’s as his diet is rather haphazard while someone like Leonardo is more disciplined.   I myself do not lift weights and only bench 250lbs for 20 reps. (a friend of mine as a bench in his basement and I thought I would try it out and see how it went.) I hope I get some serious responses on a rather odd topic, this is going to be a very specific project on the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtle’s and your input is very important to me and my grades.

hahahaha, so you don't lift weights but you have a one rep max of around 385 lbs. on the bench press huh? hahahahaha. ::)
Jaejonna rows 125!!

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #34 on: April 23, 2006, 02:02:40 PM »
"pretty" is not a good word for the comparison.

Balanced/aesthetic/proportional/flowing.....

The best guys are those who have the best overall appearance of mass and muscularity plus the above qualities.  Flex is brought up a lot here.....and for damn good reason.  Kevin Levrone as well. 

MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #35 on: April 23, 2006, 02:14:50 PM »
"pretty" is not a good word for the comparison.

Balanced/aesthetic/proportional/flowing.....

proportional and balanced are functions of relation, not pure size. you can have a 6' 200 pound bodybuilder with poor balance and proportion. likewise, someone can be 300 pounds and be in perfect proportion. ronnie coleman isn't "pretty" by any means but even at 300 pounds on stage is in great proportion except for his calves.

flowing is a purely subjective word. what you call flowing i might not. for example, frank zane just looks small to me. i don't see anything appealing about him at all, certainly nothing that ever deserved to be called mr olympia.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #36 on: April 23, 2006, 02:32:28 PM »
proportional and balanced are functions of relation, not pure size. you can have a 6' 200 pound bodybuilder with poor balance and proportion. likewise, someone can be 300 pounds and be in perfect proportion. ronnie coleman isn't "pretty" by any means but even at 300 pounds on stage is in great proportion except for his calves.

flowing is a purely subjective word. what you call flowing i might not. for example, frank zane just looks small to me. i don't see anything appealing about him at all, certainly nothing that ever deserved to be called mr olympia.

I laughed out loud when I read is in great proportion with the exception of his calves , nonsense , he has always had poor balance & proportion , his calves are undersized & and quads oversided , his midsection at anything about 250lbs is a serious problem , his biceps & triceps are way to big for his forearms , his ass sticks out from the front and his as big as a Buick , when he was about 250lbs it tied together a litter better but its always been medicore , having strong bodyparts can be a weakness because it makes the weaker ones standout even more.

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #37 on: April 23, 2006, 03:43:38 PM »
zane looks awesome in those pics, put him in any show today and id back him to win
P

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83360
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #38 on: April 23, 2006, 04:42:16 PM »
Give me a list of names of pros with greater waist-to-chest and waist-to-shoulder ratios then.

On an absolute scale his waist is quite large but he has more than enough upper body mass to create a very dramatic taper relative to his waist size.

Coleman has a good taper when veiwed directly dead on and when his abs are held firmly , which for him is rare , he may still have a excellent taper but it doesn't help in the aesthetics dept , he can't effectively do twisting shots , when his twists his torso his gut becomes evident , when he is relaxed which he is notorious for onstage , his obliques stick out and his gut protrudes and it takes away from his entire physique

They say that whenever a person looks at the body their eyes automatically fall on the midsection , hits the center of the whole body and the hallmark of every great champion has been a small , tight , flat waist , the title of Mr Olympia is the zeinth of bodybuilding perfection , it means you're litteraly the best of the best and it takes away from the title when the best bodybuilder on the planet looks pregnant , this is one of the biggest ( no pun ) problems with the sport , and the shame of it is , Ronnie used to have a miniscule waist , and Yates in 92 at 242lbs had a tight small waist , now the top 3 at this past Olympia all had nice guts going on , the 3 best bodybuilders on the planet all look women in thier 3rd trimester , its really a shame that the newer guys to the sport accept this as part & parcel as being a big bodybuilder and being part of the sport , like many have said the sport is going backwards not forwards.

p.s. this pic is from the 2005 Olympia , it shows that when not held firmly in place Ronnie's gut is wide & protrudes , and compared to 1998 its a far cry from what it used to be

nzmusclemonster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13693
  • Serenity Now!
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #39 on: April 23, 2006, 04:58:08 PM »
jay is so over rated! on the day of the show ronnie is the father, jay is his child  ;)
P

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #40 on: April 24, 2006, 07:58:02 AM »
but you wish you were 8)

    I don't want to be him any more than I want to be Jesus Christ. I just admire them both a great deal.

wishtobbigger

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: You prefer the FREAKS or the PRETTY physiques?
« Reply #41 on: April 24, 2006, 08:16:22 AM »
how can you call a body builder, a serious one pretty? they have either freaky amounts of muscle that over bear the non freaky parts or they are symmetrical. there is no pretty there may be more desireable or attainable but never pretty. a female may be pretty but a guy come on what people want is a good clean cut look. they want size and  definition in a perfect balance.
personally i love the freaks and the symmetrical guys to look like them is unattainable for myself but i love to see what some good hard work can produce. and on a side rant who cares if they use roids or don't?  we want size and all that if they wanna use it and are happy with the results let them. as long as they are healthy let them be, and enough with the paper thin skin i just wanna see the mass and the cuts why hurt yourself so much only to be paper thin it looks unreal. and as a side note, i have great respect for these guys and what they do i being in the marines put my body through hell and can only imagine what these guys would have to do to get the look they have
BKS: the peoples champion