Total Members Voted: 38
Both of them wouldn't be featured on the cover of GQ.
You look healthy. Brian has to be worried about palumboism setting in.
Josh, I voted for you only because you are the only one I have seen naked up close.
My face hasn`t aged in 9 years,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,seriously.
Bhanks looks about 37,38 and Avesher maybe 50,51.
who looks younger
It's hard to say
Typical British dork
Haha that is how loads of them look ower here[/quoteAnd what's with you guys wearing t-shirts in 40 degree weather? I was thinking maybe you're trying to show of the guns, but from what I've seen from you guys there are no guns to be shown.
Quote from: Henda on November 13, 2021, 12:04:46 AMHaha that is how loads of them look ower here[/quoteAnd what's with you guys wearing t-shirts in 40 degree weather? I was thinking maybe you're trying to show of the guns, but from what I've seen from you guys there are no guns to be shown.Haha That’s usually a northern thing the southerners historically mocked us for our reluctance to wearing coats even in winter I’m guilty of same thing don’t think I’ve ever wore anything other than a tshirt when going out on drink
Haha That’s usually a northern thing the southerners historically mocked us for our reluctance to wearing coats even in winter I’m guilty of same thing don’t think I’ve ever wore anything other than a tshirt when going out on drink
Bhank is really only 43?? Holy shit.... This guy is 54, just for comparison
Heavy androgens really age you facially. Test and tren are the worst offenders.
Test? Really?