Sure, yeah: general efficacy, individual and societal risk-benefit, cost, extent to which goals have been achieved, etc. You can read the minutes of previous JCVI meetings on the UK Gov website and it's probably quite interesting for those following this issue.
https://app.box.com/s/iddfb4ppwkmtjusir2tc/file/1080309260142
I'm just not fully understanding Booty's views regarding the vaccines being 'bio-weapons' and part of a 'genocide' programme. Why would the UK and US governments be supposedly trying to stop vaccinations quietly now due to adverse effects if that were the case?
I'm not in on the Intentional Death model but I can see how people might conclude that authorities are malevolent. Additionally, the Anti movement is becoming quite a little industry itself. People of the Anti persuasion are every bit as prone to uncritically accept supporting evidence as jabbies are when they point to what are essentially pharma's result driven studies.
I prefer the Greedy Idiots, Cowarly Minions, Broken System model with a liberal garnish of All Problems Are Emergencies So Here's Your Orders.
The link is kaput but it doesn't matter. I acknowledge that I'm sufficiently skeptical of anything put forward for public consumption that I'm likely to dismiss it as scripted. Not everything is a lie but a healthy suspicion is more rational than naive credulity when interpreting information from verifiably untrustworthy sources.
It seems pointless to debate the term we should apply to the new policy. Ban, rollback, reduction, targeted supply, optimized distribution, etc. Whatever. There is broad doubt about effectiveness and mounting chagrin on safety, both strongly justified imo, and it's not strictly confined to kooks. Then along comes the new policy. Maybe these two things have nothing to do with one another.
I think policy strategists are freaking the fuck out and setting the stage to later claim Abundance Of Caution in the wake of the biggest medical and governmental fuck up of all time, but I don't have any quotes from meetings to substantiate that.