Hankins logic: Because anyone can get GH with a script, my GH without a script is okay.
What is your point? What are you trying to say? You suspect I get my GH through nonprescription sources? Who fucking cares? Why would it matter? So paying x dollars to a pharmacy to fill your prescription at a US pharmacy is ok but ordering it direct and paying 1/5 of X dollars is morally wrong?
So Senior citizens who go to Mexico to fill their prescriptions at a fraction of the price are doing something wrong? You realize you are actually allowed to import a 3 month supply of prescription medications for personal usage. If you have a US script for a controlled substance and go overseas and it is OTC should you not by it? I am failing to understand your logic?
HRT prescribed from your local family Dr is ok as long as they prescribe 100mg or less? But if you go to an online HRT clinic and get 200mg or more prescribed then that is not ok? If you got 100mg prescribed from your local family Dr and then sourced it overseas to save money would that be ok? Or if you got 300mg prescribed from your online HRT Dr then filled the prescription full price at your local CVS would that be ok? What about if someone lived in a country that didn't regulate Testosterone? In that country is there a morally acceptable dosage? I am just trying to understand your logic is it HRT or prescriptions or which Dr you go to that you take issue with or is it who you buy your medications from or is it the dosage?