Author Topic: Trump Whodunnit: Prosecutors admit key evidence in document case has been tamper  (Read 1069 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59952
  • It’s All Bullshit
JUST IN: Judge Cannon Calls Jack Smith Out For His Dirty Tricks in Rare Sunday Order

Judge Aileen Cannon called out Special Counsel Jack Smith for his dirty tricks in Trump’s classified documents case in a rare Sunday filing.

Jack Smith has repeatedly warned of a ‘significant, immediate’ threat to the government witnesses if their names were unredacted.

The Special Counsel has been fighting to keep the names of government witnesses a secret. He also opposed the unsealing of discovery material because one document confirms the existence of another FBI investigation.

In a five-page order, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, said that she is “disappointed” that Jack Smith has demanded redactions for “witness safety” when it benefits him, but ignored those concerns at other times.

The] Court deems it necessary to express concern over Special Counsel’s treatment of certain sealed materials in this case. In two separate filings related to sealing, the Special Counsel stated, without qualification, that he had no objection to full unsealing of previously sealed docket entries related to allegations of prosecutorial misconduct,” Cannon wrote.

Judge Cannon said that “nowhere in that explanation is there any basis to conclude that the Special Counsel could not have defended the integrity of his Office while simultaneously preserving the witness-safety and concerns he has repeatedly told the Court, and maintains to this day, are of serious consequence, and which the Court has endeavored with diligence to accommodate in its multiple Orders on sealing/redaction. The Court is disappointed in these developments.”

Cannon “granted in part and denied in part” Jack Smith’s motions requesting redactions in Trump’s defense filings.

Finally, to the extent the Special Counsel asserts a need for continued secrecy over the subject material under Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Court accepts that rationale despite concerns about the Special Counsel’s use of Rule 6(e) as a basis for continued secrecy, and authorizes the requested sealing/redactions subject to potential further review,” the Judge wrote.


Earlier this month Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely postponed Jack Smith’s classified documents trial against Trump.

The Judge vacated the May 20, 2024 trial date after Jack Smith admitted the FBI messed with the boxes containing “classified” documents they seized from Trump.

The DOJ previously assured the Court that the placement of classified documents as originally found had been maintained – THEY LIED!

It may be several months until Judge Cannon sets a new trial date.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/judge-cannon-calls-jack-smith-his-dirty-tricks/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=judge-cannon-calls-jack-smith-his-dirty-tricks






Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22461
  • SC è un asino
Lelita case: campaigned on "getting trump", victim-less "crime", activist judge, no jury, Hochul running damage control because business in NY fleeing
Bragg case: No crime, statue of limitations expired, no proof, embarrassment thinking Cohen was the "gotcha" witness
Smith case: oops
Fani case: Fani fucking special prosecutor, taking taxpayer money for vacations.  Can't make this shit up

It's unreal.


Y

Gym Rat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12777
  • Libturdz Love The Caulk
Lelita case: campaigned on "getting trump", victim-less "crime", activist judge, no jury, Hochul running damage control because business in NY fleeing
Bragg case: No crime, statue of limitations expired, no proof, embarrassment thinking Cohen was the "gotcha" witness
Smith case: oops
Fani case: Fani fucking special prosecutor, taking taxpayer money for vacations.  Can't make this shit up

It's unreal.

Dumbest commies on the planet... And most corrupt..

visualizeperfection

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10704
  • Getbig sponsored athlete.
Lelita case: campaigned on "getting trump", victim-less "crime", activist judge, no jury, Hochul running damage control because business in NY fleeing
Bragg case: No crime, statue of limitations expired, no proof, embarrassment thinking Cohen was the "gotcha" witness
Smith case: oops
Fani case: Fani fucking special prosecutor, taking taxpayer money for vacations.  Can't make this shit up

It's unreal.

What’s the common denominator amongst these would be hero’s? I mean, is there anything they all have in common?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59952
  • It’s All Bullshit
What’s the common denominator amongst these would be hero’s? I mean, is there anything they all have in common?

Soros, Clinton, Obama, China and the need for power by way of one party rule

chaos

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 57825
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
What’s the common denominator amongst these would be hero’s? I mean, is there anything they all have in common?
Faggotry
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15959
  • Silence you furry fool!
Biden administration authorized 'Use of Deadly Force' in Mar-a-Lago raid

The Biden administration authorized the use of deadly force during the FBI’s raid on former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida in August 2022 as part of its investigation into classified records, court documents revealed.

An "Operations Order" produced in discovery as part of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into Trump’s alleged improper retention of classified records revealed that the "FBI believed its objective for the Mar-a-Lago raid was to seize ‘classified information, NDI, and US Government records,’" as described in the search warrant.

The order, according to a court filing, contained a "Policy Statement" regarding "Use of Deadly Force," which stated, for example, "Law Enforcement officers of the Department of Justice may use deadly force when necessary."

The FBI told Fox News in a statement, "The FBI followed standard protocol in this search as we do for all search warrants, which includes a standard policy statement limiting the use of deadly force. No one ordered additional steps to be taken and there was no departure from the norm in this matter."

According to the filing, the DOJ and FBI agents "planned to bring ‘Standard Issue Weapons,' ‘Ammo,’ ‘Handcuffs,’ and ‘medium and large sized bolt cutters,’ but they were instructed to wear ‘unmarked polo or collared shirts’ and to keep ‘law enforcement equipment concealed."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-administration-authorized-use-of-deadly-force-mar-a-lago-raid

B_B_C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2394
  • change is the lot of all

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.561.4.pdf


Ensuring compliance with the May 2022 Subpoena has been slow-going, prompting the government to seek and execute a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago, additional government motions regarding inadequate compliance, repeat visits to this Court, and new searches conducted and updated certifications filed, with the compliance effort dragging into mid-December 2022, when additional classified documents were recovered from a closet in the [Trump] Office’s designated space at Mar-a-Lago.

Other evidence demonstrates that the former president willfully sought to retain classified documents when he was not authorized to do so, and knew it. First, even before the issuance of the May 11, 2022 subpoena, he deliberately curtailed his staff’s efforts to comply with NARA’s requests to return missing presidential records. . . . n the months leading up to January 2022, the former president reviewed only fifteen to seventeen of the boxes retrieved from his storage room before telling his staff, “that’s it,” and instructing WITNESS [redacted] to tell one of the former president’s lawyers that no more boxes remained at Mar-a-Lago. The former president knew at the time that he had only reviewed a fraction of the total boxes in the storage room, because his staff had showed him a picture of the floor-to-ceiling stacks numbering over sixty boxes. . . . The former president’s misdirection of NARA was apparently a dress rehearsal for his actions in response to the May 11, 2022 subpoena.
c