Bruh, I'm not really understanding what your point was in posting this in relation to this thread, then. Are you saying that you don't think white recruits regularly get that kind of treatment?
Well it just came to mind in relation to "meritocracy." I'm not saying anything other than "test results" and merits were set aside for whatever reason. I'm sure it happens everywhere. I've read about how Universities for example claim they accept students based on merit but it's hardly the case always. And how come famous and successful people often seem to have offspring who then go to the same school - because of merit or because daddy pulled strings? Yes, I'm thinking of whites here too.
One thing you might be able to answer for me: it seems to me blacks aren't the least bit embarrassed if they get somewhere based on quotas, not on merit. And they always want "the money" and the "rep'rations." Is this correct? Other races can be ashamed of it, blacks don't weem to care, like in the recently "in the news" case where Universities were found to use secret methods/quotas to keep Asians out of
Universities and get unqualified blacks in. Haven't they already done away with any testing for blacks when it comes to University admissions, in some places/schools? On one hand I can understand it, some schools would have close to zero black students if they had to get in via merits. And how would you explain that, except by blaming racism?
Apparently one other group benefited from favoritism I forgot about, Jews. Not completely unqualified but represented by more admissions than the merits would suggest. In fact, some think the Asian discrimination was also to keep the Jewish represantation up.
That Jew fella Ron Unz wrote about the quotas for decades on his site, I don't remember all the details so I mught be wrong in sone of what I wrote here
