Just another MAGA hypocrite.

[funk51]

  Today's MAGA new FAFO club member
Award goes to a former Texas nurse Crystal Nicole Tadlock. Last month she was pulled over for DUI, said that she was better than the Latino cop because "she's White," told him that ICE hasn't arrested him yet, and if he came into her hospital, she'd let him die.
She was fired by the hospital.     WOW.

[funk51]

   

    GRAPE APE, What should I be thinking about tRUMP's pardon of Juan Hernández ? what's your spin on it ?   Tell me what to think. What are the great interweb podcasters saying ? HMMMM

[Grape Ape]

   

    GRAPE APE, What should I be thinking about tRUMP's pardon of Juan Hernández ? what's your spin on it ?   Tell me what to think. What are the great interweb podcasters saying ? HMMMM

I don't focus on pardons much.  Every President does them, and there's always a bunch of questionable ones.

I have no idea who Juan Hernandez is, I don't listen to Jimmy Kimmel and will not click youtube links to support him.

If it's something that really is bothering you and you really want to discuss it, explain what happened in your own words and we'll see where it goes.  It would be interesting what you think of the prior admins pardons, since I haven't seen you post anything about it (my bad if I missed it).

Thanks for the Limbaugh meme though, it was really important to hear what some random dude nobody's ever heard of thought about him.

[LurkerNoMore]

  Today's MAGA new FAFO club member
Award goes to a former Texas nurse Crystal Nicole Tadlock. Last month she was pulled over for DUI, said that she was better than the Latino cop because "she's White," told him that ICE hasn't arrested him yet, and if he came into her hospital, she'd let him die.
She was fired by the hospital.     WOW.

I just read that.  Like, literally, before I logged on here.  And the funniest part was when she was put in the back of the car she was crying hysterically.   

Not only did she lose her job, but she lost her career in a nursing profession as well.  Which is going to suck because even if this is just her first DUI, it will cost about $10,000 or more over the course of time for the fines, court costs, classes, etc.   Looks like a new Walmart greeter in the making.

[LurkerNoMore]

Yes, random people.  If you were focused on politicians who have taken policy positions that are contrary to the crimes they are convicted of, you would have a point.  Your obsession with this is really weird.

There is nothing random about people who install themselves in positions that allow them to come in contact with kids for the sole purpose of preying upon them.  There is nothing random about people who have worked directly in the gov't and other positions of power to abuse it committing crimes against children.  There are plenty of examples included in this thread of politicians and people attempting to change/influence/make legislation while being pedos.

Your defense of this is really weird.

[funk51]

I don't focus on pardons much.  Every President does them, and there's always a bunch of questionable ones.

I have no idea who Juan Hernandez is, I don't listen to Jimmy Kimmel and will not click youtube links to support him.

If it's something that really is bothering you and you really want to discuss it, explain what happened in your own words and we'll see where it goes.  It would be interesting what you think of the prior admins pardons, since I haven't seen you post anything about it (my bad if I missed it).

Thanks for the Limbaugh meme though, it was really important to hear what some random dude nobody's ever heard of thought about him.

  Hernández was found guilty in March 2024 of conspiring to import cocaine to the US, and of possessing machine guns. He was sentenced to 45 years in prison. The US president said Hernández had been "treated very harshly and unfairly" in a social media post announcing the move on Friday.  Cliff note version for those with  adhd disorder.  IS  this one of Trump's very best people ?

[Grape Ape]

  Hernández was found guilty in March 2024 of conspiring to import cocaine to the US, and of possessing machine guns. He was sentenced to 45 years in prison. The US president said Hernández had been "treated very harshly and unfairly" in a social media post announcing the move on Friday.  Cliff note version for those with  adhd disorder.  IS  this one of Trump's very best people ?

There's much more context besides "treated harshly" if you bother to look.

However, still, feels like one that probably wasn't necessary to do, unless there is a bigger play.  So, I would say this was a bad pardon.

Given that , how do you feel about Biden pardoning his family, going all the way back to 2014?

[illuminati]

There's much more context besides "treated harshly" if you bother to look.

However, still, feels like one that probably wasn't necessary to do, unless there is a bigger play.  So, I would say this was a bad pardon.

Given that , how do you feel about Biden pardoning his family, going all the way back to 2014?

Given that , how do you feel about Biden pardoning his family, going all the way back to 2014?


You'll be very fortunate if He or any other Libturd will answer or address
that - now if it had been Donald doing that they'd never ever shut up
about it - Hypocritical Scumbags that they are.

[Dos Equis]

There is nothing random about people who install themselves in positions that allow them to come in contact with kids for the sole purpose of preying upon them.  There is nothing random about people who have worked directly in the gov't and other positions of power to abuse it committing crimes against children.  There are plenty of examples included in this thread of politicians and people attempting to change/influence/make legislation while being pedos.

Your defense of this is really weird.

The last person you searched for and dug up--Ronald Shane Crow--is some random hick from Alabama whom you claim voted for Trump.  He was not a politician as far as I can tell.  Did not hold any public office.  Nothing hypocritical about him.  He's just a criminal. 

You really are a weirdo.

[LurkerNoMore]

The last person you searched for and dug up--Ronald Shane Crow--is some random hick from Alabama whom you claim voted for Trump.  He was not a politician as far as I can tell.  Did not hold any public office.  Nothing hypocritical about him.  He's just a criminal. 

You really are a weirdo.

Ronald Shane Crowe.  A white supremacist and card carrying member of the party that claims to be for "family values".  Drugging, raping and torturing kids.  Some family values.  That's hypocrisy.  Being the biggest hypocrite on the board, I can understand why you might not get it.

Want to try again?

[Primemuscle]

1. I have not seen that video, will check it out, thank you.

2. My political viewpoints are based on my values and what I think is good for our country.  When I used to drive from NJ to Massachusetts when I was young, very few radio stations came in during parts of the trip so I made due with random stuff on AM radio.  I ended up listening to a guy who, to me at the time, made a lot of sense.  Just common sense stuff.  Turned out it was Limbaugh.  I didn't listen much after that, and didn't follow politics until 2016, because it became unavoidable.  Online "tests" put me as libertarian with a conservative slant.

I do always make assumptions when I see something. That's human nature.  If they seem important, or I'm going to discuss them here, I do additional research.  Of course mistakes can be made, but it's a better approach than what is happening with funk.  I am genuinely concerned for folks and how they are manipulated by big tech, agents of chaos, and algorithms.  I have seen way too many videos of folks "protesting" only to find out they have no idea of the subject they're protesting about, or they are protesting based on incorrect information.

It's creating too much angst, and too much mental instability.

But nothing guarantees truth these days - too many nefarious actors are at play.  But anything is better that consuming what you're fed and passing it along, whether it's true or not.

Interesting. With respect to the part I bolded, you and I use the same process. A possible problem is the sources one chooses for research. Human nature may also lead someone to seek confirmation of their foregone opinions when researching something. There is so much information and so many opinions available to everyone which are both true and false and right or wrong, that misdirection and wrong conclusions are bound to result.

[Grape Ape]

Interesting. With respect to the part I bolded, you and I use the same process. A possible problem is the sources one chooses for research. Human nature may also lead someone to seek confirmation of their foregone opinions when researching something. There is so much information and so many opinions available to everyone which are both true and false and right or wrong, that misdirection and wrong conclusions are bound to result.

I've given you a list of my sources on multiple occasions, they are mostly independent journalists, and a mix of republicans and democrats.

Confirmation bias isn't my thing.

[Primemuscle]

I've given you a list of my sources on multiple occasions, they are mostly independent journalists, and a mix of republicans and democrats.

Confirmation bias isn't my thing.

Confirmation bias may not be your thing but most likely you have some biases. For anyone to have no bias at all is extremely unlikely. This is even more true of implicit/unconscious bias.

[Grape Ape]

Confirmation bias may not be your thing but most likely you have some biases. For anyone to have no bias at all is extremely unlikely. This is even more true of implicit/unconscious bias.

I get to places where I feel the facts are as close to as indisputable as they can be.  If that means there's some bias, so be it.

A lot of times the truth is easy to find, and it's often is just these truths go unreported by a dishonest media.