Author Topic: Random pics (Read 4194327 times)

Gregzs · « **Reply #54225 on:** December 12, 2013, 12:39:50 AM »

http://guyism.com/celebrities/instagram-video-victorias-secret-models-twerking.html

Video proof that Victoria’s Secret models are really, really bad at twerking

This Instagram video of various models twerking backstage at the 2013 Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show should officially put an end to any white girl ever twerking again. Nice try Cara Delevingne, your first video was great, but this one? Sorry. When women who are in the top 1% of the sexiest women in the world look like this when trying to twerk it’s proof positive that the Caucasian race simply needs to stop.

Gregzs · « **Reply #54226 on:** December 12, 2013, 12:45:01 AM »

http://guyism.com/sports/bump-set-spike-31-women-volleyball-shorts.html#1-volleyball-shorts-tumblr-2

Bump, set, spike: 31 women in volleyball shorts

Gregzs · « **Reply #54227 on:** December 12, 2013, 01:11:52 AM »

Jabba Bells

Gregzs · « **Reply #54228 on:** December 12, 2013, 01:17:17 AM »

http://laughingsquid.com/2014-calendar-of-famous-movie-monsters-in-surprisingly-sexy-poses/

Los Angeles artist Erika Deoudes has created a fantastic 2014 calendar filled with illustrations of famous movie monsters in “surprisingly sexy” poses. Various sized calendars and individual prints are available to purchase online from Erika’s Etsy store, modusDeoudes. You can also view more of the alluring monsters on her Facebook page.

These monsters have merely slipped into something a little more comfortable. And their nether regions are always covered, even if they’re unrecognizable. These are very kinky monsters, but the kind you can take home to mother. The months in this calendar are a silly mash-up of the name of the monster and the name of the month.

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #54229 on:** December 12, 2013, 01:28:02 AM »

Quote from: Kwon_2 on December 11, 2013, 10:12:33 PM

Did Romans really have that kind of physique 30 BC?

I wrote an extensive article about this and also in general about ancient statues that display impossible physiques for a natural.

Kwon_2 · « **Reply #54230 on:** December 12, 2013, 02:17:07 AM »

Quote from: Cleanest Natural on December 12, 2013, 01:28:02 AM

I wrote an extensive article about this and also in general about ancient statues that display impossible physiques for a natural.

But they didn't have PEDS back then, it's still strange that these sculptures of statues made these physical specimen even though nobody looked that way back then.

Why would they regard it as aesthetic etc, when nobody looked like that?

Interesting indeed.

Maybe they had "visitors" / timetravellers / reptilians / Isons, that tried to blend in but didn't really manage to get an authentic physiques.

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #54231 on:** December 12, 2013, 02:26:14 AM »

Quote from: Kwon_2 on December 12, 2013, 02:17:07 AM

But they didn't have PEDS back then, it's still strange that these sculptures of statues made these physical specimen even though nobody looked that way back then.

Why would they regard it as aesthetic etc, when nobody looked like that?

Interesting indeed.

Maybe they had "visitors" / timetravellers / reptilians / Isons, that tried to blend in but didn't really manage to get an authentic physiques.

They were humans but different kinds of races. Their genetics were different. In our current version we are frail and weak. But those were taller and much stronger without PED's. More muscular, leaner, stronger, and generally a little different.