« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: compared to 2022?  (Read 1145 times)

joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 34896
compared to 2022?
« on: December 31, 2022, 05:13:03 PM »
Logged

Cableguy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Cableguy no longer...
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2022, 07:27:17 PM »
Ronnie's abs didn't look too bad back then.
Logged

Humble Narcissist

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32200
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2023, 12:11:16 AM »
Excellent. Those days are probably gone forever.
Logged

ROBOAK

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1116
  • toughest getbigger of all time
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2023, 12:24:34 AM »
Dorian tried way to hard with his posing,

he "tried" to be all "eloquent"  with his side Bicep and his movements but instead came across as awkward,

  he should have just stuck with his bread and butter, in your face front lat,rear lat,side tri,arm/ab and left all the fluffy shit for the other twinks and choco's on stage.....
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71215
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2023, 12:39:34 AM »
No comparison to todays slobs.   :(
Logged

ThisisOverload

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2023, 04:30:21 PM »
They are all better than today.

Ronnie looks insane.

Nasser looks great until he turns around.

PIP
Logged

a_pupil

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3288
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2023, 05:16:40 PM »
Mid 90s were the peak of bodybuilding.

Could it be because they were the last batch to have the 1st world produced pharma gear? There was that pharma tren/parabolan as well. They were running slin and hgh but probably only had legit pharma gear, so weren't dosing the hgh as high as the bloofballs today.
Logged

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14165
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2023, 05:23:19 PM »
Nothing compares to yesterday's pros.

Look at this posing masterpiece from Will "World" Harris back at the 2007 Mr. Olympia. Skip to the 2:15-2:35 mark for the real "crowd pleasing" material.



"1"
Logged

pamith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8773
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2023, 05:36:12 PM »
Quote from: Humble Narcissist on January 01, 2023, 12:11:16 AM
Excellent. Those days are probably gone forever.
This, srs, bodybuilding was the best back then, now not so much
Logged

ThisisOverload

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7719
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2023, 05:52:41 PM »
Quote from: OneMoreRep on January 01, 2023, 05:23:19 PM
Nothing compares to yesterday's pros.

Look at this posing masterpiece from Will "World" Harris back at the 2007 Mr. Olympia. Skip to the 2:15-2:35 mark for the real "crowd pleasing" material.



"1"

That always cracks me up. ;D

And did a little booty shake for all the schmoes.
Logged

beakdoctor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7765
  • Royalty looks like a colostomy bag.
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2023, 07:14:14 PM »
Quote from: OneMoreRep on January 01, 2023, 05:23:19 PM
Nothing compares to yesterday's pros.

Look at this posing masterpiece from Will "World" Harris back at the 2007 Mr. Olympia. Skip to the 2:15-2:35 mark for the real "crowd pleasing" material.



"1"

Will "World" Harris is a sick,  sick man.
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: compared to 2022?
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2023, 10:58:09 PM »
Quote from: OneMoreRep on January 01, 2023, 05:23:19 PM
Nothing compares to yesterday's pros.

Look at this posing masterpiece from Will "World" Harris back at the 2007 Mr. Olympia. Skip to the 2:15-2:35 mark for the real "crowd pleasing" material.



"1"

Lolololololol Twinkle Toes Wllie.
Logged
7
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »